基督教的宣传者非常喜欢引用以下经文，以此证明他们的《圣经》是上帝的话语。

The Christian propagandist is very fond of quoting the following verse as proof that his Bible is the Word of God.

“凡圣经都是神所默示的，于教训、督责、使人归正、教导人学义都是有益的。”（2 提摩太书 3:16 ——斯科菲尔德版钦定本）

"All scripture IS given by inspiration of God, and ISIS profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness." (2 Timothy 3:16 — AV by Scofield)

请注意大写的"IS’s"。斯科菲尔德博士在无声地告诉我们，这些词在希腊原文中并不存在。由英国国教会、苏格兰教会、卫理公会、公理宗教会、浸信会联合会、英格兰长老会等众多教会代表组成的委员会，以及英国和海外圣经公会，译出了《新英语圣经》（THE NEW ENGLISH BIBLE），它是最接近希腊原文的译本，值得在此转录。

Note the "IS’s" in capitals. Rev. Scofield is telling us silently that they do not occur in the original Greek. "THE NEW ENGLISH BIBLE," translated by a committee representing the Church of England, the Church of Scotland, the Methodist Church, the Congregational Church, the Baptist Union, the Presbyterian Church of England, etc., etc., and the BRITISH AND FOREIGN BIBLE SOCIETY has produced the closest translation of the original Greek which deserves to be reproduced here:

“凡经上所记载的，都是神所默示的，于教训、督责、使人归正、教导人学义都是有益的。”（提摩太后书 3:16）

"EVERY INSPIRED SCRIPTURE HAS ITS USE FOR TEACHING THE TRUTH AND REFUTING ERROR, OR FOR REFORMATION OF MANNERS AND DISCIPLINE IN RIGHT LIVING." (2 Timothy 3:16)

罗马天主教徒在他们的"杜埃"译本中，也比新教徒在他们的"钦定本"(AV)中更忠于原文。他们说："凡经上的话都是神所默示的，于教训、督责、使人归正、教导人学义都是有益的……"我们不在文字上斤斤计较。穆斯林与基督徒一致认为，凡出于神的，无论是通过启示还是默示，都必定服务于以下四个目的之一：——1. 它必须either教导我们教义；2. 督责我们的错误；3. 给予我们纠正；4. 引导我们走向正义。

The Roman Catholics in their "Douay" Version, are also more faithful to the text than the Protestants in their Authorised Version (AV). They say: "ALL SCRIPTURE, INSPIRED OF GOD, IS PROFITABLE TO TEACH, TO REPROVE, TO CORRECT . . ." We will not quibble with words. Muslims and Christians are agreed that whatever emanates from God, whether through in inspiration or by revelation, must serve one of four purposes:- 1. It must either teach us DOCTRINE; 2. REPROVE us for our error; 3. Offer us CORRECTION; 4. Guide us into RIGHTEOUSNESS.

我四十年来一直向基督教的学者们请教，问他们能否再提供第五个“支点”来悬挂神的话语。他们明显未能做到。但这并不意味着我的表现就比他们更好。让我们用这些客观的检验标准来审视“圣经”。

I have been asking learned men of Christianity for the past forty years, whether they can supply a FIFTH "peg" to hang the Word of God on. They have failed signally. That does not mean that I have improved upon their performance. Let us examine the "Holy Bible" with these objective tests.

圣经《创世记》是第一卷书，其中有许多美好的例子。请翻开第三十八章阅读。这里记载了犹大的历史1，犹大是犹太民族的祖先，"犹太"（judea）和"犹太教"（Judaism）之名即由他而来。这位犹太族长结婚后，上帝赐给他三个儿子：珥、俄南和示拉。长子长大成人后，犹大为他娶了一位名叫他玛的女子。"犹大的长子珥在耶和华眼中看为恶，耶和华就击杀了他。"（创世记 38:7）依据提摩太所列的四项原则，你会把这段令人悲伤的记载归入哪一类？第二项——"责备"就是答案。珥作恶，所以上帝除灭了他。这是给所有人的教训：上帝必因我们的恶行而毁灭我们。责备！ 接着讲这段犹太历史：按照他们的习俗，若兄弟死了而没有后嗣，另一兄弟便有责任与他的寡嫂同房，为死者留下后裔，使死者的名字得以延续。犹大依循这一习俗，吩咐次子俄南尽这份本分。但嫉妒进入了他的心。孩子将是他的后裔，名分却归于他兄长！于是到了关键时刻，"他便把精液遗在地上……他所做的这事耶和华看为恶，所以也击杀了他。"（创世记 38:9-10）同样，这场击杀应归入提摩太的哪一项？答案仍是"责备！"这些答案很容易，无需奖励。它们十分基本：行恶，就要承担后果！俄南在"上帝的书"中已被遗忘，但基督教性学家却借"体外射精"之称，以"俄南主义"2之名将他载入他们的《性书》中而使他"不朽"。 现在犹大对他的儿�媳他玛说，让她回到父亲家中，等到他的第三个儿子示拉长大成人，那时便接她回来，好让他尽到本分。 1. 你还记得肯尼斯·克拉格博士在《宣礼塔的呼唤》（Call of the Minaret）及其《历史》一书中的论述吗？完整引文见第一页。这就是那段"历史"。 2. 手淫:如今已被收录于《牛津词典》。

