Xulosa
Conclusion
Dunyoda istalgan vaqtda sodir bo‘layotgan turli voqealar kimning nima qilayotgani va bunday harakatlarning sabablarini chalkashtirib yuborishi mumkin. Ummat butun dunyoga Islom da’vatini yetkazish vazifasiga mas’ul bo‘lgani uchun, har bir musulmon uchun jahon vaziyatini kuzatib borish, uning sharoitlarini tushunish va dunyo xalqlarining niyatlari hamda ularning siyosiy rejalari bilan tanishib borish zarurdir. Jahon vaziyatini yoki jahon kuchlari muvozanatini tushunish uchun quyidagi jihatlarni nazarda tutish lozim:
The global situation at any given time can have multiple events taking place which can cloud who is doing what and the motives behind such actions. Since the Ummah is entrusted with carrying the Islamic da’wah to the whole world, it is indispensable for every Muslim to pursue the global situation, comprehend its circumstances, and acquaint oneself with the motives of the world’s nations and their political plans. In order to understand the global situation or the global balance of power the following points should be kept in mind:
1. Biror siyosiy vaziyatning asosliligini, u keltirishi mumkin bo'lgan strategik ustunlikni yoki aniq bir haqiqatning afsona ekanligini baholash uchun, faqat xalqaro vaziyatni va bir-biri bilan raqobatlashuvchi xalqlarni yaxshi bilgandagina buni haqiqatan tushunish mumkin. Geosiyosiy haqiqatlarning o'zi ularning asosliligini ko'rsatmaydi; global kuch muvozanatini tashkil etuvchi xalqlarni milliy siyosatlar bilan birga bog'lab o'rganish har qanday global kurashni tushunish va afsonalarni haqiqatdan ajratish yo'lidir.
1. In order to asses the validity of any political situation or the strategic advantage a particular policy may bring, or even whether a certain fact in reality is a myth - this can only really be understood if one is acquainted with the international situation and the nations that compete with each other. Geopolitical realities on their own give no indication of their validity, linking wider factors such as the nations that make up the global balance of power alongside national policies is the way to comprehend any global struggle and distinguish myths from truths.
2. Geosiyosat siyosatning bir tarmog'idir. Avval siyosatni tushunmasdan turib, global geosiyosiy vaziyatni kuzatish mumkin emas va bu xavflidir. Geosiyosatni aniq tushunish siyosat orqali amalga oshadi. Chunki siyosat — bu mafkurani amalga oshirish orqali davlatning ichki ishlarini boshqarishga qaratilgan siyosatlar, rejalar va uslublardir, tashqi siyosat esa davlatning o'z maqsadlariga erishish uchun dunyo bilan o'rnatadigan munosabatlaridir. Geosiyosiy maydonni aynan siyosat belgilaydi; shuning uchun dunyo bo'ylab kamayib borayotgan suv quduqlari, neft siyosati, Suvaysh kanali yoki Fors ko'rfazini nazorat qilish o'z-o'zidan muhim masalalar emas, balki dunyo davlatlarining turli-tuman manfaatlari ularni strategik jihatdan ahamiyatli qilib qo'yadi.
2. Geopolitics is a branch of politics. It is impossible and dangerous to follow the global geopolitical situation without first understanding politics. It is through politics that geopolitics is clearly understood. This is because politics is the polices, plans and styles used to take care of the nations affairs domestically through the implementation of an ideology whist a nations foreign policy is the relations a nation builds with the world in order to achieve its goals. It is the politics that will define the geopolitical arena, hence the dwindling water wells around the world, the politics of oil, control of the Suez canal or the Persian Gulf are not issues in themselves, but the multiple interests a variety of nations around the world have makes them strategically important.
3. Nations around the world are either ideological in nature, where they have adopted an ideology which gives the nation direction and acts as a basis for deriving legislation and building policies, such as the US, Britain, France and Germany with Capitalism. Then there are other nations which do not embrace an ideology but have interests which are defined by their history or location; for them, the protection of these interests is what drives policy development, as can be seen with Pakistan attempting to defend itself against India and Tibet wanting independence from China. The application of the ideology and the attempts to protect and achieve national interests lead to interactions across the world, and this is the international situation.
3. Nations around the world are either ideological in nature where they have adopted an ideology which gives the nation direction and acts as a basis for deriving legislation and building polices, such as the US, Britain, France and Germany with Capitalism. Then there are other nations which do not embrace an ideology but have interests which are defined by their history or location, for them the protection of the interest is what drives policy development as can be seen with Pakistan attempting to defend itself against India and Tibet wanting independence from China. The application of the ideology and the attempts to protect and achieve national interests leads to interactions across the world and this is the international situation.
