Kuna tofauti halali kati ya Mujtahidina. Kujaribu kuondoa uwezekano wa kuwa na zaidi ya ufahamu mmoja kunapingana na asili ya Uislamu, na asili ya binadamu, ambayo Allah (SWT) aliwaumba nayo.

There exist legitimate differences amongst Mujtahideen. Trying to eliminate the possibilities of having more than one understanding goes against the nature of Islam, and the nature of human beings, which Allah (swt) created.

Wale wanaotoa wito wa kuwa na Madhehebu moja ya fiqhi kwa kweli wanaongeza Madhehebu mpya kwa zile zilizopo tayari. Hii ni kwa sababu mtu anaweza kutofautiana na Madhehebu hii mpya kwa sababu za kuaminika, na hatimaye akashikilia ufahamu wake. Inapaswa kueleweka kwamba mamlaka ni ya vyanzo vya sheria za Kiislamu, ambavyo vinatokana na Wahy (ufunuo). Kila mtu akiweka wazo hili akilini na akawa tayari kuacha maoni yake mwenyewe ili kukubali maoni yanayotegemea Daleel, matatizo yataondoka.

Those calling for this single Madhab are in fact adding a new Madhab to the already existing ones. This is due to the fact that a person might disagree with this new Madhab, for valid reasons, and would finally adhere to his understanding. It should be understood that sovereignty belongs to the Islamic legislative sources, which came from the Wahy (revelation). If everyone keeps this idea in mind and is ready to abandon his own opinion in order to adopt an opinion based on the Daleel, the problems would be eliminated.

Tukiangalia mifano mingi wakati wa zama za Maswahaba (ra), tunaweza kuona kwamba katika siku za Abu Bakr (ra), kulikuwa na tofauti za maoni miongoni mwa Maswahaba (ra). Hata hivyo, hakuna hata mmoja wao aliyeahirisha kazi ya kusimamisha Khilafah mpaka maoni yote yayeyuke na kuwa maoni moja pekee. Kwa hakika, walitambua kwamba kilichohitajika zaidi ya kila kitu kingine, hata zaidi ya kuzikwa kwa haraka kwa Mtume ﷺ, ni kumchagua Khalifa ambaye angeshughulikia mambo yao kwa kutekeleza Uislamu wote. Hivyo wakaanzisha mazingira ambamo jamii ingeweza kukabiliana na suala lolote linalokabili.

If we study the numerous examples during the era of the Sahabah (ra) we can find that in the days of Abu Bakr (ra), there were differences among the Sahabah (ra). However, none of them postponed working for the Khilafah until all opinions were melted into one single opinion. Actually they realised that, what was needed more than anything else, even more than the immediate burial of the Prophet (saw), was to elect a Khaleefah who would take care of their affairs by implementing all of Islam. Thus establishing an environment in which the society would be able to cope with any issue that it is faced with.

Vivyo hivyo, kinachohitajika sasa hivi ni mamlaka hiyo hiyo, inayoanzisha na kutekeleza Uislamu. Hata hivyo, mradi Ummah umeshughulishwa na miito kama vile kufanya kazi ya kuungana chini ya Madhehebu mapya moja, ambayo ni wito wa kudumisha na kuongeza muda wa utawala wa Taghoot (uovu), Ummah utaendelea kugawanyika, kupotoshwa, na matatizo yake yataendelea kuongezeka. Pasipo kuwa na utaratibu wa kutatua tatizo lake, Ummah utaendelea kudanganywa na wale wanaoutawala kwa kanuni za Kufr.

Similarly, what is needed presently is this same authority, which establishes and implements Islam. However, as long as the Ummah is preoccupied with calls such as working to unite under one new Madhab, which is a call to keep and prolong the rule of Taghoot (evil), the Ummah will continue to be disunited, misdirected, with its problems continuously multiplying. With no mechanism to solve its problem, the Ummah will continue to be manipulated by those who rule over it with the rules of Kufr.