Along with the run up in credit over this past period we have seen a deterioration in accounting standards that have contributed to uncertainty and a lack of confidence in the system in general. Mirroring the growth in credit has been a growth in “off-balance sheet” recording of assets and liabilities, many of which are derivatives. This has enabled the holding of risky assets and liabilities beyond the gaze of investors and regulators alike. The extent of this could be seen in the recently bailed out Citigroup, the largest bank in the world, which as of June 2008 had 1.2 Trillion dollars of off-balance sheet holdings. Pauline Wallace, a partner at PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP accurately portrayed this off-balance sheet accounting when she said: “Magicians come to parties, and they make things seem to disappear. The risk is somewhere, but you never knew where28”.

Off-balance sheet holdings include futures, forwards and certain loan commitments – whilst Islamic law forbids outright the entering into many of these contracts, the effective hiding of them is doubly a problem as it runs counter to the requirement for transparency of accounting for all assets and liabilities. Like western markets Islamic society places enormous importance on the provision of timely and accurate financial statements for the regulation of company practice and reporting of earnings and financial position. Islamic law mandates that company accounts be prepared regularly and the distribution of earnings amongst investors is based upon the accurate provision of same. The non recording of any assets or liabilities in the financial statements is simply not allowed. In addition to the government bailouts, distressed US lenders are also now looking to the suspension of “mark to market” accounting rules as a means of salvation. These rules require institutions to value their mortgage assets according to the most recently traded price. However, the recent relaxing of these rules will not make the losses go away. Rather it will simply allow lenders to pretend that the losses do not exist to the expense of anyone investing in these companies and confidence in the system. Banks can now pretend that their mortgage assets for example have greater value, and that their balance sheets are well capitalised. They would not need to raise more capital in order to fund new loans. But, just as a person with no sensitivity to pain runs the risk of catastrophic injury, such a move actually encourages financial institutions to take greater risks, which, in the end, will produce more bankruptcies and greater losses.

Rather than letting corporations dictate to regulators how accounting standards should or should not be applied, the Shariah law requires consistent application of market values in determining financial position. Investors joining or leaving a company cannot do so on the basis of “mark to model” or other estimates of what those whose bonus is dependant on the highest value, want to include. There is too much influence on government policy from corporate elites in the West, a matter that cannot arise in Islam as with the election of a new Caliph, the company structure, formation and accounting laws cannot be changed. The constant tinkering with the corporate laws expose the inherent failures of a system that is not fit for purpose and lacks the true transparency investors crave.