4. Dunyodagi istalgan millatning ahvoli doimo bir xil bo‘lib qolmaydi. U kuch va zaiflik, ta’sir o‘tkazish qudrati yoki uning yo‘qligi, shuningdek boshqa millatlar bilan tashqi munosabatlaridagi farq va o‘zgarishlar jihatidan ko‘plab o‘zgarishlarni boshdan kechiradi. Shu sababli xalqaro vaziyatni ko‘rib chiqish uchun doimiy bir chegara yoki qat’iy qoidalar majmuasini belgilash mumkin emas, chunki xalqaro vaziyat doimo o‘zgaruvchan holatda bo‘ladi. Biroq, istalgan vaqtda xalqaro vaziyatni tahlil qilish mumkin, chunki u o‘zgarishga moyildir. Shuningdek, dunyodagi kuchlarning qudratini tahlil qilish ham mumkin, bunday baholash ham o‘zgarishga moyil ekanini hisobga olgan holda. 5. Xalqaro vaziyat – dunyo millatlari o‘rtasidagi xalqaro munosabatlarning tuzilishidir. U super davlatning va unga raqobatlashadigan millatlarning holatidir.
4. The state of affairs in any nation of the world does not remain the same. It goes through many changes, in terms of strength and weakness, power of influence or its absence, and in terms of difference and change in its foreign relations with other nations. This is why it is impossible to draw a constant framework or a set of guidelines to view the international situation as the international situation is always in a state of flux. However, an analysis of the international situation at any given time is possible bearing in mind it is liable for change. It is also possible to analyze the strength of the powers in the world bearing in mind such an assessment is liable for change. 5. The international situation is the structure of the international relations between the world’s nations. It is the status of the superpower and the nations that compete with it.
Dunyo kuchlari muvozanatini tushunish, dunyo kuchlari bo‘lgan davlatlarni, ularning siyosatini va maqsadlarini bilishdan tashqari, xalqaro munosabatlar bilimini talab qiladi. Xalqaro munosabatlar esa dunyo kuchlari o‘rtasida super davlat mavqeini egallash uchun doimiy raqobatdir. Shu sababli xalqaro vaziyat barqaror emas va ko‘plab o‘zgarishlarni boshidan kechiradi. Shuning uchun dunyo kuchlari muvozanatini har qanday tahlil ma’lum bir vaqt nuqtasining tavsifidir. Xalqaro vaziyat o‘zgarganda, bunday tahlil tarixning bir qismiga aylanadi.
Understanding the global balance of power apart from knowing the nations who are the world’s powers, their policies and aims requires the knowledge of international relations, which is the constant competition between the world’s powers over the position of the superpower. This is why the international situation is not stable and goes through many changes. Hence any analysis of the global balance of power is a description of a particular point in time. When the international situation changes such an analysis becomes part of history.
6. Xalqaro vaziyat doim o‘zgaruvchan holatda bo‘ladi, chunki u ba’zi davlatlarning siyosiy-iqtisodiy ahvoli bilan belgilanadi va bu ahvol bir holatdan boshqasiga o‘zgarib turadi. Bunday vaziyat va sharoitlarning o‘zgarishi yo bir millatning kuchayishi yoki zaiflashishi, yo uning boshqa davlatlar bilan munosabatlarining mustahkamlanishi yoki zaiflashishi tufayli yuz beradi. Bunday hollarda dunyodagi kuchlar muvozanatining o‘zgarishi natijasida global kuchlar muvozanati ham o‘zgaradi. Shu sababli xalqaro vaziyatga ta’sir ko‘rsatadigan har bir davlatning holatini tushunish global kuchlar muvozanatini anglashning asosidir.
6. The international situation will always be in a state of flux because it is determined by the political-economic situation of some states from one circumstance to another. Such change of situations and circumstances is either because a nation became stronger or weaker, or because its relations with other states became stronger or weaker. In such a case, a change in the global balance of power would result due to a change in the balance of powers existent in the world. This is why understanding the status of each state that has influence on the international situation is the basis for understanding the global balance of power.
7. Dunyodagi biror vaqtdagi vaziyatni tushunish uchun dunyo siyosatining barcha jihatlarini bilish shart emas. Global muvozanatni tashkil etmaydigan davlatlarni kuzatib borish zarur emas, chunki dunyodagi asosiy voqealar dunyo kuchlarining bir-biri bilan turli sohalarda va dunyoning turli hududlarida raqobatlashishi natijasida yuz beradi.
7. Understanding the global situation at any given time does not mean one must be acquainted with all of the world’s politics. The nations who do not make up the global balance of power need not be pursued as the major actions in the world are a result of the world’s powers competing with each other and in different arenas across the world.