The very first book of the Bible — Genesis — provides us with many beautiful examples. Open chapter 38 and read. We are given here the history1 of Judah, the father of the Jewish race, from whom we derive the names "judea" and "Judaism." This patriarch of the Jews got married and God granted him three sons, Er, Onan and Shelah. When the first-born was big enough, Judah had him married to a lady called Tamar. "BUT ER, JUDAH'S FIRST-BORN WAS WICKED IN THE SIGHT OF THE LORD; AND THE LORD SLEW HIM.'' (Genesis 38:7). Under what heading, from the above four principles of Timothy will you place this sad news? The second — "REPROVE" is the answer. Er was wicked so God killed him. A lesson for all, God will destroy us for our wickedness. REPROOF! Continuing with this Jewish history, according to their custom, if a brother died and left no offspring, it was the duty of the other brother to give "seed" to his sisters-in-law so that the deceased's name might be perpetuated. Judah, in honour of this custom, orders his second son Onan to do his duty. But Jealousy enters his heart. It will be his seed but the name will be his brother's! So at the critical moment "HE SPILLED IT ON THE GROUND . . . AND THE THING HE DID DISPLEASED THE LORD: WHEREFORE HE SLEW HIM ALSO." (Genesis 38:9-10). Again, where does this slaying fit into Timothy's tests? "REPROOF!" is the answer again. No prizes are offered for these easy answers. They are so basic. Do wrong and bear the consequence! Onan is forgotten in the "Book of God," but Christian sexologists have immortalized him by referring to "coitus interruptus," as Onanism2 in their "Books of Sex." Now Judah tells his daughter-in-law, Tamar, to return to her father's house until his third son Shelah attains manhood, when she will be brought back so that he can do his duty.1. You remember Dr. Kenneth Cragg in his "Call of the Minaret" and his "HISTORY." See full quotation on page one. This is that "history." 2. "ONANISM:" Now immortalized in the Oxford Dictionary.

示拉长大了，或许已经与另一个女子结婚。但犹大并没有履行他对他玛的义务。他内心深处十分恐惧。他已经因为这个“女巫”失去了两个儿子——“恐怕他（示拉）也像他的哥哥们一样死去”（创世记38:11）。于是犹大便刻意忘记了他的承诺。这位遭受委屈的年轻女子决定向她的公公复仇，因为他剥夺了她获得“后嗣”的权利。他玛得知犹大将要前往亭拿为羊剪毛。她打算在途中向他讨回公道。她抢先一步，走到通往亭拿路上的一个空旷之处坐下。犹大看见她，因为她蒙着脸，便以为她是个娼妓。他走近她，提议说：“让我与你同房吧。”她说：“你给我什么，你才可以与我同房呢？”他答应从羊群中送给她一只山羊羔。她凭什么保证他会送来？犹大问她要什么担保。“你的印章、带子和手杖”，她随即回答。这位老人便把这些物件交给了她，“就与她同房，她就怀了孕”（创世记38:16-18）。

