据《布哈里圣训实录》（2/803/2172）记载，阿绥姆说：

In Sahih ul-Bukhari (2/803/2172), it was related from ‘Asim that he said:

我对安斯说,愿安拉喜悦他:“你是否听说过先知说:‘伊斯兰教中没有希勒夫(盟约)’?”他回答说:“确实,先知在我的家里在古莱什人和安萨尔之间缔结了一个希勒夫(盟约/协定)。”ﷺ

“I said to Anas, may Allah be pleased with him: “Has it reached you that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “There is no Hilf (alliance) is Islam”?” He replied: “Verily, the Prophet (peace be upon him) made a Hilf (alliance/pact) between the Quraish and the Ansar in my house”.

这段圣训也被以下学者记载：布哈里在其《圣训实录》（6/2673/6909）、《文学专论》（1/200/569）中；穆斯林的《圣训实录》（4/1960-1961/2529）中；伊本·希班的《圣训实录》（10/379/4520）中；艾布·达乌德的《逊南》（3/129/2926）中；伊玛目艾哈迈德·本·罕百勒的《穆斯奈德》（3/111/12110）、（3/145/12494）、（3/281/14018）、（3/281/14018）、3/281/14019中；候迈迪的《穆斯奈德》（2/507/120）中；伊玛目阿慕尔·本·阿西姆·沙拜尼的《单传与多传》（3/382/1792）中；拜海奇的《大逊南》（6/262/12301）中；以及伊玛目艾布·叶阑在其《穆斯奈德》（7/90/4023）、（7/90/4024）和（7/91/4028）中。

This Hadith was also recorded by Al-Bukhari in his Sahih (6/2673/6909), in his Adab ul-Mufrad (1/200/569), Sahih Muslim (4/1960-1961/2529), Sahih Ibn Hibban (10/379/4520), Sunan Abu Dawud (3/129/2926), Musnad of Ahmad bin Hanbal (3/111/12110), (3/145/12494), (3/281/14018), (3/281/14018), 3/281/14019, Musnad of Al-Hamidiy (2/507/120), Al-Aahad Wa l-Mathaniy of Imam ‘Amr bin ‘Asim Ash-Shaibaniy (3/382/1792), Al-Baihaqi’s Sunan Al-Kubra (6/262/12301) and by Imam Abu Ya’la in his Musnad (7/90/4023), (7/90/4024) and (7/91/4028).

安纳斯·本·马立克,愿安拉喜悦他,是唯一使用“Haalafa”一词的人,即订立盟约。而其他所有人都使用“Aakhaa”一词,即结为兄弟。看来,他之所以用“Haalafa”而非“Aakhaa”,是为了表明他对人们转述先知ﷺ所说的话缺乏确信,即先知ﷺ曾说:“伊斯兰中没有Hilf(结盟)。”因为他察觉到这种“Mu’akhaah”(结为兄弟)之中包含了蒙昧时期人们用来订立盟约的一切内容。他在这一点上是正确的,因为先知ﷺ在门徒之间所推行的这种“Mu’akhaah”,比蒙昧时期的订约更加全面、更加深入。然而,他以使用这一措辞作为回应,并借此质疑“伊斯兰中没有Hilf”这句话出自先知ﷺ,则是不对的。因为这道废止性的经文是在麦加光荣开启之后才降下的,其完整措辞是:“伊斯兰中没有Hilf(结盟);蒙昧时期所订立的任何盟约,伊斯兰只会增强它的力量。”这段圣训经由大量持续的传述(Tawatur)传到我们这里。这段圣训必然意味着:“从今日起,在伊斯兰中不要再订立新的Hilf;蒙昧时期所订立的任何盟约仍然有效并被执行,伊斯兰只会增强它的力量。”此外,通过更有力的推理:在伊斯兰之中、于这项禁令之前所订立的盟约(Tahaluf),仍然有效,除非先知ﷺ本人废止了它。

Anas bin Malik, may Allah be pleased with him, was alone in using the wording “Haalafa” i.e. to make a treaty/pact. Whilst, all others used the word “Aakhaa” i.e. to make brothers. It appears, that he used this wording “Haalafa”, instead of “Aakhaa”, to reinforce his lack of conviction concerning what the people were conveying from the Prophet (peace be upon him), in respect to him having said: “There is no Hilf (alliance making) in Islam”. That is as he observed that this “Mu’akhaah” (making of brothers) comprised, within it, all that the people use to make treaties upon in the pre-Islamic (Jaahiliyah) period when they made alliances or pacts. He was correct in respect to that, because this “Mu’akhaah” which the Prophet (peace be upon him) implemented, between his companions, was more comprehensive and deeper than the pact making of the pre-Islamic era. However, he was not correct to rely upon the utilization of that wording in response, in order to place doubt in the statement of “There is no Hilf in Islam” being attributable to the Prophet (peace be upon him). That is because this Nasikh (abrogator) came late following the glorious opening of Makkah and its complete wording was: “There is no Hilf (alliance) in Islam and any alliance made in the pre- Islamic period of ignorance (Jahiliyah), then Islam only increases it in strength”. And this Hadith has reached us by way of Tawatur (concurrent transmissions). This Hadith means by necessity: “Do not make a new Hilf in Islam after this day and any alliance that was made in the pre-Islamic period of Jahiliyah (ignorance) remains standing and in implementation. Islam only increases it in strength. In addition, by greater reasoning: Alliances or pacts (Tahaluf) which were made in islam, prior to this forbiddance, remain in place, apart from what the Prophet himself (peace be upon him) nullified.