- Shimoliy Koreyaning AQSh bilan yadroviy qurollar bo‘yicha to‘qnashuvi AQShning Xitoyni cheklashga qaratilgan urinishlarining bevosita natijasidir. Xitoy Shimoliy va Janubiy Koreyaning qayta birlashishi uchun ko‘p tomonlama muzokaralarni izlab kelmoqda, chunki o‘z orqa hududi xavf ostida qolishini istamaydi. Bunday uchrashuvlar yakunlari ziddiyatli bo‘lib kelgan: Xitoy muzokaralardan umidsizlanib, ko‘pchilik masalalarda o‘zini chetga olgan holda bildirmoqda, AQSh esa muzokaralarning muvaffaqiyatli o‘tayotganini takror-takror ta’kidlab kelmoqda.
- The North Korea Nuclear weapons stand-off with the US is a direct result of US attempts to contain China. China has been pursuing multilateral talks for the reunification of North and South Korea trying to ensure its back door is not set on fire. The statements from such meetings have been contradictory where China has been pessimistic about the talks with distance on most issues whilst the US has continually remarked successful negotiations.
AQSh Shimoliy Koreya bilan to'g'ridan-to'g'ri muzokara olib bormagan, bu esa vaziyatni yanada keskinlashtirmoqda. Muzokaralarning sekin borishi va cho'zilishi mintaqadagi qariyb 100 000 nafar AQSh harbiy xizmatchisining turishi uchun juda mos keladi, Shimoliy Koreyaning 2006 yil oktyabr oyida yadro qurolini sinab ko'rishi esa Xitoyning sa'y-harakatlarini susaytiradi va AQShning Janubiy Koreyada uzoq muddatli va sezilarli darajada katta harbiy mavjudligi uchun munosib asos yaratadi. J. Rielly o'zining siyosat hujjatida buni quyidagicha bayon qilgan: "Bu AQSh qo'shinlari mintaqada shunchaki mahalliy beqarorlikka sabab bo'layotgan "terrorchi guruhlar" bilan kurashish uchun emas, balki Janubiy Xitoy dengizidagi hududlar ustidan AQSh harbiy nazoratini kuchaytirish uchun joylashgan. Ulkan neft zaxiralariga ega bo'lgan bu strategik hudud Yaqin Sharqqa boradigan dengiz yo'llari yonida joylashgan bo'lib, Janubiy-Sharqiy Osiyoning katta qismiga chiqish imkonini beradi. Kengaytirilgan AQSh..."
The US has not directly negotiated with North Korea which is exasperating the issue. The continued sluggish progress and prolonging fits perfectly for the presence of nearly 100,000 US troops in the region and with North Korea testing its nuclear arsenal in October 2006 this will expend Chinese efforts and gives a suitable justification for sustained and substantial US presence in South Korea. J Rielly outlined this in a policy paper: ‘These U.S. troops are in the region not simply to fight the "terrorist groups" causing local instability, but to enhance U.S. military control over territory in the South China Sea. This strategic area with vast potential oil reserves sits aside the shipping lanes to the Middle East and offers access to much of Southeast Asia. The expanded U.S.
Osiyo davlatlari o‘rtasidagi mustaqil kelishuvlarni to‘sadi, shu jumladan ASEAN Mintaqaviy forumi kabi mexanizmlar orqali, va Xitoyning xavotirlarini kuchaytiradi.41
presence and nascent military alliances with Southeast Asian nations exacerbates Chinese anxieties and impedes independent accords among Asian states though such mechanisms as the ASEAN Regional Forum.’41
Janubiy Ossetiyaning Gruziyadan mustaqillik talab qilishi AQSh va Rossiya o'rtasida Sharqiy Yevropa ustidan nazorat uchun kurashning bevosita natijasidir. Balkan urushlari, mohiyatan, Sovet Ittifoqidan keyingi dunyoda Rossiyani cheklash va sobiq kommunistik davlatlarni AQSh ta'sir doirasiga kiritish maqsadida AQSh tomonidan yaratilgan. Rossiya o'z tarixi tufayli Serbiyani o'z ta'sir doirasiga kiritishga muvaffaq bo'ldi va uni AQSh hukmronligiga to'sqinlik qilish uchun tayanch sifatida ishlatdi.
- The call for independence by South Ossetia from Georgia is a direct result of competition between the US and Russia for control over Eastern Europe. The Balkan wars were essentially created by the US to contain Russia in a post Soviet world and bring the former communist states under the US area of influence. Russia was able to bring Serbia under its area of influence due to its history and has used it as a bulwark to frustrate US dominance.
