看看基督教的教父们如何把旧约中乱伦的后裔强加到他们的主和救主耶稣基督身上，写进了新约。对于一个本没有家谱的人，他们编造了一份家谱。而这是怎样的家谱！六个通奸者和乱伦所生的后代被强加在这位神圣的神之人身上。按照神藉摩西所启示的律法，这些男人和女人本应被石头打死，并且在几代之内被驱逐，不得进入神的殿。1

Watch now how the Christian fathers have foisted the incestuous progenies of the Old Testament upon their Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ, in the New Testament. For a man who had no genealogy, they have manufactured one for him. And what a genealogy! Six adulterers and offsprings of incest are imposed upon this holy man of God. Men and women deserving to be stoned to death according to God's own law, as revealed through Moses, and further to be ostracised and debarred from the House of God for generations. 1

1. “私生子不得进入耶和华的会众，直到十代都不得进入。”（申命记 23:2 — 钦定本）“耶和华见证人”对这个词格外敏感。真是吞骆驼，却滤蚊子。

1. "The bastard shall not enter the congregation of the Lord even unto the tenth generation." (Deut. 23:2 — AV). The "Witnesses" have been hyper sensitive to this word. Swallowing the camel and straining at the gnat!

为什么上帝要给他的"儿子"（耶稣）安排一位"父亲"（约瑟）？又为什么要选择如此卑微的祖先？那个堕落的人说："这正是它的全部美妙之处。上帝爱罪人爱到不屑于为他的'儿子'选择这样的祖先。"

Why should God give a "father" (Joseph) to His "son" (Jesus)? And why such an ignoble ancestry? "This is the whole beauty of it" says the pervert. "God loved the sinners so much that he disdaineth not to give such progenitors for His 'son. "

在四位福音书作者中，上帝只"默示"了其中两位记录耶稣这位"儿子"的家谱。为了便于你比较两份"默示"名单中耶稣基督的"祖先"，我只保留了人名，去掉了其他文字。如下所示。在大卫与耶稣之间，上帝只"默示"马太记录了26位祖先。而路加同样"受默示"，却列出了41位先祖。在这两份名单中，大卫与耶稣之间唯一相同的名字是约瑟，而且按照路加福音3:23（AV）的说法，这位约瑟只是"被认为"的父亲。这个名字极为醒目，无需细查便能发现他，就是木匠约瑟。你也会很容易地看出，这两份名单彼此明显矛盾。这两份名单会不会都出自同一个来源，即上帝？

Of the four Gospel writers, God "inspired" only two of them to record the genealogy of His "son." To make it easy for you to compare the "fathers and grandfathers" of Jesus Christ in both the "inspired" lists, I have culled the names only, minus the verbiage. See below. Between David and Jesus, God "inspired" Matthew to record only 26 ancestors for His "son." But Luke, also "inspired," gathered up 41 forefathers for Jesus. The only name common to these two lists between David and Jesus is JOSEPH and that, too, a "supposed" father according to Luke 3:23 (AV). This one name is glaring. You need no fine-tooth comb to catch him. It is Joseph the carpenter. You will also easily observe that the lists are grossly contradictory. Could both the lists have emanated from the same source, i.e. God?

马太和路加过分热衷于把大卫立为君王，并将其视为耶稣的首要祖先，原因在于那个错误的观念：耶稣将坐在“他父亲大卫的宝座上”（使徒行传 2:30）。福音书否定了这一预言，因为它们告诉我们，耶稣没有坐在他父亲（大卫）的宝座上，反而是一位异教徒、罗马总督本丢·彼拉多坐在了那个宝座上，并将其所谓的合法（？）继承人耶稣判处死刑。福音作者说：“不要紧，如果不是在他第一次降临时应验，那么在他第二次降临时，他也会应验这个预言，以及另外三百个预言。”但是，他们过于热切地要把耶稣的血统在肉身上追溯到大卫（因为圣经确实是这样说的：“他肉身上是大卫后裔”，使徒行传 2:30，这是字面意义，而非比喻），结果这两位所谓“受默示”的作者在第一步便绊倒跌落了。

