1993 yilda Yugoslaviyaga qarshi NATO hujumi G'arb tomonidan Yugoslaviyaning har qanday oqilona tinchlik rejasiga rozi bo'lishni rad etgani, xususan Kosovoda tinchlik rejasini amalga oshirish uchun xalqaro xavfsizlik kuchlarini joylashtirish rejalarini rad etgani natijasi sifatida ko'rsatildi. G'arbning aralashuvi va keyinchalik NATO tomonidan amalga oshirilgan bombardimon kampaniyasi doimo "terrorizmga qarshi urush" Islomga qarshi urush emasligining va G'arb "insonparvarlik" maqsadlarida dunyoning istalgan joyiga aralashishga tayyorligining dalili sifatida keltiriladi, go'yo 1993 yilda musulmonlarga yordam berilgandek. Prezident Bill Klintonning sobiq yordamchisi va Davlat departamenti matbuot kotibi Jeyms Rubin 2003 yilda aynan shunday qarashni ilgari surgan.

The NATO attack on Yugoslavia in 1993, was presented by the West as the consequence of Yugoslavia’s stubborn refusal to settle for any reasonable peace plan - in particular its rejection of plans for an international security force to implement a peace plan in Kosovo. Intervention by the West and then the eventual bombing campaign by NATO is continually held as evidence that the current ‘war on terror’ is not a war on Islam and that the West will intervene across the world for ‘humanitarian’ purposes, even helping Muslims as they apparently did in 1993. James Rubin former assistant to President Bill Clinton and state department spokesman advocated such a view in 2003.

U shunday dedi: «Iroqqa bostirib kirish orqali Amerika yillar davomida inson huquqlarini targ'ib qilish, Kosovoda va kechikib bo'lsa-da Bosniyada musulmonlarni qirg'indan qutqarish orqali to'plagan axloqiy obro'sini behuda sarflab yubordi.

He said: ‘By invading Iraq, America has squandered the moral authority built up over years of promoting human rights, saving Muslims from slaughter in Kosovo, and belatedly in Bosnia.

Aslida esa, geosiyosiy maqsadlar ancha boshqacha edi. 1990-yillarda Balkanlardagi siyosiy beqarorlik Amerikaning mintaqadagi Rossiya ta'sirini kamaytirish, Yevropaning unga bog'liqligini oshirish hamda Sovuq urushdan keyin tobora ortiqcha bo'lib ko'rinayotgan NATO'ga yangi qonuniylik berish borasidagi intilishi tufayli yanada kuchaydi.

In reality however the geopolitical aims were very different. The political instability in the Balkans during the 1990’s was exacerbated by American determination to reduce Russia’s influence in the region, increase Europe’s dependency upon her and confer new legitimacy to NATO when it appeared increasingly redundant after the Cold War.

Gʻarb davlatlari, xususan AQSh va Buyuk Britaniya, Yugoslaviyaning parchalanishi uchun ishlagan. Bu haqda 1992 yil yanvar oyida, harbiy harakatlar boshlanishidan oldin, AQSHning Yugoslaviyadagi elchisi Uorren Zimmerman oshkor qilgan: «Biz Yugoslaviyaning mustaqil davlatlarga boʻlinishiga intilyapmiz».8 1992 yil 18 martda Yevropa Ittifoqi Lissabonda bosniyalik musulmonlar, xorvatlar va serblar oʻrtasida bitim tuzdi. Bu bitimga koʻra, Serb respublikasi etnik asosda uchta kantonga boʻlinishi va konfederatsiya sifatida mustaqil davlat vazifasini bajarishi nazarda tutilgan edi. Ammo bu kelishuvni AQSh buzdi: u Bosniya prezidenti Alija Izetbegovichni bitimdan voz kechib, davlat mustaqilligini eʻlon qilishga undadi, buni «1 martdagi referendum bilan asoslash mumkin», deb aytdi. Gʻarbiy Yevropa Ittifoqi bosh kotibi Xose Kutilero ham tasdiqladi: «Adolatli boʻlish uchun aytish kerakki, Gʻarb vositachilari prezident Alija Izetbegovich va uning yordamchilarini bitimni buzishga va yagona Bosniya davlati uchun kurashishga ragbatlantirishgan». Aynan shu narsa Bosniya fuqarolar urushiga sabab boʻldi.

The Western powers and specifically both the US and Britain worked for the fragmentation of Yugoslavia as was revealed by the then US Ambassador to Yugoslavia Warren Zimmerman in January 1992 before the outbreak of hostilities: ‘we are aiming for a dissolution of Yugoslavia into independent states.’8 On the 18th March 1992 the EU brokered a deal in Lisbon among Bosnian Muslims, Croats and Serb communities partitioning the Serb republic into three ethnically based cantons which would act as a confederation functioning as an independent state. This agreement was sabotaged by the US which urged the Bosnian President Alija Izetbegovic to renege the deal by declaring statehood saying ‘this was justified by the referendum on March 1st.’. Jose Cutileiro, secretary general of the Western European union confirmed ‘to be fair President Alija Izethbegovic and his aids were encouraged to scupper the deal and to fight for a unitary Bosnian state by Western mediators.’ This is what caused the Bosnian civil war.