Serbiya Amerika rejalari yo'lida to'siq bo'lib kelgan, shu sababli AQSh uni avvaliga Chernogoriyani Serbiyadan ajratib olish, so'ngra Kosovoni undan ajratish orqali, keyin esa NATOning Kosovodagi hamda Serbiyaning o'zidagi Serbiya harbiy kuchlariga hujumi orqali zaiflashtirishga intilgan. Shimoliy Osetiya Rossiya tarkibidagi yarim avtonom hudud, Janubiy Osetiya esa SSSR so'nggi kunlarida Gruziya tarkibiga o'tib qolgan. Rossiya Shimoliy Osetiya bilan bo'lgan aloqalaridan foydalanib, Janubiy Osetiyaliklarni mustaqillik uchun chaqirishga undagan va shu yo'l bilan mintaqadagi AQSh maqsadlariga to'siq qo'ygan. Rossiya Tskhinvali rahbariyati bilan yaqin aloqada bo'lib, u yerdagi separatistlar Moskvaning qo'llab-quvvatlovchi pozitsiyasini olqishlaydi. Gruziyaning katta norozілigiga ko'ra, Janubiy Osetiyaliklarning aksariyati Rossiya pasportiga ega, savdoda esa Rossiya rubli keng qo'llaniladi.
Serbia has been a barrier for the American agenda and as a result the US was keen to weaken it initially by engineering the separation of Montenegro from Serbia, then separating Kosovo from it and then the NATO attack on Serbian armed forces in Kosovo as well as in Serbia itself. North Ossetia is a semi autonomous region in Russia, whilst South Ossetia fell into Georgia in the dying days of the USSR. Russia has used its relations with North Ossetia to push South Ossetians to call for independence thus thwarting US aims in the region. Russia maintains close contacts with the leadership in Tskhinvali where separatists welcome Moscow’s supportive stance. To Georgia’s deep annoyance, most South Ossetians have Russian passports and the Russian rouble is commonly used in trade.
Tibetning Xitoydan ajralish uchun qilayotgan chaqirig'i ham Xitoy va AQSh o'rtasidagi kurashdir.
- The call by Tibet for separation from China is also a struggle between China and the US.
AQSH ning mintaqadagi aralashuvi 1950-yillarda, Xitoyning kommunizmni qabul qilishiga qarshi turish maqsadida, MDH (CIA) orqali boshlangan. 1959-yildagi falokatli qonli qo'zg'olon, Erkin Tibet harakati tomonidan, Tibetda Xitoy kommunistlariga qarshi MDH tomonidan keng miqyosda o'tkazilgan yashirin harbiy harakatlar kampaniyasi edi. O'nlab ming tibetliklar halok bo'ldi, Dalay-lama va taxminan 100 000 nafar izdoshi esa xavfli Himolay dovonlari orqali Hindiston va Nepalga qochishga majbur bo'ldi. MDH Dalay-lamaning qarshilik jangchilari uchun AQShdagi Kolorado shtatining Lidvill yaqinidagi Kemp Xeyl qal'asida yashirin harbiy o'quv lagerini tashkil etdi. Tibet partizanlari MDH tomonidan partizan urushi va xitoy kommunistlariga qarshi diversion operatsiyalarga tayyorlandi hamda ta'minlandi. Xitoy bir qator jiddiy muammolar qarshisida turibdi: Shinjon viloyatidagi uyg'ur musulmonlari, Falun Gong harakati va mustaqillikka intilayotgan boshqa ko'plab noroziliklar. Tibetliklar esa o'zlarini zulmkor Pekin va Xitoyni zaiflashtirishga intilayotgan ayyor Vashington o'rtasida qolgandek his qilmoqda.
US interference in the region begun in the 1950’s through the CIA in order to counter China’s adoption of communism. The disastrous bloody uprising in 1959 by the Free Tibet Movement was a CIA conducted large scale covert action campaign against the communist Chinese in Tibet. Tens of thousands of Tibetans were left dead, while the Dalai Lama and about 100,000 followers were forced to flee across the treacherous Himalayan passes to India and Nepal. The CIA established a secret military training camp for the Dalai Lama’s resistance fighters at Camp Hale near Leadville, Colorado, in the US. The Tibetan guerrillas were trained and equipped by the CIA for guerrilla warfare and sabotage operations against the communist Chinese. China is faced with significant problems, with the Uighur Muslims in Xinjiang province, and the activities of the Falun Gong among many other dissident groups aiming for independence. Tibetan people find themselves trapped between an oppressive Beijing and a manipulative Washington attempting to weaken China.