Matthew and Luke are over-zealous in making DAVID the King, the prime ancestor of Jesus, because of that false notion that Jesus was to sit on the "THRONE OF HIS FATHER DAVID" (Acts 2:30). The Gospels belie this prophecy, for they tell us that instead of Jesus sitting on his father's (David's) throne, it was Pontious Pilate, a Roman Governor, a pagan who sat on that very throne and condemned its rightful (?) heir (Jesus) to death. "Never mind,'' says the evangelist, "if not in his first coming, then in his second coming he will fulfill this prophecy and three hundred others beside" But with their extravagant enthusiasm to trace the ancestry of Jesus physically to David, (for this is actually what the Bible says — THAT OF THE FRUIT OF HIS (David's) LOINS, ACCORDING TO THE FLESH" (literally, not metaphorically Acts 2:30), both the "inspired" authors trip and fall on the very first step.

马太福音1:6说耶稣是通过所罗门而成为大卫的后裔,但路加福音3:31却说他(耶稣)是通过拿单而成为大卫的后裔。无需是妇科医生也能看出,大卫的血脉不可能同时经由所罗门和拿单到达耶稣的母亲那里!我们知道两位作者都是彻头彻尾的骗子,因为耶稣是神迹般受孕的,没有任何男性的介入。即使我们承认他在肉身上源自大卫,两位作者仍会因同样显而易见的理由被证明是骗子。

Matthew 1:6 says that Jesus was the son of David through SOLOMON, but Luke 3:31 says that he (Jesus) was the son of David through NATHAN. One need not be a gynecologist to tell that by no stretch of the imagination could the seed of David reach the mother of Jesus both through Solomon and Nathan at the same time! We know that both the authors are confounded liars, because Jesus was conceived miraculously, without any male intervention. Even if we concede a physical ancestry through David, both authors would still be proved liars for the obvious reason.

虽然这一逻辑十分简单,但这位基督徒情绪投入太深,这一道理难以进入他那带有偏见的头脑。让我们举一个相同的例子,但这次是他可以保持客观的情形。

As simple as the above logic is, the Christian is so emotionally involved that it will not penetrate his prejudiced mind. Let us give him an identical example, but one where he can afford to be objective.

我们从历史得知，伊斯兰教的先知穆罕默德是亚伯拉罕通过以实玛利之子，因此，若有某位所谓“受启示”的作者出来，宣称穆罕默德是亚伯拉罕通过以撒之子，我们会毫不迟疑地斥其为骗子，因为亚伯拉罕的后裔不可能同时通过以实玛利和以撒抵达阿米娜（穆罕默德的母亲）。这两个亚伯拉罕之子的血统差异，正是犹太人与阿拉伯人的差异。

We know from history that Muhammed the Prophet of Islam, was the son of Abraham through ISHMAEL, so if some "inspired" writer came along and tried to palm off his "revelation" to the effect that Muhummed was the son of Abraham through ISAAC, we would, without any hesitation, brand such a writer as a liar, because the seed of Abraham could never reach Amina (Muhummed's mother) through Ishmael and through Isaac at the same time! The differences of lineage between these two sons of Abraham is the difference between the JEWS and the ARABS.

如果就穆罕默德而言,我们便会知道,凡说以撒是他的祖先的人,都是说谎者。但就耶稣而言,马太福音和路加福音都受到怀疑。在基督徒决定他们更偏爱哪一条祖先的谱系来称呼他们的“神”之前,这两部福音书都将不得不被摒弃。两千年来,基督教世界一直在与这些家谱殊死搏斗,试图解开这个谜团。他们至今仍未放弃。我们敬佩他们的毅力。他们仍然相信“时间会解决这个问题”。也许还要再等两千年?!“有一些被宣称的矛盾,神学家至今未能令每一位无神论者满意地解决。有一些文本上的困难,学者们仍在苦苦思索。只有对圣经一窍不通的人才会否认这些以及其他问题。”——《真理之言》,1975年7月。

In the case of Muhummed, we would know then that anyone who says that Isaac is his progenitor, was a liar. But in the case of Jesus both Matthew and Luke are suspect. Until the Christians decide which line of ancestors they prefer for their "god," both Gospels will have to be rejected. Christendom has been battling tooth and nail with these genealogies for the past 2000 years, trying to unravel the mystery. They have not given up yet. We admire their perseverance. They still believe that "TIME WILL SOLVE THE PROBLEM." Perhaps another 2000 years?! "THERE ARE CLAIMED CONTRADICTIONS THAT THEOLOGIANS HAVE NOT RESOLVED TO EVERY ATHEIST'S SATISFACTION. THERE ARE TEXTUAL DIFFICULTIES WITH WHICH SCHOLARS ARE STILL WRESTLING. ONLY A BIBLE ILLITERATE WOULD DENY THESE AND OTHER PROBLEMS" "The Plain Truth," July 1975.