Shelah grows up and is, perhaps, married to another woman. But Judah had not fulfilled his obligation to Tamar. Deep in his heart he is terrified. He has already lost two sons on account of this "witch," — "LEST PERADVENTURE HE (Shelah) DIE ALSO, AS HIS BRETHERN DID." (Genesis 38:11). So Judah conveniently forgets his promise. The aggrieved young lady resolves to take revenge on her father-in-law for depriving her of her "seed" right. Tamar learned that Judah is going to Timnath to sheer his sheep. She plans to get even with him on the way. She forestalls him, and goes and sits in an open place en route to Timnath. When Judah sees her, he thinks she is a harlot because she has covered her face. He comes up to her and proposes — "ALLOW ME TO COME IN UNTO THEE; AND SHE SAID WHAT WILT THOU GIVE ME, THAT THOU MAYEST COME IN UNTO ME?" He promises that he would send her a goat kid from his flock. What guarantee could she have that he would send it? What guarantee did she require, Judah queried. "His ring, his bracelet and his staff" is the ready answer. The old man hands these possessions to her, and "CAME IN UNTO HER, AND SHE CONCEIVED BY HIM." (Genesis 38:16-18).

在寻找提摩太后书3:16之下的标题来归类这段来自“神的书”的肮脏故事之前，我不禁想问，正如你也会想问的：我们的孩子从玛玛（Tamar）的“甜蜜复仇”中能学到什么道德教训？当然，我们会给孩子讲寓言，不是为了娱乐，而是希望通过这些故事传递某种道德教训。例如《狐狸与葡萄》《狼与羔羊》《狗与它的影子》等。无论故事多么简单或荒唐，其中都有一个道德寓意。

Before we seek the heading from Timothy 3:16, under which to categorize this filthy, dirty story from the "Book of God," I am tempted to ask, as you would be tempted to ask: what is the moral (?) lesson that our children will learn from Tamar's sweet revenge? Of course we do tell our children, fables, not really for their entertainment value, but that through them some moral may be imparted." The Fox and the Grapes,'' "The Wolf and the Lamb,'' "The Dog and his Shadow," etc. However simple or silly the story, a moral is aimed at.

文中提到的美国心理学家弗农·琼斯博士（Dr. Vernon Jones）是一位有声望的学者，他对一些学童进行了实验。他给这些孩子讲述了一些故事。不同组的孩子所听的故事，主角都是同一个人，但主角对各组的表现却截然相反。对其中一组孩子来说，“圣乔治”斩杀恶龙，是一位十分勇敢的英雄形象；而对另一组孩子来说，他却在恐惧中逃跑，躲进母亲的怀里寻求庇护。“这些故事即便是在狭小的课堂环境中，也使性格发生了轻微却持久的改变，”琼斯博士总结道。

Dr. Vernon Jones, an American psychologist of repute, carried out experiments on groups of schoolchildren to whom certain stories had been told. The heroes of the stories were the same in the case of the different groups of children, but the heroes behaved contradictorily to each group. To one group "St. George," slaving the dragon emerged a very brave figure, but to another group, fleeing in terror and seeking shelter in his mother's lap. "THESE STORIES MADE CERTAIN SLIGHT BUT PERMANENT CHANGES IN CHARACTER, EVEN IN THE NARROW CLASSROOM SITUATION,'' concluded Dr. Jones.

《圣经》中的强奸、谋杀、乱伦和兽交等内容，对基督教世界儿童所造成的永久性伤害有多大，从我们日报的报道中便可见一斑。如果这就是西方道德的来源，那么卫理公会和罗马天主教会已经在他们的"上帝之家"中为同性恋者举行婚礼，也就不足为奇了。1979年7月，八千名"gays"（"同性恋者"的委婉说法，实指鸡奸者）在伦敦海德公园"展示其货色"，却受到新闻和电视媒体的喝彩。1

How much more permanent damage the rapes and murders, incests and beastialities of the "Holy Bible" has done to the children of Christendom, can be measured from reports in our daily newspapers. If such is the source of Western morality, it is no little wonder, then, that Methodists and Roman Catholics have already solemnized marriages between HOMOSEXUALS in their "Houses of God." And 8000 "gays" (an euphemistic term for sodomites) parade their "wares" in London's Hyde Park in July 1979, to the acclaim of the news and TV media. 1

你必须去拿一本《圣经》，读完创世记第38章全章。把值得如此“装饰”的词句用“红色”标出来。我们的道德（？）课讲到第18节——“于是她从他怀了孕”。 1. 从那时起，西方世界的主要城市，无论是伦敦、纽约、旧金山、悉尼、巴黎等，每年都举办同性恋游行（狂欢节），如今还有公众参与，甚至带着儿童前来观看。澳大利亚以悉尼被宣布为“世界同性恋之都”而自豪。

You must get that "Holy Bible" and read the whole chapter 38 of Genesis. Mark in "red" the words and phrases deserving this adornment. We had reached verse 18 in our moral (?) lesson — "AND SHE CONCEIVED BY HIM." 1. Ever since then, the major cities of the Western World; be it London, New York, San Francisco, Sydney, Paris etc hold annual gay parades (Mardi Gras), with now, public turnouts bringing in children as spectators. Australia prides itself in having Sydney being declared the gay capital of the world.

