The ‘Illah is the Baa’ith (reason or motive) for the legislation and it is taken from the text (An-Nass). There are however texts which appear to contain the meaning of reasoning according to the tools of reasoning utilised or in accordance to the composition of the sentence. Despite that there are other Qaraa’in (indicators or connotations), whether they are found within the text or not, which negate the meaning of reasoning whilst establishing another meaning which represents the Ghaayah (aim) of the legislator that is being targeted through the legislation.

This aim (Ghaayah) or result (Nateejah) that explains what has been intended from the Hukm by the Shaari’ (legislator) has been provided with the terminological naming of ‘Al-Hikmah’ (the wisdom) and it is not an ‘Illah because it is not the reason for the legislation.

Examples of these texts that include this ‘Hikmah’ include:

His Qawl Ta’Aalaa:

Rahmah (mercy) represents a description for the Sharee’ah in terms of the result of its application or implementation whilst it does not represent an ‘Illah for its legislation. That is because its Seeghah (form) does not indicate At-Ta’leel (reasoning). Consequently, the aspect of reasoning is negated and the Hikmah of the legislation of the Sharee’ah is Rahmah (mercy).

Allah Ta’Aalaa said:

Witnessing of benefits in Hajj is a Hikmah and not an ‘Illah and so the Hajj of the one who performs it is valid if he witnesses benefits i.e. from buying and selling and his Hajj is also valid if he does not undertake any buying and selling. That is because the witnessing of the benefits or practising them is not an ‘Illah for Hajj. The witnessing of benefits is consequently a Hikmah of Hajj which could be realised by the one performing Hajj just as they may not be realised by him.

Similarly, the Hikmah of the prayer is that it prevents the one who performs it from engaging in the Muharramaat (prohibited matters and acts) because the Salaah strengthens the relationship between the ‘Abd (servant) and His Rabb (Lord) and this connection makes him more fearful of committing the Haraam acts. However, some of those who perform the prayer commit some of the prohibited acts whilst it has not been demanded or required from them to repeat their prayer and their prayer is regarded as valid even if it has not prevented him from performing immoral acts (Al-Fahshaa’) and AlMunkar (Muharramaat).

Consequently, this Hikmah of the Salaah could be realised and attained just as it may not be realised even if in most cases it will be accomplished because it represents the Hikmah from Allah. Despite that it does not represent the ‘Illah of the Salaah as it is not the reason for the legislation of the Salaah. Rather it represents the aim (or intended result) of the legislation of the Salaah and no Qiyaas is undertaken upon this aim (Al-Ghaayah).

Another example is the Qawl of Allah Ta’Aalaa:

Here, the family of Fir’aun did not take in Mousaa (as) and care for him for the sake of him becoming an enemy to them and a source of grief for them. Rather it only the result of what Allah Ta’Aalaa had intended and this result represents the Hikmah of Allah from the family of Fir’aun picking up Mousaa (as) from the river. It is therefore not an ‘Illah and Qiyaas (analogy) is not made upon it.

The Hikmah like the ‘Illah must have a Shar’iy text to indicate it however it differs from the ‘Illah as Qiyaas is not made upon it like the ‘Illah.

It represents what Allah Ta’Aalaa intended and His Hikmah (wisdom) behind the Hukm (ruling) or the Sharee’ah. Therefore, none but Allah knows it and it is not possible for us to become knowledgeable of the Hikmah of Allah unless He Ta’Aalaa has made us aware of it through a text by way of the Wahi (divinely inspired revelation). It is like the Akhbaar (informing), the exhortations and Irshaad (guidance) and consequently, unlike the ‘Illah, it is not involved in or part of the Istinbaat (deduction process) of the Ahkaam Ash-Shar’iyah From amongst the differences between the ‘Illah and the Hikmah is that the ‘Illah is a Wasf Zhaahir Mundabit Mahdood and Mufhim (A description that is apparent, consistent, limited/definied and open to the understanding of reasoning). The Shaari’ (legislator) brought it in a text to explain the matter that was behind (motive) of the Hukm Ash-Shar’iy (i.e. the reason for its legislation). This is whilst the Hikmah is a Wasf Munaasib Lil-Hukm (a description that is fitting for the Hukm) that is realised or attained in most circumstances as a result of fulfilling the ruling. It is not Mundabit or Mahdood (consistent and limited/defined) like the benefiting attached to the one who performs Hajj which is realised as a result of his performance of it whilst it is also possible for it to not be realised.