我们已经把马太福音和路加福音的大约85%归于马可福音或那个神秘的"Q"来源。2 现在让我们来看看，是谁"启发"了路加，使他把耶稣的故事讲给他"最尊贵的提阿非罗"（路加福音1:3）听。以下是路加对他"福音书"的序言。他清楚地告诉我们，他只是在追随其他人的脚步，而那些人的资历不如他，却竟敢为他的英雄（耶稣）writing记述。作为医生，相比渔夫和税吏，他无疑更有能力创作一部文学杰作。他这样做，是因为"我也觉得这样好"，要"按次序写出来"。这些是他相对于前人的主要理由。

We have already nailed 85% of Matthew and Luke to Mark or that "mysterious 'Q''’. 1 Let us now allow Luke to tell us who "inspired" him to tell his "most excellent Theophilus" (Luke 1:3) the story of Jesus. See below for Luke's preamble to his "Gospel." He tells us plainly that he was only following in the footsteps of others who were less qualified than himself, others who had the temerity to write accounts of his hero (Jesus). As a physician, as against fishermen and tax collectors, he was no doubt better equipped to create a literary masterpiece. This he did, because "IT SEEMED GOOD TO ME ALSO" to "PUT IN ORDER." These are his prominent Justifications over his predecessors.

在他翻译的《路加福音》导言中，基督教学者J. B. 菲利普斯（J. B. Phillips）有如下论述：“路加自己承认，他仔细比较并编辑了现有材料，但似乎他还接触过大量其他材料，我们可以合理地推测他所依据的一些来源。”然而你们却称这是神的话语？！请索取FONTANA出版社出版的平装本《现代英语福音书》（The Gospels in Modern English）。这是一个廉价版本。请尽快购买，以免基督徒们决定删去菲利普斯译本中宝贵的注释！如果《修订标准版》（RSV）的作者们也决定删去其译本中的“序言”2 2，也不必惊讶。这是一个由来已久的老习惯。一旦那些在基督教中有既得利益的人意识到他们无意中泄露了天机，他们就会迅速补救。他们会在一夜之间把我目前的引证变成“过去”的历史！ 1. 参见第六章。

In the introduction to his translation of the "Gospel of St Luke" A Christian scholar, J. B. Phillips, has this to say — "ON HIS OWN ADMISSION LUKE HAS CAREFULLY COMPARED AND EDITED EXISTING MATERIAL, BUT IT WOULD SEEM THAT HE HAD ACCESS TO A GOOD DEAL OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL, AND WE CAN REASONABLY GUESS AT SOME OF THE SOURCES FROM WHICH HE DREW." And yet you call this the Word of God?! Obtain "The Gospels in Modern English" in soft cover by 'FONTANA' publications. It is a cheap edition. Get it quickly before the Christians decide to have Phillips' invaluable notes expunged from his translation! And do not be surprised if the authors of the RSV also decide to eliminate the "Preface" 2 2 from their translation. It is an old, old habit. As soon as those who have vested interests in Christianity realize that they have inadvertently let the cat out of the bag, they quickly make amends. They make my current references "past" history overnight! 1. Refer to Chapter Six.