三个月后,事情果然如人们所料,犹大得知他的儿媳妇他玛行了"淫乱"之事,并且"因淫乱怀了孕"。"犹大说,把她带出来,用火烧死。"(创世记 38:24)。犹大先前曾因她是"女巫"而故意拒绝她,如今却残忍地想要将她烧死。但这位狡黠的犹太女子比这老人更胜一筹。她派仆人送去"戒指"、"手镯"和"手杖",恳求她的公公找出使她怀孕的人。犹大陷入了窘境。他承认自己的儿媳比自己"更有义",并且"以后不再与她同房"。(第26节)。比较不同译本如何描述同一事件的用词,是一种很有意思的体验。耶和华见证人的《新世界译本》将最后这句译为:"此后他没有再与她发生性关系。"[1] 这还不是我们最后一次在"神的书"中听到这位他玛,福音书作者们把她写入了他们"主的家谱"之中,使她名垂不朽。 1. 耶和华见证人的译本在措辞上更为直白。它毫不犹豫地直言其事!请将以西结书 23 章与其他任何译本相比较,便可看出其中的差别。

Three months later, as things were bound to turn out, news reached Judah that his daughter-in-law, Tamar, had played the "harlot" and that she was with "CHILD BY WHOREDOM AND JUDAH SAID, BRING HER FORTH, AND LET HER BE BURNT." (Genesis 38:24). Judah had deliberately spurned her as a "witch" and now he sadistically wants to burn her. But this wiley Jewess was one up on the old man. She sent the "ring," the "bracelet," and the "staff'' with a servant, beseeching her father-in-law to find the culprit responsible for her pregnancy. Judah was in a fix. He confessed that his daughter-in-law was more "RIGHTEOUS" than himself, and "HE KNEW HER AGAIN NO MORE." (verse 26). It is quite an experience to compare the choice of language in which the different Versions describe the same incident. The Jehovah's Witnesses in their "New World Translation" translate the last quotation as — "HE HAD NO FURTHER INTERCOURSE WITH HER AFTER THAT." 1 This is not the last we will hear about in the "Book of God" of this Tamar whom the Gospel writers have immortalized in their "Genealogy of their Lord." 1. The Jehovah's Witness Version is more explicit in its choice of words. It does not hesitate to call a spade a spade! Compare Ezekiel 23 with any other Version, and see the difference.

我不想拿细节来烦您，但创世纪第38章的末尾几节讲述了他玛腹中的一场争斗：两个双胞胎为争夺长子的地位而互相推挤。犹太人非常细致地记录他们的“长子”。长子能得到父亲产业的大部分。在这场产前竞赛中，谁是幸运的胜者？这场独特的争夺中有四个人。他们是犹大与他玛所生的“法勒斯”和“谢拉”。怎么回事？您马上就会看到。但首先，让我们谈谈道理。这段经文的教训是什么？您还记得er和俄南吗？他们因各自的罪过而被上帝毁灭。我们在每一种情况中所学到的教训是“责备”。在提摩太的哪一类别之下，您会把犹大的乱伦及其私生子嗣归类？这些人物都因其私生身份而在“上帝之书”中受到尊崇。他们成为“上帝独生子”（？）的曾祖父和曾祖母。见马太福音1:3。在每一种版本的圣经中，基督徒都把这些人物的名字拼写得与旧约（创世纪第38章）中的不同，与新约（马太福音第1章）中的拼写有所差异，以混淆读者的视线。从旧约的“法勒斯”到新约的“帕勒斯”，“谢拉”变为“泽拉”，“他玛”变为“他玛尔”。但道理是什么？上帝祝福犹大的乱伦之罪！所以如果你作恶（er），上帝会杀你；如果你浪费“种子”（俄南），上帝会杀你；但一个怀着报复心、狡诈地收集公公（犹大）“种子”的儿媳（拉玛）却得到了奖赏。基督徒会把这份“荣誉”归入“上帝之书”的哪一类别？它应当放在哪里？是您的……