8. Raqobat dunyo kuchlari o'rtasida vaqt boshidan mavjud bo'lgan va qiyomat kunigacha davom etadi. Qadimda fir'avnlar davridagi Misr super kuch edi, Mesopotamiya esa unga raqobat qilardi. Rim imperiyasi super kuchga aylandi, Fors imperiyasi esa unga raqobat qildi. Keyinchalik Xilofat Fors va Vizantiya imperiyalarining qoldiqlarini mag'lub etdi va XVIII asrgacha dunyoning super kuchi bo'lib qoldi; bu davrda u mo'g'ullar va salib yurishchilari tomonidan qiyinchiliklarga duch keldi. So'ngra Frantsiya va Angliya XVIII asrning o'rtalarigacha deyarli uch asr davomida Usmonli Xilofati bilan raqobatlashdi. Birinchi jahon urushi arafasida Germaniya dunyo kuchlari muvozanatini o'zgartirdi, Frantsiya va Britaniya esa unga qarshi raqobatlashdi. Birinchi jahon urushidan keyin Britaniya dunyo kuchi sifatida yuzaga chiqdi, Frantsiya esa unga raqobat qildi. Germaniya yana bir bor Britaniyaga dunyo super kuchi sifatida da'vo qildi va faqat Ikkinchi jahon urushi nemis gegemoniyasiga chek qo'ydi. Ikkinchi jahon urushidan keyin AQSh dunyoning super kuchi sifatida yuzaga chiqdi va besh o'n yillik davomida Sovet Ittifoqi tomonidan raqobatga duch keldi, to uning 1990-yilda parchalanishigacha.
8. Competition between the world powers is something that has existed from the beginning of time and will continue until the day of judgement. In ancient times Egypt under the pharaohs was the superpower and Mesopotamia competed with it. The Roman Empire became the superpower and the Persian Empire competed with it. The Khilafah then defeated the remnants of the Persian and Byzantine empires and was the world’s superpower until the 18th century facing challenges from the Mongols and the crusaders during this time. France and England then competed with the Uthmani Khilafah for nearly three centuries until the mid-18th century. On the eve of World War 1 Germany shifted the global balance of power, whilst France and Britain competed with it. After World War 1 Britain emerged as the world’s power and France competed with it. Germany once again challenged Britain as the world’s superpower and only World War 2 stopped German hegemony. The US emerged the world’s superpower after World War 2 and was challenged by the Soviet Union for five decades until its collapse in 1990.
9. 2008 yilda AQSh dunyoning yagona super davlati hisoblanadi. Garchi zaiflashib borayotgan bo‘lsa-da, u hanuzgacha xalqaro siyosatda dunyo bo‘ylab eng katta ta’sirga ega. AQSh dunyoning eng katta iqtisodiyotiga ega, bu borada boshqalardan ancha ustun, texnologik jihatdan esa eng rivojlangan davlatdir. U o‘z manfaatlarini himoya qilish maqsadida dunyo bo‘ylab harbiy bazalarni saqlab turadi. AQShga raqobat qila oladigan davlatlar Rossiya, Britaniya, Fransiya va Germaniyadir.
9. In 2008 the US is the world’s superpower. Although faltering it still has the greatest influence around the world on international politics. The US is the world’s largest economy by far and the most advanced nation technologically, and maintains military bases across the world in order to protect its interests. The nations that are able to compete with the US are Russia, Britain, France and Germany.
Barcha to'rt davlatning dunyo miqyosida xalqaro ambitsiyalari bor. So'nggi o'n yil ichida Rossiya o'zining mineral resurslari va kommunal xizmatlarini nazorat ostiga olishga muvaffaq bo'ldi hamda Sovet Ittifoqi parchalanishidan foyda ko'rgan ko'plab oligarxlarni chetlatdi. Dunyodagi eng yirik energetika zaxiralaridan biriga ega bo'lgan mamlakat hozir zamonaviy harbiy kuchini rivojlantirmoqda va deyarli o'n yil davomida AQShning raqobatsiz gegemonligi bo'lgan mintaqalarda unga to'g'ridan-to'g'ri raqobatlashmoqda.
All four nations have international ambitions across the world. Russia in the last decade has managed to gain control over its mineral resources and utilities and banished many oligarchs who benefited from the break-up of the Soviet Union. With some of the worlds largest energy reserves it is now developing a state of the art military and competing directly with the US in regions where the US for nearly a decade had uncontested hegemony.
Britaniya tarixan jahon davlati bo‘lgan va hozir ham o‘zining sobiq mustamlakalarida ta’sirga ega.
Britain historically has been a world power and still has influence in its former colonies.
Britaniya Yevropada asosiy o‘yinchi bo‘lib, AQSh rejalarining ko‘pini puchga chiqargan. Britaniya global ambitsiyalarini saqlab qolishda davom etadi va o‘z manfaatlarini himoya qilish uchun AQSh bilan hamkorlik qiladi, ko‘p hollarda esa u bilan raqobatlashadi.
