A jumlace, yana da wuya a tabbatar da cewa hujjojin kimiyya game da adawa da Allah, hujjar tsari (design argument), da addini, sun gaza haifar da sakamakon barin addini ga masu motsi na 'New Atheism' a cikin al'ummomin addinin Kirista da Musulunci a ƙasashen da ake magana da Turanci, duk da cewa sun haifar da shakku a tsakanin mutanen addini. Wani zabe da aka gudanar a tashar YouTube wadda wani mai tasiri a Musulunci ya dauki nauyinta, mai mabiya 254,000 kuma ƙwararre wajen 'gabatar da hujja game da Musulunci da ilimantar da mutane a kansa', ya nemi gano dalilin shakku ta hanyar cewa: 'Amsoshin waɗannan tambayoyi ba a san su ba ne a fili, don haka don Allah ku amsa da gaskiya gwargwadon iko. Idan kai Musulmi ne, menene ya fi sa ka shakkar addininka daga cikin zaɓuɓɓukan nan: hujjojin ɗabi'a game da Musulunci, hujjojin kimiyya daga masu kare Ateism, hujjojin cewa wani addini ne gaskiya, ko raunin 'wayewar Musulunci' (Hijab, n.d., an dawo da shi ranar 11 ga Afrilu, 2020). Mutane 7,200 ne suka amsa zaben ba tare da an san su ba, inda kashi 48% suka ce ɗabi'a ce babban dalilin shakku, kashi 21% suka ce hujjojin kimiyya daga New Atheists, kashi 7% suka ce hujjojin cewa wani addini ne gaskiya, sannan kashi 24% suka ce raunin 'wayewar' Musulunci.

In sum, it is difficult to evidence that scientific arguments against God, the design argument, and religion, have failed to produce apostatising results for the cause of ‘New Atheism’ within Christian and Muslim faith communities in the English-speaking world, although they have generated doubts within religious people. A poll conducted on a YouTube channel hosted by a Muslim influencer, with 254,000 followers and specialising in ‘arguing the case for and educating people about Islam’, sought to assess the cause of doubt by stating: ‘The answers to these questions are obviously anonymous, so please answer as truthfully as possible. If you are a Muslim, what causes you to doubt your religion the most from the following options: Moral arguments against Islam, scientific arguments from Atheist apologists, arguments for the truth of another religion or weaknesses of the ‘Islamic civilisation’ (Hijab, n.d., Retrieved April 11, 2020). 7,200 people responded anonymously to the survey with 48% acknowledging morality as the leading cause for doubt, 21% scientific arguments from New Atheists, 7% for the arguments for the truth of another religion and 24% on the weaknesses of the Islamic ‘civilisation’.

Wannan zaɓe tare da binciken da aka gudanar kan shakka daga Chouhoud da wasu waɗanda aka ambata a baya, sun tabbatar da cewa hujjojin Sabon Rashin Imani (New Atheism) suna da wani tasiri a kan al'ummar Musulmi da Kiristoci. Ko da yake waɗannan hujjoji ba sabbi ba ne a tarihi, ƙarfin hujjojin "kimiyya" a cikin littattafan New Atheism da kayan muhawara, idan aka kwatanta da sauran sharhin zamantakewa, suna sa tasirin waɗannan hujjoji ya zama wanda za a iya ware shi a kuma bincika. Hujjojin ɗabi'a da na falsafar siyasa, waɗanda aka nuna cewa suna haifar da ƙarin shakka da ridda ga Musulmi da Kiristoci a ƙasashen da ake magana da Turanci, ba su keɓanta ga fagen ilimi na New Atheists ba. A ƙarshe, da alama New Atheists suna rasa tasiri da shahara a tsakanin matasa a hankali. Richard Dawkins yana da matsakaicin maki 100 a Google Trends a watan Nuwamba 2006 (bayan buga littafin The God Delusion), amma ya faɗi zuwa maki 19 kacal a shekarar 2019 bayan buga Outgrowing God. Idan aka yi la'akari da waɗannan alkaluma, da alama yana da wuya a yi jayayya cewa New Atheism zai yi wani tasiri mai dorewa a kan yawan mabiya addini nan gaba.

This poll together with the research conducted on doubt by Chouhoud and others that were previously mentioned, confirms that New Atheist arguments have some influence on Muslim and Christian communities. Though the arguments are not historically novel, the forcefulness of the ‘science’ arguments in New Atheist books and debate material, comparative to other social commentaries, make the effect of these arguments isolatable and researchable. Moral and politically philosophical arguments, which were shown to cause more doubt and apostasy for Muslims and Christians in the English-speaking world, are not the exclusive intellectual domain of the New Atheists. Finally, it would seem that New Atheists are steadily losing traction and popularity among younger audiences. Richard Dawkins had an average point score of 100 on Google Trends in November 2006 (following publication of the God Delusion) dropping to a meagre 19 comparative points in 2019 after the publication of Outgrowing God. Considering these stats, it seems difficult to argue that New Atheism will have any lasting demographic effect on religiosity in the future.