2. 请参阅第三章。

2. Refer to Chapter Three.

谁是《约翰福音》的作者？既不是上帝，也不是圣约翰！请看第58页上他（？）自己对此的说法——约翰福音19:35和21:24-25。他的"他"（？）、"他的"和"这"指的是谁？还有他的"我们知道"和"我想"。会不会是那个在花园里最需要他的时候却背弃他的善变之人，或是在"最后的晚餐"桌旁的第十四个人，那个"耶稣所爱的"门徒？两人都名叫约翰。这是耶稣时代犹太人中以及今天基督徒中都很流行的名字。这两人都不是这部福音书的作者。这部福音书出自一位佚名者之手，这一点是再清楚不过的。

Who is the author of "The Gospel of St. John?" Neither God nor St. John! See what "he" (?) says about it "himself" (?) on page 58 — John 19:35 and 21:24-25. Who is his "HE" and "HIS" and "THIS?" A-N-D, his "WE KNOW" and "I SUPPOSE." Could it be the fickle one who left him in the lurch in the garden, when he was most in need, or the fourteenth man at the table, at the "last Super," the one that "Jesus loved?" Both were Johns. It was a popular name among the Jews in the times of Jesus, and among Christians even now. Neither of these two was the author of this Gospel. That it was the product of an anonymous hand, is crystal clear.

让我用这32位学者的裁决来结束这场关于"作者身份"的考察，他们背后有50个合作的宗派支持。上帝早已被排除在这场作者之争之外。在"Collins"出版的RSV（修订标准版）中，其书末附有关于"圣经各卷"的宝贵注释。我在下面仅转录其中的一小部分。我们从"创世记"开始——圣经的第一卷。学者们对其"作者"的说明是："'摩西五经'之一。"请注意，"摩西五经"一词被放在引号中——" "。这是一种含蓄的表态，承认这是人们的说法——即这是摩西的书，摩西是其作者，但我们（这32位学者）见识更为深广，并不认同这种以讹传讹的流言。

Let me conclude this "authorship" search with the verdict of those 32 scholars, backed by their 50 co-operating denominations. God had been eliminated from this authorship race long ago. In the RSV by "Collins," invaluable notes on "The Books of the Bible" are to be found at the back of their production. I am reproducing only a bit of that information on below. We start with "GENESIS" — the first book of the Bible. The scholars say about its "AUTHOR": "One of the 'five books of Moses'." Note the words "five books of Moses" are written in inverted commas — " " This is a subtle way of admitting that this is what people say — that it is the book of Moses, that Moses was its author, but we (the 32 scholars) who are better informed, do not subscribe to that tittle-tattel.

以下是这四本书：《出埃及记》《利未记》《民数记》《申命记》。作者？"一般认为是摩西所著。"这与《创世记》属于同一类。

The next four books, "EXODUS, LEVITICUS, NUMBERS and DEUTERONOMY": AUTHOR? "Generally credited to Moses." This is the same category as the book of Genesis.

问：《士师记》的作者是谁？答：“可能是撒母耳。” 问：《约书亚记》的作者是谁？答：“大部分被归于约书亚。” 问：《路得记》的作者是谁？答：“尚不能确定。” 问：以下这本书的作者是谁：

Who is the author of the book of "JUDGES?" Answer: "Possibly Samuel." Who is the author of the book of "JOSHUA?" Answer: "Major part credited to Joshua." Who is the author of "RUTH?" Answer: "Not definitely known" AND Who is the author of:

《撒母耳记上》？............ 答：作者"佚名"。

1ST SAMUEL?............ Answer: Author "Unknown".

2ND SAMUEL........... Answer: Author "Unknown". Note: The source text here is a Bible book title and an answer line; translating faithfully: 《撒母耳记下》........... 答案：作者“不详”。

2ND SAMUEL........... Answer: Author "Unknown".

第一位国王？................. 答：作者"未知"。

1ST KING?................. Answer: Author "Unknown".

2ND KING?............... 答案：作者"未知" 1st CHRONICLES? …. 答案：作者"未知，大概……"

2ND KING?............... Answer: Author "Unknown" 1st CHRONICLES? …. Answer: Author "Unknown, probably …".

