Having discussed the various literal senses of the word, let us now see what the pre-Islamic concepts of ilaah were, and which of these the Qur'ān strove to reject:

And they have taken for their ilaahs others than Allah, that they may according to their reckoning be a source of strength to them (or that coming under their protection may confer security). (al-Maryam 19:81)

And they have taken others than Allah as their ilaahs hoping that they might be helped when needed. (al-Yaseen 36:74)

From these two verses we learn that the Arabs of the Jahiliyyah (the pre-Islamic period of Ignorance) believed that those whom they regarded as ilaahs were their patrons, would come to their rescue in time of danger or difficulty, and that by placing themselves under their protection they rendered themselves safe from fear, molestation or harm.

…And when the Decree of your Lord had gone forth (and the time came for its execution), the ilaahs they used to invoke instead of Allah proved of no avail to them and contributed only to their doom…. (al-Hud 11:101)

And those whom the people call to instead of Allah have not created aught, but are themselves creatures. Dead they are, and not alive, and they know not when they would be raised from their state, the real ilaah is the One and Only Ilaah….

(an-Nahl 18:20-21)

Invoke not; or pray to, any ilaah along with Allah. There is no ilaah but He….

[It should be borne in mind that the word Ilaah is used in the Qur'an in two different senses, namely, the object or being, etc., to whom worship is actually being given, irrespective of whether rightly or wrongly, and the Being who is really worthy of worship. In this verse, the word is used in the first sense on the first occasion and in the other sense on the second. -.Maududi](al-Yunus 28:88)

....And those who, instead of praying to Allah, pray to His supposed associates do not but follow suppositions and idle guesses. (al-Qasas 10:66)

These verses point to three aspects.

The first is that the Arabs used to address their prayers to those whom they regarded as their ilaahs and invoke them in times of distress or for fulfilment of any of their needs.

The second is that these ilaahs included not only Jinns, angels, and gods, but dead humans too, as one can see from the second of the above verses.

The third is that they believed that these ilaahs could hear their prayers and could come to their rescue.

It seems desirable to clear up one point, at this stage, about the nature of the prayer made to the ilaah or ilaahs and the help or succour sought of them. If I feel thirsty, and call to my servant to give me some water, or am unwell and call for a doctor for treatment, my summons to them does not constitute du’a, that is, it has no similarity to a prayer sent up to a deity, nor does this make either the servant or the doctor into an ilaah. Both these are common, in everyday happenings, with nothing of the supernatural about them. However, if I should, while feeling thirsty or unwell, call to some saint or god instead of the servant or a doctor, that obviously would amount to treating the saint or god as an ilaah and to my addressing a du’a to him.

Addressing a prayer to a saint confined to his grave hundreds or even thousands of miles away [In point of principle, it makes no difference if the distance were of a few feet only, the significant point being the act of addressing a prayer to someone who is dead and is believed to possess, even in, or perhaps because of that state, some extraordinary powers not only of hearing the prayer but also of granting it if he so chooses. It is also believed that the saint may, if he cannot himself grant the prayer, pass it up to God with a recommendation] clearly indicates that I believe him – though dead – to be possessed of the power to listen to a prayer at such a distance or to otherwise being aware of things so far off or, if one may use the appropriate Arabic words, to be both samee’ and baseer’ [Literally, these words, which are actually two of Allah’s personal attributes, mean, the All-Hearing the All-Seeing, respectively. God’s knowledge transcends everything, and He is aware of everything that is happening anywhere. This is not the case with His creatures, whose capacities in these respects are severely limited. To believe someone other than God to have power to physically hear prayer offered out of his hearing or to see things happening out of his sight amounts to attributing to him powers which are God’s only, and which He has never given to any of His creatures] My action would clearly imply belief in their exercising such a way over the realm of creation as to be able to have water reach me or to make me recover from my illness. In the case of a god, my prayer would mean that I believe him to possess power over water and over health and sickness, and to therefore arrange, by supernatural means, to fulfil my needs.

Thus, the basis on which a prayer is addressed to someone includes necessarily a concept of his being possessed of some supernatural authority and power.