Bugun Bosniya, Kosovo va Makedoniyada tinchlik uchun joylashtirilgan deb taxmin qilinayotgan 11 000 nafar askar bor; biroq bunday qo'shinlar AQSh iqtisodiy manfaatlarini ta'minlab kelmoqda. Sobiq AQSh konggressmeni Li Xemilton "New York Times" gazetasiga shunday izoh bergan: "Biz Balkanlar ustidan to'liq nazoratni qo'lga kiritdik. AQSh rasmiylari sobiq Yugoslaviyaning barcha davlatlari ustidan boshqaruv funksiyalarini amalga oshirmoqda. Biz amalda pro konsulmiz." Geosiyosat bo'yicha mutaxassis Karen Tolbot esa shuni tasdiqlagan: "AQSh va NATOning har qanday narxda Kosovoni va deyarli butun Yugoslaviyani egallash qarori mo'l-ko'l tabiiy resurslarga ega bo'lish istagi bilan rag'batlantirilmoqda. Faqat Kosovoda Rossiyadan g'arbda butun Yevropadagi eng boy mineral resurslar mavjud." "New York Times" esa shunday qayd etgan: "Keng ko'lamli davlat mulki bo'lgan Trepcha kon majmuasi Balkanlardagi eng qimmatli ko'chmas mulk bo'lib, kamida 5 milliard dollar qiymatga ega, yiliga o'nlab million dollar foyda keltirib, oltin, kumush, sof qo'rg'oshin, rux, kadmiy ishlab chiqarmoqda. Kosovoda, shuningdek, 17 milliard tonna ko'mir zaxiralari mavjud, va Kosovoda (Serbiya va Albaniya kabi) neft zaxiralari ham bor."

Today 11,000 troops are stationed in Bosnia, Kosovo and Macedonia allegedly for peace; however such troops have ensured US economic interests are secured. Former US congressman Lee Hamilton commented in the New York Times: ‘we have completely taken over the control of the Balkans. US officials exercise managing functions over all states of the former Yugoslavia. We are virtually the pro consul.’ Karen Talbot geopolitical expert confirmed ‘the determination by the U.S and NATO, at all costs, to occupy Kosovo and virtually all of Yugoslavia, is spurred on by the enticement of abundant natural resources. Kosovo alone has the richest mineral resources in all of Europe west of Russia.’ The New York Times observed that ‘the sprawling state-owned Trepca mining complex, the most valuable piece of real estate in the Balkans, is worth at least $5 billion, producing gold, silver, pure lead, zinc, cadmium, as well as tens of millions of dollars in profits annually. Kosovo also possesses 17 billion tons of coal reserves and Kosovo (like Serbia and Albania) also has oil reserves.

Prezident Bill Klinton o'sha paytda bexosdan shunday degan: «Agar biz kuchli iqtisodiy aloqalarga ega bo'lishni istasak, bu jumlaga dunyo bo'ylab sotish imkoniyatimiz ham kiradi, Yevropa esa asosiy hamkor bo'lishi kerak… Kosovo masalasi aynan shu haqda edi.

President Bill Clinton at the time let slip ‘If we are going to have a strong economic relationship that includes our ability to sell around the world, Europe has got to be a key…That‘s what the Kosovo thing was all about.

Bombardimon tugaganidan so'ng, Balqon mintaqasida ko'plab AQSh bazalari tashkil etildi. Kosovoda harbiy baza qurilmoqda, uni Vyetnam urushidan keyin qurilgan AQShning eng yirik xorijiy bazasi deb ta'riflashmoqda. AQShning NATO ustidan hukmronligi shuni anglatardiki, NATO kuchlarining Balqonga aralashuvi mintaqada AQSh ta'sirini ta'minlaydi. Pentagonning 1994–1999 yillardagi Mudofaa rejalashtirish ko'rsatmasining oshkor bo'lgan nusxasida shunday deyilgan: Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlari "NATOni zaiflashtiradigan, faqat Yevropa xavfsizlik tuzilmalarining paydo bo'lishiga yo'l qo'ymasligi kerak... Shu sababli G'arbning asosiy mudofaa va xavfsizlik vositasi, shuningdek, AQShning Yevropa xavfsizlik masalalariga ta'siri va ishtirok etish kanali sifatida NATOni saqlab qolish juda muhimdir.

Since the bombing has ended, numerous US bases in the Balkans have been set up. A military base is being built in Kosovo, described as the largest US foreign base built since the Vietnam War. US domination of NATO meant intervention by NATO forces in the Balkans would ensure US influence in the region. A leaked version of the Pentagon’s 1994-1999 Defense Planning Guidance report advises that the United States ‘must seek to prevent the emergence of European-only security arrangements which would undermine NATO...Therefore, it is of fundamental importance to preserve NATO as the primary instrument of Western defense and security, as well as the channel for US influence and participation in European security affairs.

Bu barchasi Rossiyaning ta'siri, Kaspiy dengizidagi neft va AQShning ta'sirini davom ettirish uchun NATOning qayta jonlantirilishi AQSH va G'arb aralashuvining geosiyosiy maqsadlari bo'lganini tasdiqlaydi.

This all confirms that the influence of Russia, the oil in the Caspian Sea and the revitalisation of NATO (to continue US influence) were the geopolitical aims behind US and Western intervention.

Minglab-minglab begunoh odamlarning hayoti va Srebrenitsada qatl etilganlarning hayoti AQShning hukmronligini davom ettirish uchun to‘lashga arziydigan narx edi.

The lives of thousands of innocent people and the lives of those slaughtered in Srebrenica were a price worth paying by the US for continued US dominance.