另一种观点向乌玛提出的主张是：应当与统治者作战，并通过武装斗争使伊斯兰重返世界舞台。这种观点同样以某段圣训为依据。许多传述途径，包括伊玛目穆斯林所传，都记载先知ﷺ说：“除非你们看到明显的反信（Kufr），并且拥有来自真主的明确证据（即来自伊斯兰的依据），否则不要挑战掌权者。”伊本·凯西尔在其《古兰经注》中指出，如果哈里发复归于不信的统治，就应当与他作战，直到他重新实施伊斯兰和沙里亚。

Another view that is being addressed to the Ummah is the concept of fighting the rulers and that through military struggle Islam will return to the world stage. Again this is based upon a particular Hadith. It has been narrated from many sources including Imam Muslim that the Prophet (saw) said, “Do not challenge the people of authority unless you see explicit Kufr of which you have clear proof from Allah(from Islam)”. Ibn Kathir in his Tafseer states that if the Khaleefah reverts to the rule of disbelief, he would be fought until he returned to the implementation of Islam and the Shari’ah.

伊本·哈哲尔在其《法特哈·巴里》中也指出，如果统治者变成卡菲尔，或改变伊斯兰教法，就应当对其进行讨伐并将其罢黜。这一观点也见于《奈勒·奥塔尔》，并得到沙卡尼的支持。也就是说，如果统治者以非伊斯兰教法统治，就应当对其进行讨伐，直到他悔改或被罢黜。然而，这仅适用于这一种情况，即哈里发以卡夫尔的裁决进行统治、违抗安拉的情形。它并不涉及哈里发变得暴虐，也不涉及其品行变坏的情形。在这些情况下，服从他是有约束力的，穆斯林仍应在他身后礼拜，并在他率领下参加圣战。

Ibn Hajr in his Fateh al-Bari also states that if he becomes a Kafir, or changes the Shari’ah he should be fought and removed. This view is also mentioned in Nayl al-Awtar and supported by Imam Shawkani. That is, if the ruler rules by other than the Shari’ah he is fought until he either repents or is removed. However that is the only situation that it applies to i.e. the ruling of a Khaleefah who resorts to the Kufr ruling and disobedience to Allah. It does not relate to the Khaleefah becoming tyrannical and also does not relate to his personality becoming corrupt. In which case obedience to him is binding and the Muslims should still pray behind him and fight Jihad behind him.

然而，这些圣训与当前的情况并无关联。它们都与叛乱和反抗哈里发有关，并且归在“Khurooj min al Khaleefah”这一主题之下，即反抗哈里发或伊玛目的权威。

However, these Ahadith are not connected to the current situation. They are all connected to revolt and rising against the Khaleefah and are titled under the subject of ‘Khurooj min al Khaleefah’ i.e. rising against the authority of a Khaleefah or an Imam.

当前的情况，并不像那些曾经依伊斯兰统治、后来背离伊斯兰的哈里发的情况。当前的问题也不仅仅是通过杀死统治者来罢免他。实际上，六十多年来，整套的库夫尔制度一直在穆斯林身上推行，没有一位统治者依照沙里亚统治过，他们中没有任何一位是哈里发制度中的哈里发。他们所实行的制度，要么是君主制，要么是带有某种民主框架的资本主义。因此，现实并非是在伊斯兰国家之内罢免一位不良的哈里发。现实是要连根铲除整套库夫尔制度，包括其统治者，从而再次建立伊斯兰之地（Dar ul-Islam）。当前的统治者，无论如何都不能与那些曾在哈里发国家中引入某一项库夫尔法律的哈里发相提并论。因此，这些圣训——它们一直都是在伊斯兰之地的语境下被理解的，即伊斯兰得以实行、穆斯林拥有安全的地方——并不适用于当前的情况。它们所针对的现实，是在伊斯兰国家之内罢免一位以库夫尔统治的哈里发，而不是仅仅通过与该制度的统治者作战并杀死他，来连根铲除整个库夫尔制度。

The current situation is not that of the Khulafaa’ who used to rule by Islam and then turned away from Islam. The current problem is also not merely related to removing a ruler by killing him. Rather, entire systems of Kufr have been implemented over Muslims for over 76 years, none of the rulers have ever ruled by the Shari’ah and none of them are Khulafaa’ within a Khilafah. The systems that they are applying are either monarchies or Capitalistic with some sort of democratic framework. Hence, the reality isn’t that of removing a bad Khaleefah within an Islamic State. The reality is of uprooting an entire Kufr system, including it’s ruler, to again establish Dar ul-Islam. The current rulers are not comparable in any way to Khulafaa’ who have introduced one Kufr law into the Khilafah. Hence these Ahadith, which have always been understood in the context of Dar ul-Islam i.e. where Islam is implemented and the Muslims possess the security, do not apply upon the current situation. The reality which they address is that of removing a Khaleefah who rules with Kufr within the Islamic State, not that of uprooting an entire Kufr system merely by fighting and killing the ruler of that system.

唯一能从经据中找到可与之相比的情形，是先知（ﷺ）首次建立伊斯兰国家，以及他（ﷺ）为建立这一国家、将Dar ul-Kufr转变为Dar ul-Islam所经历的奋斗。这正是他（ﷺ）在哈姆扎圣训中所指的奋斗，也如《逊奈》和《传记》之书所阐明的那样。因为这是唯一一个曾存在完整的Kufr制度、并被转变为完整的伊斯兰制度的范例。所以问题所涉及的是制度的更替，而不仅仅是统治者的更换。关于战斗的圣训，适用于更换统治者，即一位已经迷失的哈里发，而不是更换制度；只有先知（ﷺ）在麦加的奋斗，才适用于制度的更替。因此，军事斗争不是重建哈里发制度的方法。

The only situation that is comparable from the evidences is the establishment of the Islamic State for the very first time by the Prophet (saw) and the struggle which he (saw) went through in order to establish this State and change Dar ul-Kufr to Dar ul-Islam. This is the struggle which he (saw) referred to in the Hadith of Hamza and as is illustrated in the Books of Sunnah and Seerah. As that is the only instance in which a complete system of Kufr existed and was changed to a complete system of Islam. So the matter is regarding the changing of a system, not merely a ruler. The Ahadith of fighting, apply to changing a ruler i.e. a Khaleefah who has gone astray not a system, only the struggle of the Prophet (saw) in Makkah applies to the changing of a system. So military struggle is not the method of re-establishing the Khilafah.