I do not want to bore you with details, but the end verses of Genesis 38 deal with a duel in Tamar's womb: about the twins struggling for ascendancy. The Jews were very meticulous about recording their "first borns." The first born got the lion's share of their father's patrimony. Who are the lucky winners in this prenatal race? There are four in this unique contest. They are "PHAREZ and ZARAH of TAMAR by JUDAH.'' How? You will see presently. But first, let us have the moral. What is the moral in this episode? You remember Er and Onan: how God destroyed them for their several sins? And the lessons we have learnt in each case was "REPROOF'' Under what category of Timothy will you place the incest of Judah, and his illegitimate progeny? All these characters are honoured in the "Book of God" for their bastardy. They become the great grandfathers and great grandmothers of the "only begotten son of God'(?) See Matthew 1:3. In every Version of the Bible, the Christians have varied the spelling of these characters' names from those obtained in the Old Testament (Genesis chapter 38) with those contained in the New Testament (Matthew chapter 1) to put the reader off the scent. From PHAREZ in the "Old" to PARES in the "New,'' and ZARAH to ZARA and TAMAR to THAMAR, But what about the moral? God blesses Judah for his incestuous crime! So if you do "evil" (Er), God will slay you; if you spill "seed" (Onan), God will kill you, but a daughter-in-law (Lamat) who vengefully and guilefully collect her father-in-law's (Judah's) "seed" is rewarded. Under what category will the Christians place this "honour" in the "Book of God?" Where does it fit? Is it Your ...

教义?

1. DOCTRINE?

2. 责备？

2. REPROOF?

3. 纠正？还是 4. 引导向善？

3. CORRECTION? or 4. INSTRUCTION INTO RIGHTEOUSNESS?

问问那个敲你家门的人吧——那位职业布道者，那些激情布道的人，那些大声宣讲圣经的人。在这里，如果他能给出正确答案的解释，就应该得奖。世上没有任何人能够在上述任何标题之下为这种污秽、这种色情内容辩护。但必须给它一个标题。它只能被记录在这一项之下——"色情！"

Ask him who comes and knocks at your door — that professional preacher, that hot-gospeller, that Bible-thumper. Here, he deserves a prize if he can grant an explanation for the correct answer. There is none born who can justify this filth, this pornography under any of the above headings. But a heading has to be given. It can only be recorded under — "PORNOGRAPHY!"

乔治·伯纳德·肖(George Bernard Shaw)曾说:"世上最危险的书(《圣经》),要把它锁起来。"让孩子远离《圣经》吧。可是,谁会听从他的建议呢?他并不是"文学学士"(B.A.),也不是"重生"的基督徒。

George Bernard Shaw said that "THE MOST DANGEROUS BOOK (the Bible) ON EARTH, KEEP IT UNDER LOCK AND KEY." Keep the Bible out of your children's reach. But who will follow his advice? He was not a "B.A., 1 1 a "reborn" Christian.

根据南非基督教统治者的高尚道德标准，他们禁止了《查泰莱夫人的情人》一书，理由是其中有一个"四字母词"（tetragrammaton）。他们毫无疑问会禁止《圣经》，如果它是一部印度教或穆斯林的宗教典籍的话。然而，他们对自己的"圣书"却束手无策，因为他们的"救恩"全都依赖于它！

According to the high moral scruples of the Christian rulers of South African, who have banned the book, "Lady Chatterley's Lover,'' because of a "tetragrammaton" — a four-letter word, they would most assuredly have placed a ban on the "Holy Bible" if it had been a Hindu religious Book, or a Muslim religious Book. But they are utterly helpless against their own "Holy Book," their "SALVATION" depends upon it!

1. "B.A."是"born again"（重生）的缩写，这是一种新的邪教病。它摧毁了吉姆·琼斯牧师在圭亚那琼斯镇建立的"集体自杀邪教"。

1. "B.A." short for "born again" it is a new sickness. It destroyed the "SUICIDE CULT" of Rev. Jim Jones, in Jonestown, Guyana.