2 Chronicles? …. Answer: Author "Likely collected …". Wait — the rules say to translate the user's text faithfully, so here it is. 2 Chronicles? …… 答：作者"很可能收集了……"。

故事就是这样。这些无名氏书籍的作者要么是“未知”，要么“很可能”、“或许”，或者来源“存疑”。那么，为何要把这场闹剧归咎于上帝呢？那位忍耐和怜悯的上帝，并没有等上两千年，等圣经学者来告诉我们，这些犹太人的过错、骄傲与偏见，他们的情欲、争吵、嫉妒与恶行，并非出自祂的启示。祂早已公开宣告了他们所做的一切：

And so the story goes. The authors of these anonymous books are either "UNKNOWN" or are "PROBABLY" or "LIKELY" or are of "DOUBTFUL" origin. Why blame God for this fiasco? The Long-suffering and Merciful God did not wait for two thousand years for Bible scholars to tell us that He was not the Author of Jewish peccadilloes, prides and prejudices; of their lusts, wranglings, jealousies and enormities. He said it openly what they do:-

我们本可以以上述古兰经经文作为本书论点的开端，并以之作结，满足于真主至高无上已亲自对这一问题作出裁决——"圣经是真主的话语吗？"但我们希望给予基督徒兄弟一个机会，尽可能客观地研究这一问题。2让信仰的基督徒、"重生"的基督徒，以及他们自己的圣书《圣经》，来为他们那"更好"的判断作证。

We could have started the thesis of this book with the above Qur'anic verse and ended with it, with the satisfaction that God Almighty had Himself delivered His verdict on the subject — "Is the Bible God's Word?", but we wished to afford our Christian brethern an opportunity to study the subject as objectively as they wished.2Allowing believing Christians, "reborn" Christians, and their own Holy Book the Bible to testify against their "better" judgement.

圣古兰经又如何呢?《古兰经》是真主的圣言吗?本小册子的作者曾努力以最科学的方式回答这一问题。其著作《古兰经——奇迹中的奇迹》可应要求从"中心"免费索取。

What about the Holy Qur’ân? Is the Qur’ân the Word of God? The author of this humble publication has endeavoured to answer this question in a most scientific manner in his book "AL'QUR'AN — The Miracle of Miracles" available absolutely free of charge from the "Centre" on request.

1. “圣经”——“全世界最畅销的书！”仅RSV（修订标准版）的首版，出版商就获得了1500万美元的净利润。“用永恒换来的，竟是如此微薄的代价！” 2. 参见第5章中斯克罗吉博士的恳切呼吁。

1. "THE BIBLE" - "The World's Best Seller!" the Publishers of the RSV made a net profit of 15 000 000 dollars on the first edition alone' "What a miserable price in exchange for eternity!" 2. See Dr Scroggie's plea in chapter 5.

读者如今想必已经确信——前提是他有开放的心态——《圣经》并非基督教护教者所声称的那样。

The reader must by now be convinced, that is if he has an open mind, that the Bible is not what it is claimed to be by the protagonists of Christianity.

几十年来，常有人问我，为什么我对《圣经》和基督教有如此"深入"的了解。

For nearly four decades people have asked me as to how I have such an "in depth" knowledge of the Bible and Christianity.

坦白说,我目前作为穆斯林“专家”研究犹太教和基督教的身份,并非出于我自己的意愿。我是被迫成为现在这个样子的。

Frankly speaking my present position as a Muslim "expert" on Judaism and Christianity is not of my own volition. I have been forced into being what I am.

1939年，我在一家名为Adams Mission的商店当店员，那里靠近一所同名的基督教神学院，培养传教士和神父。我和其他穆斯林同事常常成为那些有志成为神职人员的年轻人攻击的目标。几乎每天，这些年轻的基督徒都会骚扰我和我的穆斯林兄弟，对伊斯兰教、先知穆罕默德ﷺ和《古兰经》极尽侮辱之能事。

It was in 1939 when I was working as a shop assistant at Adams Mission near a Christian seminary by that name; producing preachers and priests, that I and my fellow Muslim workers were the target of young aspiring men of the cloth. Not a day passed when these young Christians did not harass me or my brothers-in-faith, through insults which they piled on Islam, the Holy Prophet and the Qur’ân.

作为一个二十岁的敏感青年，我曾为无法捍卫那位比我的生命更珍贵的人而彻夜流泪——那位对全人类都充满慈悲的人——穆罕默德ﷺ。

Being a sensitive young man of 20, I spent sleepless nights in tears for not being able to defend the one dearer to me than my own life, that mercy unto all mankind— Muhummed P.B.U.H.