Britain is a key player in Europe and has frustrated many US plans. Britain continues to have global ambitions and works to maintain its interests by cooperating with the US and on many occasions competing with it.
Frantsiya, Britaniya kabi, Yevropa tarixi va siyosatida asosiy ishtirokchi bo‘lib kelgan. Uning o‘nlab yillar davomidagi siyosati mustamlakalari, frantsuz madaniyati va iqtisodiy kuchi orqali butun dunyoda ta’sir o‘tkazishga qaratilgan edi.
France like Britain has been a key player in European history and politics, its policies for decades have been centred on creating influence across the world through its colonies, French culture and through its economic strength.
Germaniya dunyoda iqtisodiyoti bo‘yicha uchinchi o‘rinda turadi — yalpi ichki mahsuloti 2,7 trillion dollar — va Yevropadagi kuchli iqtisodiy davlatdir. U dunyodagi tovarlarning eng yirik eksportchisi bo‘lib, eksport hajmi 1,1 trillion dollarni tashkil etadi. Germaniya bugun o‘ziga xos iqtisodiy siyosat yordamida iqtisodiy jihatdan kengayib bormoqda va Sharqiy Yevropa mintaqalarida amalda ustunlikka ega. Germaniya, shuningdek, Isroil bilan Hizbulloh o‘rtasida asirlar almashinuvi masalasini muvaffaqiyatli hal etishda faol vositachilik rolini o‘ynadi.
Germany is the third largest in economy in the world at $2.7 trillion and an economic powerhouse in Europe. It is the world’s largest exporter of goods at $1.1 trillion. Germany today is expanding economically through a distinct set of economic policies with a virtual hegemony in the regions of Eastern Europe. Germany also played an active role in the successful mediation in the issue of exchanging prisoners between Israel and Hezbollah.
Germaniya ham 2006-yilda Isroilning Livanga bostirib kirishi paytida dengiz kuchlarini joylashtirgan. Uning tarkibiga ikkita fregat — "Mecklenburg-Vorpommern" va "Karlsruhe" kirgan bo‘lib, ularni vertolyotlar, ta’minot kemalari hamda patrul qayiqlari qo‘llab-quvvatlagan. Kemalarda taxminan 1500 kishi xizmat qilgan.
Germany also deployed a naval force in the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 2006. Its deployment consisted of two frigates - the Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and Karlsruhe - supported by helicopters, supply ships and patrol boats, with about 1,500 men on board.
Bu Germaniyaning Ikkinchi jahon urushidan keyingi eng yirik harbiy yurishi.
This is Germany’s largest military deployment since World War 2.
AQShga bevosita raqobat qiladigan millatlardan keyin, dunyo bo‘ylab Xitoy eng katta ta’sirga ega, lekin hozircha u mintaqaviy kuch bo‘lib qolmoqda. Agar Xitoy xalqaro maqsadlarida tor doiradagi bo‘lmasdan, faqat o‘z mintaqasiga e’tibor qaratmaganida, u dunyo kuchlari bilan raqobatlashgan bo‘lar edi. Biroq, bu vaziyat kelajakda o‘zgarishi juda ehtimol.
After the nations that directly compete with the US across the world, China has the most influence however it remains currently a regional power. Had China not been narrow in its international ambitions, focusing only on its region it would have competed with the world’s powers. However, this situation is very likely to change in the future.
Yaponiya AQSh dan keyin dunyodagi eng katta iqtisodiyotga ega bo‘lgan iqtisodiy kuch hisoblanadi. Biroq iqtisodiy sohadan tashqarida u hech qanday ta’sirga ega emas. Uning hozirgi siyosati — Afg‘onistondagi koalitsiyada ishtirok etishi hamda tinchlikparvar konstitutsiyasining 9-moddasini bekor qilib, qo‘shin joylashtirish va yadro qurolini ishlab chiqish imkonini berishi — AQSh mintaqadagi Xitoy ta’siriga qarshi muvozanat yaratishga urinayotganining belgisidir. Yaponiyaning ta’siri aslida Yaponiya taraqqiyotidan ko‘ra AQSh hukmronligini isbotlaydi.
Japan is an economic power with the largest economy in the world after the US. However, outside the economic sphere it has no influence. Its current policy of taking part in the coalition in Afghanistan and the removal of article 9 in its pacifist constitution allowing it to deploy troops and develop nuclear weapons, is the US attempting to counterbalance Chinese influence in the region. Japanese influence actually proves US dominance, rather than Japanese development.