我同意萧伯纳的观点，应当把圣经“锁起来”，不让人随意接触，但我们需要这件武器来应对基督教的挑战。先知穆罕默德ﷺ说过“战争就是谋略”，而谋略要求我们使用敌人的武器。这并非我们喜欢或不喜欢的问题，而是我们不得不用来对付那些“唯一之书”（圣经）的学者们的武器，他们敲着我们的门，说“圣经是这样说的”“圣经是那样说的”。他们想让我们用他们的“圣经”来换掉我们神圣的古兰经。向他们指出他们尚未看见的“圣洁”中的漏洞吧。有时，这些“僵尸”会假装第一次看见污秽。他们被预先编程，带着经过挑选的经文去传播。

Read Genesis 19, verses 30 to the end and mark again in "red" the words and phrases deserving this honour. Do not hesitate and procrastinate. Your "coloured" Bible will become a priceless heirloom for your children. I agree with Shaw, to keep the Bible "under lock and key,'' but we need this weapon to meet the Christian challenge. The Prophet of Islam said that "WAR IS STRATEGY,'' and strategy demands that we use the weapons of our enemy. It is not what we like and what we do not like. It is what we are forced to use against the "ONE BOOK" (Bible) professors, who are knocking at our doors with "the Bible says this" and "the Bible says that." They want us to exchange our Holy Qur'an for their "Holy Bible." Show them the holes in the "holiness" which they have not yet seen. At times these zombies pretend to see the filth for the first time. They have been programmed with selected verses for their propagation.

然后，“历史”记载，罗得的女儿们夜复一夜地诱使醉酒的父亲，出于保存父亲“后裔”这一看似高尚（？）的动机。在这部“圣书”中，“种子”一词非常突出：仅在《创世记》这本小册子里就出现了四十七次！由此产生了另一段乱伦关系，也就产生了“亚扪人”和“摩押人”，据说以色列的神对他们怀有特别的怜悯。后来在圣经中我们读到，同一位充满怜悯的神命令犹太人毫不留情地屠杀非利士人——男人、女人和孩子。连树木和牲畜都不能幸免，但亚扪人和摩押人却不得被“骚扰”或“侵犯”，因为他们是罗得的后裔！（申命记 2:19）

To continue: the "history" has it that, night after night, the daughters of Lot seduce their drunken father with the noble (?) motive of preserving their father's "seed." "Seed" figures very prominently in this "Holy Book": forty seven times in the little booklet of Genesis alone! Out of this another incestuous relationship come the "Ammonites" and the "Moabites," for whom the God of Israel was supposed to have had a special compassion. Later on in the Bible we learn that the Jews are ordered by the same compassionate God to slaughter the Philistines mercilessly — men, women and children. Even trees and animals are not to be spared, but the Amonites and the Moabites are not to be "distressed" or "meddled" with because they are the seed of Lot! (Deuteronomy 2:19)

不体面的读者都无法把罗得被诱奸的情节念给自己的母亲、姐妹或女儿听，即使是念给一位贞洁端庄的未婚妻听也不行。然而，你会遇到一些变态之人，贪婪地享受这些污秽。口味是可以培养的！请再读以西结书第23章，留意其中的内容。这里讲的是两姊妹阿何拉和阿何利巴的“淫行”。其中的性细节，即使与许多被禁书籍的未删节版相比，也毫不逊色。请问你那些“重生”的基督徒访客，会把这些下流之语归入哪一类？这样的污秽，绝不应出现在任何“上帝之书”中。 阿勒-哈吉·A.D.阿吉奥拉在其著作《十字架的神话》中，精彩地揭露了圣经的谬误以及钉十字架之说的荒谬，简言之，揭露了整个基督教的虚妄。任何研究比较宗教的学生，都不应错过这部著作，还有前文提到的《圣经：上帝的话语还是人的话语？》。

No decent reader can read the seduction of Lot to his mother, sister or daughter, not even to his fiancee if she is a chaste and moral woman. Yet you will come across perverted people who will gorge this filth. Tastes can be cultivated! Read again and mark Ezekiel 23. You will know what colour to choose. The "whoredoms" of the two sisters, Aholah and Aholibah. The sexual details here puts to shame even the unexpurgated edition of many banned books. Ask your "born again" Christian visitors, under what category will they classify all this lewdness? Such filth certainly has no place in any "Book of God." Al-Haj A.D. Ajijola in his book — "The Myth of the Cross" gives a masterly expose of the fallacy of the Bible as well as of the crucifixion, in short, of the whole of Christianity. No student of comparative religion can afford to be without this publication and "THE BIBLE: Word of God or Word of Man?" mentioned earlier on.