这是世俗主义内在矛盾的一个绝佳例子。2016年有报道称：

This is a perfect example of the contradictions inherent to secularism. In 2016, it was reported:

两个有影响力的德国法律协会呼吁禁止法官和律师在法庭上佩戴头巾，以维护法庭的“中立”。

“Two influential German legal associations are calling for headscarves to be banned for judges and lawyers to uphold ‘neutrality’ in court.

“Robert Seegmüller”是德国行政法官协会主席，他表示，所要求的统一着装——黑袍、白衬衫，以及白色领结、领带或领巾——很重要，用以表明案件的结果“不取决于个人，而只取决于法律的规定”。2

“Robert Seegmüller, chairman of the Association of German Administrative Judges, said the required uniform of black robes, white shirt and white bow tie, cravat or neckerchief is important to show that the outcome of a case ‘does not depend on the person, but solely on what the law says.’”2

关于黑袍的起源，你认为是什么？据《纽约时报》的研究人员称："尽管司法长袍的起源仍不确定，但有人认为它起源于教会，那时神职人员与司法人员是同一群人。长袍在14世纪出现于英国司法界。"3

What do you think are the origins of the black robe? According to reserchers at the NY Times: “Although the judicial robe’s origin remains uncertain, some believe it has its origins in the church, when the clergy and judiciary were one and the same. Robes appeared in the British judiciary in the 14th century.”3