1.8 Mageuzi ya Umoja wa Mataifa Yanayohalalisha Ugaidi Dhidi ya Waislamu
1.8 Un Reforms To Legitimize Terror Against Muslims
“Mfumo wa Umoja wa Mataifa una kasoro hata katika msingi wake, na hata katika nia zake, kwa wale wanaoweza kuona nyuma ya pazia na tamko la uongo la upendo na amani kutoka kwa matajiri, wenye nguvu, wadanganyifu wanaoeneza hofu ambao wanataka tu kuwa daima na udhibiti juu ya wengine.” -- Ron McEntee. Kuhangaikia kwa baadhi ya nchi za Kiislamu juu ya nchi zipi zinapaswa kuwa na kiti katika Baraza la Usalama la Umoja wa Mataifa lililopanuliwa ni kuelekezwa vibaya. Badala yake, lengo linapaswa kuwa katika marekebisho yaliyopendekezwa na yale yanayomaanisha kwa ulimwengu wa Kiislamu.
“The United Nations system is flawed even in its foundation, and even in its motives, to those who can see through the veil and false declarations of love and peace from wealthy, powerful, conniving fear mongers who only want to always be in control over others.” -- Ron McEntee he obsession of some Muslim countries on which countries should occupy a seat in the expanded UN Security Council is misdirected. Instead the focus should be on the proposed reforms and what it means for the Muslim world.
Mbali na mpango wa kupanua Baraza la Usalama, marekebisho mapya yanapendekeza matumizi ya mashambulizi ya kuzuia (pre-emptive strikes) na yanajumuisha ufafanuzi usio na mipaka maalum kuhusu ugaidi. Mapendekezo haya yanakusudiwa kujadiliwa na Baraza Kuu baadaye mwaka huu, lakini hadi sasa mijadala imejikita katika upanuzi wa Baraza la Usalama.
Besides the plan to expand the Security Council, the new reforms advocate the use of pre-emptive strikes and include an open-ended definition on terrorism. The proposals are meant to be debated by the General Assembly later this year, but so far the discussions have revolved around the expansion of the Security Council.
Kuingizwa kwa mashambulizi ya kuzuia (pre-emptive strikes) na ufafanuzi usio makini wa ugaidi kutawawezesha mataifa ya Magharibi kuhalalisha kisheria hatua za adhabu dhidi ya nchi za Kiislamu ambazo zinaonekana kuwa tishio kwa maslahi yao. Tishio halihitaji kuwa la kweli, linahitaji tu kudhaniwa kuwa lipo. Hili litaendeleza utawala wa Magharibi juu ya ardhi za Waislamu ndani ya mipaka ya sheria za kimataifa.
The inclusion of pre-emptive strikes and a loose definition on terrorism will enable western powers to legally justify punitive actions against Muslim countries that pose a threat to their interests. The threat does not have to be real, only perceived. This will preserve the West’ s domination over Muslims lands within the ambit of international law.
Tangu kuanzishwa kwake mwaka 1945, Umoja wa Mataifa umekuwa ukitumiwa na mataifa makubwa, hasa Marekani, kuimarisha ukuu wao duniani kote. Hakuna watu walioteseka zaidi mikononi mwa Umoja wa Mataifa kuliko Umma wa Kiislamu. Magharibi ilitumia Umoja wa Mataifa kugawanya ardhi za Waislamu, kama vile kutenganishwa kwa Bangladesh na Pakistan, kugawanywa kwa Bosnia na kugawanywa kwa Indonesia.
Since its inception in 1945, the UN has been used by the great powers especially America to cement their hegemony all over the world. No people have suffered more at the hands of the UN then the Muslim Ummah. The West used the UN to carve up Muslim land such as the separation of Bangladesh from Pakistan, dismemberment of Bosnia and the division of Indonesia.
Zaidi ya hayo, Umoja wa Mataifa umetumiwa na nchi za Magharibi kuchoma kisu kirefu moyoni mwa Ummah kwa kuiunda Israeli na kuunga mkono kuwepo kwake kwa kutoa maazimio yanayoipendelea.