And, verily, We did destroy the places of which you see ruins about you, and We showed them Our signs in diverse ways that they might turn (away from their wrong ways to Us). So why did not those whom they had made their ilaahs, and presumed to have access to Us, help them in their hour of doom? Far from helping, they abandoned them and made themselves scarce, exposing the hollowness of their falsehoods and fabrications. [The reference here obviously is not to mythological or inanimate gods, but to priests and others who exacted peoples’ worship and thus set themselves up as Ilaahs in opposition to the True Ilaah] (al-Ahqaf 46:27-28)

And wherefore should I not give my worship to Him who created me and to Whom all of you will return? Should I take for myself ilaah other than Allah Who, should He Who is also Ar-Rahman wish me any harm, will avail me naught by their intercession, nor will they be able to come to my rescue? (al-Yaseen 36:22-23)

…And those who have taken others than Allah as protectors or helpers say, “We do not worship them except that they may bring us closer to Him.” Allah will decide for them on the Day of Judgement regarding that in which they differ….

(az-Zumar 39:3)

And they worship other than Allah those who have power neither to harm nor benefit them, and they say that they are their intercessors with Him.

(al-Yunus 10:18)

What we learn from these verses is, firstly, that it was not that the Arabs believed their ilaahs to account for the whole of divinity among themselves or that there was no Supreme Being over and above them. They quite clearly believed in the existence of such a Being for whom they employed the special Proper name of ‘Allah.’ As for their ilaahs, their belief consisted essentially of the concept that they enjoyed some share in the divinity of the Supreme God, that their word carried some weight with Him, and that their intercession could result in some gains or ward off some harm or loss. It was on these grounds that they regarded them as ilaahs besides Allah and, considering their precept and practice, we may say that it was the belief about someone to have power to intercede with God, the act of addressing of prayers to him for help, the performing of certain devotions indicative of respect and reverence and adoration, and the making of offerings, that constituted in their terminology, the treating of Him as ilaah. And God said:

“Do not make two ilaahs; there is but one ilaah…So, fear Me alone.” (an-Nahl 16:51)

…And (Ibrahim said to them): I fear not those you associate with God. Any harm can come to me only if He should will it, and not otherwise (through any or all of your supposed gods)…. (al-An’aam 6:80)

(And said Hud’s people to him:) All we think of you is that you are under the curse of someone or other of our ilaahs. (al-Hud 11:54)

According to these verses, the Arab belief about their ilaahs was that if they should give them any cause for offence or should otherwise be deprived of their favours and attentions, they would suffer epidemics, famine, lose of life and property, or other calamities.

They made their religious scholars and rabbis their rabbs instead of Allah, and Jesus son of Mary too into one, although they had been told to worship but one ilaah only, besides Whom there is no ilaah at all…. (at-Tawbah 9:31)

Have you noticed the men who has made his selfish desires his ilaah? Can you assume any responsibility about such a one? (al-Furqan 25:43)

And in this wise did the supposed gods of pagans make infanticide appear an approved act in their eyes…. (al-An’aam 6:137)

What! Have they partners in godhood who have established for them some religion without sanction from God?.... (ash-Shuraa 42:21)

Here we have yet another concept of ilaah very different from those dealt with above.

Here there is no element of the supernatural. The ilaah here is some human being, or man’s own selfish ego or selfish desires. No prayers are offered to it, nor is it regarded as being in a position to will any harm or benefit to someone nor is it looked to for help or succour. It is an ilaah in the sense that its dictates are accepted and obeyed to such extent that that which it declares to be permitted or prohibited is treated as such, and it is deemed to have an inherent right to make us do or not do certain things, with no higher or superior authority whose approval might be necessary for its orders or which might be appealed to against them.

The first verse we have quoted here (at-Tawbah 9:31) speaks of religious scholars and rabbis having been made into ilaahs. We get a very lucid explanation of this in Hadith. Hazrat ’Adi bin Hatim once asked the Holy Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلمabout the verse, and in reply the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلمtold him that what was characterised as taking as ilaahs was the practice of accepting as permitted or prohibited anything pronounced as such by the scholars or rabbis, without caring to ascertain what God had actually said about it.

As for the second verse, (al-Furqaan 25:43) the meaning is clear enough. He who obeys only the dictates of his selfish desires or inclinations or, rather regards his personal views as the only law, in effect makes his self his ilaah instead of God.

The last two verses use the word shurakaa’ which we have translated as supposed gods or partners, in godhood, but although the word ilaah has not been used, the implication clearly is that to treat any beings, etc., as shurakaa’ amounts, in effect, to believing them to have a share in divinity. The import of these verses is that those who regard any custom or rule or practice as permissible although it has no divine sanction, are guilty of treating the originators of the custom, etc., as having a share in divinity, i. e., of treating them as ilaahs.