In order to take into account the various differences which existed among the Arabian dialects, Allaah revealed the Qur’aan in seven different forms. The forms matched the dialects of the following seven tribes: Quraysh, Huthayl, Thaqeef, Hawaazin, Kinaanah, Tameem, and Yemen. 21 These various forms did not represent different Qur’aans, as Jibreel only conveyed verses from a single Qur’aan written on a protected tablet (al-Lawh al-Mahfooth) in the heavens.

However, Jibreel was instructed to recite the verses that he brought in seven forms corresponding to the dialects of the major tribes. The various forms represented the various ways in which the same word might be said according to the various dialects. However, the meanings were all stated the same. The Prophet (ﷺ) informed most of his companions (sahaabah) of the existence of various readings so that the variation in their readings would not create any discord or division among them. The sahaabee Ibn ‘Abbaas reported that he heard Allaah’s Messenger (ﷺ) say

However, not all of the companions were aware of the various readings at the same time. Consequently, some minor disagreements did take place, which were resolved by the Prophet (ﷺ) himself. An example of such cases can be found in the following incident narrated by one of the Prophet’s closet companions. ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab said, “Once during the lifetime of Allaah’s Messenger (ﷺ), I heard Hishaam ibn Hakeem reciting Soorah al-Furqaan in salaah, and I noticed that he recited it differently from the way in which the Prophet (ﷺ) had taught me.

I was on the verge of jumping on him during his salaah, but I managed to control my anger until he completed his prayer. Upon its completion, I grabbed him by the neck of his cloak and said, ‘Who taught you this soorah that I heard you reciting?’ He replied, ‘Allaah’s Messenger (ﷺ) taught it to me!’ I said, ‘You are a liar, for Allaah’s Messenger (ﷺ) has taught it to me in a different way from the way you recited it!’ I then dragged him to Allaah’s Messenger (ﷺ) and said to him, ‘I heard this person reciting Soorah al-Furqaan in a different way from the way that you taught me.’ Allaah’s Messenger (ﷺ) then said, ‘Release him ‘Umar! Recite Hishaam!’ Hishaam recited in the same way that I heard him reciting previously. Then the Messenger of Allaah (ﷺ) said, ‘It was revealed in this way!’ He then said, ‘Recite ‘Umar!’ When I completed reciting it the way he had taught me, he said,

Ibn ‘Abdul Barr argued on the basis of this incident that the interpretation of the seven forms as meaning seven tribal dialects is flawed, since ‘Umar and Hishaam were both from the Qurayshee tribe. He interpreted it as meaning seven facets of harmonious meaning conveyed by varying words; for example, words like halumma, t‘aala, and aqbil, which all mean ‘come.’ Ibn Hajr, after quoting him, offered the opinion that the two interpretations are not mutually contradictory. It may be that the variation consists of differing words for the same meanings and that the variations are from the dialects of seven Arabic tribes.

Ibn Qutaybah proposed a different interpretation of the seven forms:

1. variations in vowel markings, while the letters and meaning are unchanged; for example laa yudaarra and laa yudaarru in verse 282 of Soorah al-Baqarah:

2. variations in the form of a verb; for example: ba‘‘ada and baa‘id in verse 19 of Soorah Saba’:

The variation in this example is in two aspects: between the past tense and the imperative and between the second form and the third form of the root, i.e. fa‘‘ala and faa‘ala.

3. variations in dots of letters that have the same basic shape; for example, raa’ and zaa’ in the words nunshiruhaa and nunshizuhaa, two variant wordings of verse 259 of Soorah al-Baqarah:

The variant wording, nunshiruhaa, means ‘We restore them to life.’

4. variations due to substitution of one letter for another that is pronounced from a nearby location in the mouth or throat; for example 'ayn and haa’ both originate from the middle of the throat. In verse 29 of Soorah al-Waaqi‘ah, the word, talhin (banana trees or a kind of acacia tree) is also recited tal‘in (spadix of a palm tree).

5. variations due to the transposition of words in a phrase; for example, in verse 19 of Soorah Qaaf,

a variant recitation attributed to Aboo Bakr is:

6. variations due to the addition or subtraction of letters or words; for example, in verses 1-3 of Soorah al-Layl:

The recitation of Ibn Mas‘ood and Aboo ad-Dardaa’ omitted the first three words of verse 3, wa maa khalaqa, (and [by] Him Who created). Some recitations added words to what is recorded in the Mus-haf ‘Uthmaan. Al-Bukhaaree collected the statement of Ibn ‘Abbaas, “When the verse was revealed,

the Messenger of Allaah (r) went out, climbed atop the hill of as-Safaa and shouted...” 24 The verse referred to by Ibn ‘Abbaas is verse 214 of Soorah ashShu‘araa’. However, only the first half of it, “Warn your clan of nearest relations,” appears in the Mus-haf ‘Uthmaan. Some scholars say this is really an example of naskh (abrogated recitation).25

7. variations due to the use of one synonym in place of another. This is what Ibn ‘Abdul Barr was referring to. An example of this is Ibn Mas‘ood’s recitation of .كَالصُّوفِ recited he ,كَالْعِھْنِ الْمَنْفُوشِ of Instead .ah‘Qaari-al Soorah of 5 verse ِوشُفْنَمْالBoth phrases mean ‘like carded wool.’ 26

Other scholars, such as Ibn al-Jazaree and Abul-Fadl ar-Raazee, proposed their own variations on the same principle. Ar-Raazee wrote, “The variations of language do not go outside seven aspects:

1. variations of nouns between singular, dual and plural and between masculine and feminine;

2. variations in verb tenses between perfect (past), imperfect (present and future)

and imperative (command);

3. variations in i‘raab (vowel endings that indicate the role of the word in the sentence);

4. addition and deletion of letters;

5. flipped word order;

6. substitution of one word for another;

7. variations in pronunciation such al-imaalah, al-fat-h, at-tarqeeq, at-tafkheem, al-idghaam and al-ith-haar.27

Ibn Hajr pointed out that there is considerable overlap between all these various explanations.28

23 Collected by al-Bukhaaree (Sahih Al-Bukhari, vol. 6, p. 482, no. 514) and Muslim (Sahih Muslim, vol. 2, pp. 389-90, no. 1782). Similar hadeeths are reported on the authority of Ubay ibn Ka‘b, ‘Abdur-Rahmaan ibn ‘Awf and Aboo Hurayrah. In fact, Ibn al-Jazaree collected the reports on this issue and found that nineteen of the sahaabah reported it. It is thus considered a mutawaatir hadeeth in its meaning.