贸易中最重要的一点是，市场参与者对市场、其规则与法规以及规则执行的一致性怀有信心。政府若通过关税、税收、直接干预（例如 ESF）或变更法规进行干预，参与者便会感到沮丧，并失去对体系的信心。伊斯兰教法在这方面的规定是明确的。先知ﷺ说：

The most important aspect of trade is that participants feel confident in the market, its rules, regulations and consistency of application of the rules. Where governments intervene whether via tariffs, taxation, direct intervention (eg ESF) or change of regulation, participants are frustrated and lose confidence in the system. The Shariah rules in this regard are explicit. The Prophet (Peace be upon him) said:

这一规定确立了商业领域的一项基本原则：市场、价格和买卖应当听任其依据内在的经济规律和自然竞争而作出反应，不受人为操纵。

This establishes a basic principle in the field of commerce: that the market, its prices, and sales, should be left free to respond to internal economic forces and natural competition without manipulation.

安斯传述:"在安拉的使者ﷺ时代,物价飞涨,人们便对他说:'安拉的使者啊,您为什么不规定价格(价格管制)呢?'他说:'安拉是定价者、限制者、供给者,也是给予者。我希望与安拉相见时,没有任何人因血液或财产而控告我对其有过不义。'"因此,在伊斯兰国家中,操纵市场或国家干预市场的做法是绝对被禁止的。

Anas reported: “Prices soared during the time of the Messenger of Allah (Peace be upon him) so they said to him; ‘O Messenger of Allah why don’t you introduce pricing (price controls)?’ He said; “Verily Allah is the Recipient, the Extender of wealth, the Provider, and the Pricer, and I hope that I will meet Allah (swt) without having anyone accusing me of having perpetrated an oppression against him be it in blood or in money.” So the notion of market manipulation or State interference in markets is absolutely prohibited in the Islamic state..

艾哈迈德和阿布·乌贝德转述乌克巴·本·阿米尔的传述：先知ﷺ

Ahmed and Abu Ubayd reported on authority of Uqbah ibn Amir that the Prophet (Peace be upon him)

Your message contained only "said:" with no text beyond it, so there is nothing substantive to translate. If you send the English passage you'd like translated into Simplified Chinese, I'll translate it.

said:

除非是对伊斯兰国家施加的贸易报复性关税，否则以限制贸易的方式征收此类税收是违背沙里亚的。类似的保护主义措施，例如对某些产业进行补贴、征收关税以及对知识产权的限制，都会对自由贸易构成障碍，在伊斯兰的经济生活中没有立足之地。动用公共资金救助某些商业集团（银行）同样是对公平经济行为的背离，实际上构成一种新形式的税收，最终由普通民众买单：他们或以纳税的方式、或因公共开支削减、或因通货膨胀导致财富缩水而承担救助的代价。

Barring the imposition of customs for reciprocity when applied against the Islamic state, it is against the Shariah to apply such taxes which restrict trade. Similar protectionist measures against trading partners as subsidising some industries, tariffs and intellectual property right restrictions all act as barriers to free trade and have no part in Islamic economic life. Use of public money to bail out some business groupings (banks) is also an anathema to fair economic practice and is effectively a new form of tax on the masses who will pay for the bailouts via tax, cut backs in public spending or a decline in the value of their wealth via inflation.