Buyuk davlatlardan tashqari, tarixiy yoki geografik sabablarga ko'ra ayrim masalalarda ma'lum sharoitlarda ta'sirga ega bo'lgan ba'zi millatlar ham bor, ammo bu ta'sir vaqtinchalik bo'lgan. Hindiston katta aholiga ega va yadro qurollariga egadir hamda kelajakda o'z mintaqasiga ta'sir o'tkazish salohiyatiga ega, Italiya esa Ikkinchi jahon urushigacha bir vaqtlar kuchli davlat bo'lgan, lekin bu ham vaqtinchalik edi. Hozirgi kunda global kuchlar muvozanati shunday bo'lib, u istalgan vaqtda o'zgarishi mumkin.
After the great powers there are some nations that have influence in some circumstances on specific issues due to their history or location, but this has been temporary. India has a large population and possesses nuclear weapons and has the potential in the future to influence its region, whilst Italy was once a power prior to World War 2 but this was temporary. Currently this is the global balance of power, which is liable to change at any time.
Ushbu davlatlarning tarixini, ularning qanday rivojlangani, e'tiqodlari va qadriyatlarini, shuningdek qabul qilgan mafkuralarini tushunish kishiga har bir davlatning maqsad-niyatlarini anglash imkonini beradi. Bu millatlarning barchasi dunyo miqyosida bir-biri bilan, shuningdek, super davlat - AQSh bilan raqobatlashadi. Xalqaro vaziyatni juda aniq tushunish mumkin, chunki jahon vaziyati dunyo kuchlarining o‘z manfaatlariga erishish uchun olib borayotgan raqobatidir.
Understanding the histories of these states, how they developed, their beliefs and values as well as the ideologies they have embraced would give one an understanding of the motives of these individual states. These nations all compete with each other globally as well as with the superpower - the US. This international situation can be understood very clearly as the global situation is the competition between the world’s powers to achieve their interests.
10. Musulmonlar shuni esda tutishlari kerakki, global miqyosda Ummat ahvoli qanchalik og'ir ko'rinmasin, bu manzaraning katta qismi sarobdir va uni juda osonlik bilan o'zgartirish va almashtirish mumkin. Musulmon Ummati tarixan buyuk kuch bo'lgan va XIX asrgacha xalqaro siyosatga ta'sir qilishda davom etgan. 1924-yilda Xilofatning barbod etilishi bilan uning xalqaro ta'siri pasaydi, chunki u davlatsiz qolgan edi va o'shandan beri u g'am-anduh va anarxiya holatida qolib kelmoqda. Biroq so'nggi o'n yillikda o'zgarish qaynoq nuqtasiga yetdi: endi Xilofat kelishining belgilari hatto musulmon bo'lmaganlar orasida ham asosiy g'oyaga aylanmoqda. G'arbning buzuq fikrlarini totib ko'rgan Ummat butun dunyo bo'ylab Kapitalizmni rad etdi, buni uning Islomga intilishi ko'rsatmoqda va Allohning izni bilan Xilofatning tongi otishga yaqin, xuddi Payg'ambar Muhammad ﷺ quyidagi hadisda bashorat qilganlaridek:
10. Muslims should bear in mind that however dire the situation may look globally for the Ummah, much of this picture is a mirage and can very easily be changed and replaced. The Muslim Ummah has historically been a superpower and continued to influence international politics until the nineteenth century. With the destruction of the Khilafah in 1924 its international influence declined as it was without a state and ever since it has remained in a situation of gloom and anarchy. However, in the last decade change has reached boiling point where now the signs of the coming of the Khilafah is a mainstream idea amongst even non-Muslims. After tasting the corrupt thoughts of the West, the Ummah globally rejected Capitalism as shown by her desire for Islam and by Allah’s leave the dawn of the Khilafah is about to rise as prophesised by the Prophet Muhammad وسلم وآله عليه الله صلى in the following hadith:
“Nubuvvat sizlar orasida Alloh xohlagancha davom etadi, so‘ngra Alloh uni olib qo‘yadi. Keyin nubuvvat yo‘llari bo‘yicha Xilofati Roshida (to‘g‘ri yo‘l tutgan xalifalik) bo‘ladi. U Alloh xohlagancha davom etadi, so‘ngra Alloh uni olib qo‘yadi. Shundan keyin irsiy hokimiyat bo‘ladi, u Alloh xohlagancha davom etadi, so‘ngra Alloh xohlasa, uni olib qo‘yadi. Shundan keyin qattiq zulm bo‘ladi, u Alloh xohlagancha davom etadi, so‘ngra Alloh xohlasa, uni olib qo‘yadi.”