我下定决心研读《古兰经》、《圣经》以及其他文献。我发现《IZHARUL HAQ》（《显明真理》）这本书，成了我人生的转折点。不久之后，我便能够邀请亚当斯传教学院的见习传教士，让他们为此冒出冷汗，直到他们开始敬重伊斯兰教及其圣使ﷺ。

I resolved to study the Qur’ân, the Bible and other literature. My discovery of the book — "IZHARUL HAQ" was the turning point in my life. After a short while I was able to invite the trainee missionaries of Adams Mission College and cause them to perspire under the collar until they developed a respect for Islam and its Holy Apostle.

这让我思考：许多缺乏警觉的穆斯林不断受到挨家挨户传教的基督教福音派人士的"攻击"，而这些热情好客的穆斯林却邀请他们进屋。我想到那位无情的传教士一边大口吃着萨莫萨（samoosa）一边用尖刻的言语贬低这位穆斯林的信仰，把他驳得哑口无言。

It made me ponder as to how so many unwary Muslims are being constantly assaulted by Christian evangelists who carry out a door to door campaign, and being invited in by the proverbially hospitable Muslim, I thought of how the merciless missionary munched the samoosas and punched the wind out of the Muslim with snide remarks against his beliefs.

下定决心要让穆斯林明白他们自卫的权利，并使他们具备足够的知识，去应对热衷布道的福音传道者、挨家挨户推销基督教的传教者，以及无耻诋毁伊斯兰教及其圣使的人，我谦卑地承担起讲学的任务，向广大穆斯林群众表明：他们无需畏惧基督徒的攻击。

Determined to bring home to the Muslims their right to defend themselves and to arm them with enough knowledge to counter the hot gospeller, the door to door pedlar of Christianity and the shameless insulter of Islam and its Holy Apostle; I humbly undertook to deliver lectures to show the Muslim masses that they had nothing to fear from the assaults of the Christians.

我的讲座也是对基督徒的一种邀请，邀请他们见证伊斯兰教的真理，以及那些渗入耶稣（愿主赐他平安）真实教导之中的虚构内容。

My lectures were also an invitation to the Christians to witness the truth of Islam and the fabrications which had penetrated the true teachings of Jesus (P.B.U.H).

在过去一百多年里，基督教传教士对穆斯林提出了许多方面的质疑，据我所知，其中不少已经得到解答，或者得到了部分解答。如果蒙真主的意愿，我在这一领域的贡献也能为伊斯兰的批评者们的质疑提供解答或部分解答。我们绝不能因循懈怠，这一点至关重要。

Christian Missionaries in the past hundred years and more have challenged Muslims on many aspects and quite a number of these challenges have, to my knowledge, gone answered or have been partly answered. Perhaps by the will of Allah my contribution in this field can also be answers or part answers to the challenges of the detractors of Islam. It is of supreme importance that we do not go by default.

一个这样的挑战浮现在我脑海中，即Geo G. Harris所著的《如何引领穆斯林归向基督》一书。这位曾试图使中国穆斯林皈依基督教的传教士，以西方人惯有的傲慢和居高临下的口吻，在第19页"腐化之说或指控"的标题下写道："我们现在来谈穆斯林世界对我们基督教圣经提出的最严重的指控。这一指控有三个方面。"

One such challenge comes to mind viz. Geo G. Harris the author of "How to lead Muslims to Christ". This missionary who tried to convert the Muslims of China says in the usual arrogant and condecending manner of the Westerner on page 19 under the heading — "THE THEORY OR CHARGE OF CORRUPTION." "WE NOW COME TO THE MOST SERIOUS CHARGE BY THE MOSLEM WORLD, AGAINST OUR CHRISIIAN SCRIPTURES. THERE ARE THREE ASPECTS OF THIS CHARGE.

1. 基督教的经典已被如此大幅地改动和篡改，以至于它们与《古兰经》所赞美的那部光荣的福音书（Injil）几乎没有相似之处，即使有也寥寥无几。对此，可以提出以下问题之一来回应：这些经典究竟在哪些地方被如此改动或篡改了？你能否找到一部真正的福音书，让我拿来与我的版本作比较？在历史上的哪个时期，未经篡改的福音书曾经流传？

1. That the Christian scriptures have been so changed and altered that they bear little, if any, resemblance to the glorious Injil praised in the Qur’ân. This can be answered by the asking of one of the following questions: Wherein have these been so changed or altered? Can you obtain a copy of a true Injil and show it that I may compare it with mine? At what date in past history was the unaltered Injil in circulation?

