Qanday mol-mulkdan u vojib bo'ladi? Bir guruh faqihlar uni bug'doy, xurmo, arpa yoki aqit (nordon sutdan tayyorlangan pishloq) bilan berish vojib, bu esa vojib bo'lgan shaxsning ixtiyoridadir, deb hisobladilar. Boshqa bir guruh faqihlar esa uni yurtning asosiy oziq-ovqatidan, yoki agar unda asosiy oziq-ovqat bo'lmasa, mukallafning oziq-ovqatidan berish vojib, deb hisobladilar. Bu fikrni 'Abd al-Vahhob Maliki mazhabining qarashi sifatida rivoyat qilgan.

From what kind of wealth is it due? A group of jurists held that it is due either in wheat, or dates, or barley, or in aqit (cheese made from sour milk), and that this is a choice of the person on whom it is obligatory. Another group of jurists held that it is obligatory upon him in the staple food of the land, or in the food of the mukallafif he does not possess the dominant staple food. This is what <Abd al-Wahhab has related as the opinion of the School’ (Malik’s).

Ularning ixtilofining sababi Abu Sa'id al-Xudriy rivoyat qilgan hadisni tushunishdagi farqdan kelib chiqadi. U aytadi: "Payg'ambar (Allohning salavoti va barakasi unga bo'lsin) davrida biz fitr sadaqasini bir sa' ovqat, yoki bir sa' arpa, yoki bir sa' aqit, yoki bir sa' quritilgan xurmo hisobida berar edik". Bu hadisdan tanlov ma'nosini chiqarganlar, bu narsalarning istalgan biridan berilsa ham kifoya qiladi, deyishdi. Hadisdan, to'lovdagi xilma-xillik ruxsat berishning asosi emas, balki to'lovchi kishining ovqatini yoki o'lkaning asosiy oziq-ovqatini hisobga olishdir, deb tushunganlar esa ikkinchi qarashni ma'qulladilar.

The reason for their disagreement stems from their dispute over the meaning of the tradition of Abu Sa Td al-Khudri, who said, “We used to pay c zakat al-fitr during the period of the Messenger of Allah (God’s peace and blessings be upon him) as a sdt of food or a sdt of barley or a sdt of aqit or a sat of dried dates”. Those who understood a choice from this said that any of these things he pays in is sufficient. Those who understood from it that the variety in payment is not a basis of permissibility, but is the consideration of the food of the person paying or of the staple food of the land, upheld the second opinion.

Qancha miqdor vojib? Fuqaholar kelishib olganlarki, xurmo yoki arpa shaklida berilgan zakotul-fitr bir so‘dan kam bo‘lmasligi kerak, chunki bu Ibn ‘Umarning rivoyatida sobit bo‘lgan. Ular bug‘doy bilan berilganda kishi qancha miqdor berishi mumkinligi haqida ixtilof qilishgan. Molik va ash-Shofi‘iy bir sodan kam bo‘lsa yetarli bo‘lmasligini aytishgan, Abu Hanifa va uning shogirdlari esa yarim so‘ yetarli bo‘lishini aytishgan.

How much is obligatory? The jurists agreed that the zakat al-fitr paid in the form of dried dates or barley is not to be less than one sa\ because that has been established in the tradition of Ibn ‘Umar. They disagreed about the quantity the person may pay in wheat. Malik and al-ShafiT said that less than one sat would not be sufficient, while Abu HanTfa and his disciples said that one-half sat is sufficient.

Ularning ixtilofining sababi rivoyatlarning ziddiyatidan kelib chiqadi. Abu Said al-Xudriy rivoyat qilgan hadisda u shunday degan: “Rasulullah (sollallohu alayhi vasallam) davrida biz fitr sadaqasini bir sos ovqat, yoki bir so‘ arpa, yoki bir so‘ aqit, yoki bir so‘ quritilgan xurmo, yoki bir so‘ kishmish bilan berardik”. Zohiriy ma’no shundaki, u “ovqat” deganda bug‘doyni nazarda tutgan. Zuhriy ham Abu Said orqali otasidan rivoyat qilgan: Rasulullah (sollallohu alayhi vasallam) shunday degan: “Fitr sadaqasi ikki kishi o‘rtasida bo‘lingan bir so‘ bug‘doy, yoki bir so‘ arpa, yoki har bir kishi uchun bir xurmodir”. Buni Abu Dovud rivoyat qilgan. Ibn al-Musayyabdan rivoyat qilinishicha, u shunday degan: “Rasulullah (sollallohu alayhi vasallam) davrida fitr sadaqasi yarim so‘ bug‘doy, yoki bir so‘ arpa, yoki bir so‘ quritilgan xurmo edi”. Bu rivoyatlarni qabul qilganlar, vojib bo‘lgan miqdor yarim so‘ bug‘doy deganlar. Abu Said rivoyatining zohiriy ma’nosini qabul qilganlar esa bug‘doyni arpaga qiyos qilib, ikkalasini vojiblik jihatidan teng deb hisoblaganlar.

The reason for their disagreement stems from the conflict of traditions. It is related in the tradition of Abu SacTd al-Khudri, who said, “We used to pay zakat al-fitr during the period of the Messenger of Allah (God’s peace and blessings be upon him) as a sat of food or a sat of barley or a sdt of aqit or a sdt of dried dates or a sdt of raisins”. The apparent meaning is that by food he meant wheat. Al-ZuhrT has also related from Abu SacTd from his father that the Messenger of Allah (God’s peace and blessings be upon him) said, “For the sadaqa of fitr is one sat of wheat shared by two persons or a s«c of barley or one of dates for each person”. It is recorded by Abu Dawud. It is related from Ibn al-Musayyab that he said, “The sadaqa of fitr in the period of the Messenger of Allah (God’s peace and blessings be upon him) was one-half s& of wheat or one sdc of barley or one sd< of dried dates”. Those who adopted these traditions said that the obligation is for one-half sa< of wheat, while those who adopted the apparent meaning of the tradition of Abu SacTd made an analogy for wheat upon barley and held them to be similar for the obligation.