“The Prophethood will last among you for as long as Allah wills, then Allah would take it away. Then it will be (followed by) a Khilafah Rashida (rightly guided) according to the ways of the Prophethood. It will remain for as long as Allah wills, then Allah would take it away. Afterwards there will be a hereditary leadership which will remain for as long as Allah wills, then He will lift it if He wishes. Afterwards, there will be biting oppression, and it will last for as long as Allah wishes, then He will lift it if He wishes.
So'ngra, Nubuvvat yo'li bo'yicha Xilofati roshida bo'ladi.” Keyin u jim qoldi. [Musnad Imam Ahmad (273)]
Then there will be a Khilafah Rashida according to the ways of the Prophethood.” Then he kept silent. [Musnad Imam Ahmad (273)]
1 Vudrou Vilson nutqi, Sent-Luis, 1919-yil 11-sentyabr
1 Woodrow Wilson speech at St. Louis 11 September, 1919
2 Rodrik D (1999) ‘Institutions for high quality growth; What are they and how to acquire them,’ Paper prepared for IMF conference on ‘second generation reform’ Washington DC, 8-9 November 1999
2 Rodrik D (1999) ‘Institutions for high quality growth; What are they and how to acquire them,’ Paper prepared for IMF conference on ‘second generation reform’ Washington DC, 8-9 November 1999
3 R. Alan Dahl, I. Shapiro, J. A. Cheibub, The Democracy Sourcebook, MIT Press 2003 va M. Hénaff, T. B. Strong, Public Space and Democracy, University of Minnesota Press 4 World Population Clock – Worldometers, 2008-yil sentyabr oyida olingan, http://www.worldometers.info/population/ 5 "The ins and outs: The EU's most effective foreign-policy instrument has been enlargement. But how far can it go?" The Economist, 2008-yil oktyabr, http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displaystory.cfm?subjectid=682266&story_id=8808134
3 R. Alan Dahl, I. Shapiro, J. A. Cheibub, The Democracy Sourcebook, MIT Press 2003 and M. Hénaff, T. B. Strong, Public Space and Democracy, University of Minnesota Press 4 World Population Clock – Worldometers, retrieved September 2008, http://www.worldometers.info/population/ 5 “The ins and outs: The EU's most effective foreign-policy instrument has been enlargement. But how far can it go?” The Economist, October 2008, http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displaystory.cfm?subjectid=682266&story_id=8808134
6 Koppelaar, Rembrandt H.E.M, „World Production and Peaking Outlook,” 2006–2009, 18-sentyabr 2008-yilda olindi, http://peakoil.nl/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/asponl_2005_report.pdf 7 James Rubin, Noyabr 2003, 2-oktyabr 2008-yilda olindi, http://www.newstatesman.com/200311170002
6 Koppelaar, Rembrandt H.E.M, ‘World Production and Peaking Outlook,’ 2006-2009, retrieved 18th September 2008, http://peakoil.nl/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/asponl_2005_report.pdf 7 James Rubin, November 2003, retrieved 2nd October 2008, http://www.newstatesman.com/200311170002
8 AQSh elchisi Uorren Zimmerman 1992 yil 12 yanvarda Xorvatiyaning "Danas" kundaligiga bergan intervyusi; http://www.emperors-clothes.com/interviews/nothing.htm manzilida qayta e'lon qilingan 9 Karen Talbot "Backing up Globalization with Military Might", New World Order Onslaught, Covert Action Quarterly, 68-son, 1999 yil kuzi, http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/Articles/Backing.asp 10 Benjamin Schwarz & Christopher Layne "The Case Against Intervention in Kosovo", the nation, 1999 yil 19 aprel, http://www.thenation.com/doc/19990419/schwarz/single 11 http://www.fair.org/press-releases/kosovo-solution.html 12 BMT Xavfsizlik Kengashining 912 (1994) sonli rezolyutsiyasi; u BMT Ruanda yordam missiyasi (UNAMIR) vakolati va kuch darajasining "moslashtirilishini" amalga oshiradi, bu moslashtirish 1994 yil 20 aprelda BMT Bosh kotibining Ruandadagi BMT yordam missiyasi haqidagi maxsus hisobotida ko'rsatilgan (S/1994/470 hujjat raqami), 2008 yil 2 iyulda olingan, http://daccessods.un.org/access.nsf/Get?Open&DS=S/1994/470&Lang=E&Area=UNDOC 13 Watson, Roland, "Bush deploys hawk as new UN envoy", The Times, 2005 yil mart, 2008 yil 1 iyulda olingan, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article421888.ece 14 Vincent B Khapoya, "The African Experience", Prentice Hall, 1998, 132-bet
Reference: Geopolitik afsonalar - Adnan Khan