Furthermore, the UN has been used by the West to plunge a dagger deep into the heart of the Ummah by creating Israel and supporting its existence by issuing resolutions in her favour.
Umoja wa Mataifa pia umecheza jukumu muhimu katika kuwatenganisha Waislamu wao kwa wao kwa kuweka vikwazo dhidi ya Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Iran na Afghanistan. Umoja wa Mataifa pia umetumiwa na nchi za Magharibi kuhalalisha uvamizi wa Somalia, pamoja na kuikalia kwa mabavu Iraq na Afghanistan.
The UN has also played the instrumental role in isolating Muslims from each other by imposing sanctions on Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Iran and Afghanistan. The UN has also been used by the West to justify the invasion of Somalia, and the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.
Ikizingatiwa rekodi ya uhalifu ya Umoja wa Mataifa dhidi ya ulimwengu wa Kiislamu, mipango yake ya uadui kwa siku zijazo, na kushindwa kwake kuzuia ubabe wa Marekani, ni jambo lisiloaminika kwa nini watawala wa ulimwengu wa Kiislamu wanajisalimisha bila kufikiri kwa Umoja wa Mataifa na kuuheshimu kwa kiwango kikubwa.
Given the UN’ s criminal record against the Muslim world, its hostile plans for the future and its inability to restrain American hegemony, it beggars belief why the rulers of the Muslim world blindly submit to the UN and hold it in such great esteem.
Mtawala yeyote mwenye akili timamu na busara kidogo angekuwa ameshatambua kufikia sasa kwamba kuvunja uhusiano na Umoja wa Mataifa kungewapa nafasi bora zaidi ya kupambana na ubeberu wa Magharibi.
Any sane ruler with a modicum of common sense should have realized by now that severing ties with the UN would give them a better chance of fighting western imperialism.
Au watakutana na hatima ile ile aliyokumbana nayo Saddam Hussein, ambaye alifuata maazimio ya Umoja wa Mataifa kwa ukamilifu na hivyo kusababisha uharibifu wa Iraq.
Or else they will meet the same fate as Saddam Hussein who followed UN resolutions to the letter and caused the destruction of Iraq.
Leo, kuna kejeli chungu kwamba wakati watawala wa ulimwengu wa Kiislamu wanaapa utii wao kwa Umoja wa Mataifa, Marekani inatambua mapungufu ya Umoja wa Mataifa katika kupambana na Uislamu na bado inataka kufuata msimamo wa upande mmoja ili kuzima mwamko wa Kiislamu duniani.
Today, the bitter irony is that while the rulers of the Muslim world pledge their loyalty to the UN, America realizes UN’ s limitations to fight Islam and still wants to pursue a unilateralist course to subdue the global Islamic revival.
Chanzo pekee cha ulinzi dhidi ya uchokozi wa madola ya Magharibi na vyombo vyao vya ugaidi kama Umoja wa Mataifa kiko katika kuibuka kwa Dola ya Kiislamu yenye nguvu. Kwa kweli, ni mwenendo wa Khilafa ya Ottoman kuelekea Ulaya ulioyachochea mataifa ya Ulaya kuhitimisha Mkataba wa Westphalia, na sheria ya kimataifa ikazaliwa.
The only source of protection from the aggression of Western powers and their instruments of terrorism such as the UN lie in the emergence of a powerful Islamic State. In actual fact it was the Ottoman Caliphate’ s march towards Europe that encouraged European nations to conclude the Treaty of Westphalia and international law was born.
Dola ya Ukhalifa wa Ottoman ilisimama imara dhidi ya sheria za kimataifa kwa uthabiti mkubwa hivi kwamba kwa miaka mingi iliweza kuzitaka nchi zilizokuwa vitani kutia saini mikataba ya amani kwa masharti yake yenyewe, bila kusalimisha rasilimali za Ummah wala kuhatarisha maadili ya Kiislamu.
The Ottoman Caliphate stood firm against international law with such resoluteness that for many years it was able to demand warring countries to sign up to peace treaties on its terms and without surrendering the Ummah’ s resources or compromising Islamic values.
Julai 15, 2005
July 15, 2005