1.3 Haɗa su tare a matsayin ’yan’uwa (Al-Mu’akhaah) tsakanin Muhajirin da Ansar
1.3 The joining together as brothers “Al-Mu’akhaah) between the Muhajirin and the Ansar
A cikin Sahih ul-Bukhari (2/803/2172), an ruwaito daga ‘Asim cewa ya ce:
In Sahih ul-Bukhari (2/803/2172), it was related from ‘Asim that he said:

Na ce wa Anas, Allah ya yarda da shi: "Shin ya isa gare ka cewa Annabi ﷺ ya ce: 'Babu Hilf (alkawari/yarjejeniya) a Musulunci'?" Sai ya amsa: "Lalle Annabi ﷺ ya yi Hilf (alkawari/yarjejeniya) tsakanin Quraishawa da Ansar a gidana."
“I said to Anas, may Allah be pleased with him: “Has it reached you that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “There is no Hilf (alliance) is Islam”?” He replied: “Verily, the Prophet (peace be upon him) made a Hilf (alliance/pact) between the Quraish and the Ansar in my house”.
Wannan Hadisi kuma Al-Bukhari ya rubuta shi a cikin Sahihinsa (6/2673/6909), a cikin Adab ul-Mufrad dinsa (1/200/569), Sahih Muslim (4/1960-1961/2529), Sahih Ibn Hibban (10/379/4520), Sunan Abu Dawud (3/129/2926), Musnad na Ahmad bin Hanbal (3/111/12110), (3/145/12494), (3/281/14018), (3/281/14018), 3/281/14019, Musnad na Al-Hamidiy (2/507/120), Al-Aahad Wa l-Mathaniy na Imam ‘Amr bin ‘Asim Ash-Shaibaniy (3/382/1792), Sunan Al-Kubra na Al-Baihaqi (6/262/12301), da kuma Imam Abu Ya’la a cikin Musnadinsa (7/90/4023), (7/90/4024) da (7/91/4028).
This Hadith was also recorded by Al-Bukhari in his Sahih (6/2673/6909), in his Adab ul-Mufrad (1/200/569), Sahih Muslim (4/1960-1961/2529), Sahih Ibn Hibban (10/379/4520), Sunan Abu Dawud (3/129/2926), Musnad of Ahmad bin Hanbal (3/111/12110), (3/145/12494), (3/281/14018), (3/281/14018), 3/281/14019, Musnad of Al-Hamidiy (2/507/120), Al-Aahad Wa l-Mathaniy of Imam ‘Amr bin ‘Asim Ash-Shaibaniy (3/382/1792), Al-Baihaqi’s Sunan Al-Kubra (6/262/12301) and by Imam Abu Ya’la in his Musnad (7/90/4023), (7/90/4024) and (7/91/4028).
Anas bin Malik, Allah ya yarda da shi, shi kaɗai ne ya yi amfani da kalmar "Haalafa", wato ya yi yarjejeniya/alkawari, alhali kowa ya yi amfani da kalmar "Aakhaa", wato ya yi ’yan’uwantaka. Ga alama, ya yi amfani da kalmar "Haalafa" maimakon "Aakhaa" ne don nuna rashin tabbacinsa game da abin da mutane ke isarwa daga Annabi ﷺ, dangane da maganarsa: "Babu Hilf (kulla alkawari) a Musulunci." Wato ya lura cewa wannan "Mu'akhaah" (yin ’yan’uwantaka) ya ƙunshi duk abin da mutane ke amfani da shi wajen kulla yarjejeniya a zamanin Jahiliyya, lokacin da suke yin ƙawance ko alkawari. Ya yi daidai game da hakan, domin wannan "Mu'akhaah" da Annabi ﷺ ya aiwatar tsakanin sahabbansa ya fi faɗi da zurfi fiye da kulla yarjejeniya ta zamanin Jahiliyya. Sai dai bai yi daidai ba da ya dogara da amfani da wannan kalma a matsayin martani, don ya jefa shakka kan magana "Babu Hilf a Musulunci" cewa daga Annabi ﷺ ta fito. Hakan ya faru ne saboda wannan Nasikh (abin soke hukunci) ya zo daga baya bayan buɗe Makkah cikin ɗaukaka, kuma cikakkiyar kalmarsa ita ce: "Babu Hilf (ƙawance) a Musulunci, kuma duk wani ƙawance da aka yi a zamanin Jahiliyya, to Musulunci kawai yana ƙara masa ƙarfi." Wannan Hadisi kuma ya isa gare mu ta hanyar Tawatur (ruwaya mai yawa daga mutane da yawa). Wannan Hadisi yana nufin babu makawa: "Kada ku kulla sabon Hilf a Musulunci bayan wannan rana, kuma duk wani ƙawance da aka yi a zamanin Jahiliyya na Jahiliyya yana nan yana aiki. Musulunci kawai yana ƙara masa ƙarfi." Bugu da ƙari, ta hanyar hujja mafi ƙarfi: Yarjejeniyoyi (Tahaluf) da aka kulla a Musulunci kafin wannan haramci suna nan daram, sai dai abin da Annabi ﷺ da kansa ya soke.
Anas bin Malik, may Allah be pleased with him, was alone in using the wording “Haalafa” i.e. to make a treaty/pact. Whilst, all others used the word “Aakhaa” i.e. to make brothers. It appears, that he used this wording “Haalafa”, instead of “Aakhaa”, to reinforce his lack of conviction concerning what the people were conveying from the Prophet (peace be upon him), in respect to him having said: “There is no Hilf (alliance making) in Islam”. That is as he observed that this “Mu’akhaah” (making of brothers) comprised, within it, all that the people use to make treaties upon in the pre-Islamic (Jaahiliyah) period when they made alliances or pacts. He was correct in respect to that, because this “Mu’akhaah” which the Prophet (peace be upon him) implemented, between his companions, was more comprehensive and deeper than the pact making of the pre-Islamic era. However, he was not correct to rely upon the utilization of that wording in response, in order to place doubt in the statement of “There is no Hilf in Islam” being attributable to the Prophet (peace be upon him). That is because this Nasikh (abrogator) came late following the glorious opening of Makkah and its complete wording was: “There is no Hilf (alliance) in Islam and any alliance made in the pre- Islamic period of ignorance (Jahiliyah), then Islam only increases it in strength”. And this Hadith has reached us by way of Tawatur (concurrent transmissions). This Hadith means by necessity: “Do not make a new Hilf in Islam after this day and any alliance that was made in the pre-Islamic period of Jahiliyah (ignorance) remains standing and in implementation. Islam only increases it in strength. In addition, by greater reasoning: Alliances or pacts (Tahaluf) which were made in islam, prior to this forbiddance, remain in place, apart from what the Prophet himself (peace be upon him) nullified.