2. 我们的福音书遭到了篡改。以下五个问题是明确的，我们完全有权提出：(a) 这种篡改或改动是否出于故意？

2. That our Gospels have suffered corruption. The following five questions are definite and we have a perfect right to ask them; (a) Was such corruption or alteration intentional?

（b）你能在我的《圣经》中指出一段这样的经文吗？

(b) Can you point out in my Bible one such passage?

I don't have a prior passage from our conversation to refer to. This is the first message I've received from you, and it contains only the label "(c) How did this passage read originally?", so there is no text in it to translate. Please paste the passage you'd like translated into Chinese (Simplified), and I'll translate it following the rules above.

(c) How did this passage read originally?

穆斯林难道就没有这些问题的答案吗?亲爱的读者,如果你读过这本书,你就会承认Ceo G. Harris站不住脚。我已经能够引用圣经的具体页码来驳斥他的论断。

Have we as Muslims no answers for these questions? If you, gentle reader have read this book you will admit that Ceo G. Harris has no feet to stand on. I have been able to give actual pages from the Bible to disprove his assertions.

根据第16页，Geo G. Harris在他的书中向他的同伴传授了一条基本的传教规则，以便将可能皈依的穆斯林逼入绝境。

On page 16 of Geo G. Harris' book he teaches his comrades a basic missionary rule in order to corner the Muslim prospective:

在本章中，假定穆斯林已经提出了我们圣经的真实性与可靠性问题。既然如此，在我们着手为自己的立场辩护之前，应当牢记一条基本原则：举证的责任在穆斯林一方。

"In this chapter it is assumed that the question of the authenticity and genuineness of our scriptures has been raised by the Mohammedan. When this is the case, before we undertake defense of our position we should bear in mind a basic rule. THE BURDEN OF PROOF RESTS WITH THE MOSLEM." 1

感谢真主，在我四十年来驳斥《圣经》真实性的过程中，那些大胆向我提出挑战的基督徒，最终都被我驳倒了。

Praise be to Allah that in my 40 years of disproving the authenticity of the Bible which the Christians have so boldly asked for, I have been able to win the day.

我们穆斯林不会挨家挨户地兜售我们的宗教。而基督教各宗派的人却侵犯我们的隐私与安宁，利用我们的好客之道来骚扰那些毫无防备的穆斯林。

Remember, we Muslims do not go door to door peddling our religion. Whereas Christians of different denominations encroach upon our privacy and peace and take advantage of our hospitality to harass the unwary Musalman.

那些在这些基督徒挑衅、甚至辱骂我们敬爱的先知穆罕默德ﷺ时，不敢坦然说出真相的人，应当重新审视自己的信仰。

Those who are afraid to project the truth when they are provoked by these Christians, who even go to the extent of insulting our beloved Nabee Muhummed (S.A.W.) should re-examine their Eemaan.

我举办这些讲座，是为了揭穿那些鬼鬼祟祟的传教士，他们对那些本分过日子、不知情的穆斯林的家园"发动攻击"。

The lectures I hold are to sound out these slinking missionaries who "attack" the home and hearth of the unsuspecting Muslim who goes about minding his own business.

这些讲座也旨在恢复穆斯林那受损的尊严，那尊严已被基督教传教小贩的残酷攻击所扰乱。请询问夏茨沃思、汉诺威公园或里弗利亚的贫困穆斯林，他们是如何遭受某些传教士的暴政的。

The lectures are also aimed at restoring the damaged dignity of the Muslim who has been ruffled by the ruthless attacks of the Christian pedlar. Ask the poor Muslims of Chatsworth, Hanover Park or Riverlea2 as to how they are subjected to the tyrany of certain missionaries.

如果我这份微薄的小作品《圣经是神的话语吗？》能在穆斯林家庭中占有一席之地，成为抵御传教士威胁的堡垒，我的努力便已得到充分的回报。

If this humble little contribution of mine "Is the Bible God's Word?" finds a place in the Muslim home as a bulwark against the missionary menace my effort would be amply rewarded.

如果能使哪怕一位真诚的耶稣门徒得以归向真理，摆脱捏造与虚妄，那将是更大的回报。