It is practically impossible to date the revelation of this surah, and this applies to its opening as well as to the surah as a whole. Nor is it possible to say for certain that its opening was revealed first and the rest after the lapse of some time. We cannot even say that this was more probable, because the opening and the ending of the surah tackle the same point, namely, the unbelievers’ rude claims about the Prophet, denouncing him as a madman.

There are many reports that suggest that this was the second surah to be revealed after Surah 96. Where different editions of the Qur’an mention an order of revelation, they all suggest that this is the second surah. Yet the style of the surah, the way it tackles its subject matter and its drift point to something else. In fact, these aspects almost confirm that it was revealed sometime after the call to Islam went public. It is well known that for three years the Prophet addressed his message to people privately, on an individual basis. In other words, this surah was most probably revealed during that time, when the Quraysh was determinedly opposed to the new message of Islam, resorting to all means to prevent it, including levelling defamatory allegations against the Prophet.

Byway of response, the Qur’an began to denounce such tactics, repelling unfounded allegations and issuing threats and warnings of the type this surah includes.

As we have said, it has been suggested that only the opening of the surah was revealed early on, soon after the first revelation of Surah 96.

It is further suggested that the negation of any madness attributed to the Prophet, which occurs in the opening, “you are not, by your Lord's grace, a madman? was in order to calm his own fears about whether such revelations were signs of madness. This is again unlikely, because the reports mentioning any such fears the Prophet may have had are exceedingly lacking in authenticity. Moreover, the way the surah is built as a single whole makes it clear that this negation is meant to refute the allegation mentioned at its conclusion: “ The unbelievers well-nigh trip you up with their eyes when they hear this reminder. They say, 'He is surely mad?' (Verse 51) It is this allegation that is negated at the surah's very outset. This is clearly understood when we read all the surah and appreciate how closely interlinked it is throughout.

Some reports also suggest that certain passages, specifically verses 17-23 and 42-52, were revealed in MadTnah. The first of these passages mentions the test endured by the owners of the garden, and the second refers to the Prophet Jonah. Again, we believe this not to be the case.

Instead, we suggest that the whole surah was revealed in Makkah, because its style is very much Makkan. Indeed, this is more likely, considering the style, the features and the overall unity of the surah.

Our own stance, therefore, is that the surah was not the second to be revealed, but rather that its revelation took place after the lapse of some considerable time after the start of the Prophets mission. It was certainly after the divine instruction was given to the Prophet to “warn your nearest kindred? (26: 214), and after the revelation of a substantial portion of the Qur’an speaking about earlier communities. Such reports have been described by some unbelievers as ‘fables of the ancients’.

It was clearly revealed then at a time when the Quraysh had already been called upon to accept Islam and whence it started its resistance to the call. Indeed, so determined had it become in its opposition at this point that it did not hesitate to level false allegations against the Prophet and his mission. It is such opposition that necessitated the very strong denunciation the surah makes of the unbelievers and the strong warnings it issues both early on and towards its end. Such timing of its revelation is also confirmed by the last image it portrays: “ The unbelievers well-nigh trip you up with their eyes when they hear this reminder. They say 'He is surely mad'" (Verse 51) This is an image of a public address calling on large groups of people to accept the message. Such gatherings most certainly did not take place during the early years of the Islamic message. Indeed, the first such public address was only made three years after the Prophet began to receive Quranic revelations.

The surah refers to some of the offers the unbelievers made to the Prophet, suggesting a compromise over the central issue in dispute, namely that of faith. It says: "They would love that you compromise with them, so that they will also compromise." (Verse 9) Needless to say, such an offer would not have been made at a time when the message was only advocated in private, presented to a few individuals. In such circumstances, it would not have been felt to represent any danger. It is more likely that such offers would only have been made later, when the message advocated itself in public and when the unbelievers realized its far-reaching significance.

We see how several indications confirm that the surah was not revealed in the very early days of the Islamic message, and that at least three years had passed before its revelation. It is highly unlikely that no Qur’anic revelations were made during these three years. On the contrary, it is much more likely that many surahs and passages were revealed in the intervening period, presenting the Islamic faith without strongly denouncing the unbelievers in the way we find in this surah. Having said all this, however, one can still not say that this surah, as well as Surahs 73 and 74, were revealed late into the Islamic period.

The tree of the Islamic faith, in its real, clean and pure form, was being planted on earth. It was totally unfamiliar to the prevailing state of ignorance, or jahiliyyah, not only in the Arabian Peninsula but throughout the globe. Indeed there was a great gulf between it and the deviant and colourless form of the Abrahamic faith, mixed with local superstitions, which the Arab idolaters upheld. What Muhammad (peace be upon him) advocated was a clear, straightforward, simple, yet comprehensive and profound faith that was fully in line with the original pure faith preached by Abraham, but to a standard of perfection that fits its being the last message to mankind, addressing them in their stage of maturity and remaining intact to the end of time. Take, for example, the notion of multiple deities that assigns partners to God: in this respect, the Arabs worshipped angels, statues, the jinn and spirits. Their beliefs were a medley of corrupt and hollow notions. Compare these with the noble picture the Qur’an paints of God and His majestic power that takes care of every creature. The gulf between the two is immense.

Similarly wide is the gulf between the class system that prevailed in Arabia, the clerical nature of its religion and the monopoly of privileges, such as custodianship of the Ka(bah, on the one hand and the equality of all people preached by Islam and every individual’s direct relation with God as explained in the Qur’an on the other. Likewise, the morality advocated by the Prophet Muhammad was a world apart from the values that prevailed in Arabia’s jahiliyyah society.

This great gulf between the new faith and the Quraysh’s beliefs, values and practices was sufficient to bring about direct conflict between the two camps. There were, however, other factors which perhaps were, to the Quraysh, more serious than the issue of faith. There were, for example, social factors, some of which prompted them to suggest what is reported in the Qur’an: “ They also say, 'Why was not this Quran revealed to some great man of the two cities?”' (43: 31) The two cities mentioned here are Makkah and Ta’if. Despite the fact that the Prophet was a descendent of the noblest family in the Quraysh, the very fact that he was not the chief of his clan made it very difficult for their chiefs to accept his leadership. In that social environment, position in one’s clan was of paramount importance.

Family factors also played their part. We see such significance in the fact that ‘Amr ibn Hisham, better known as Abu Jahl, stubbornly refused to accept the truth of the Islamic message, despite his being certain of it, because the Prophet preaching it belonged to the ‘Abd Manaf clan.

This is recounted in the story ofAbu Jahl, Abu Sufyan and al-Akhnas ibn Shariq who each went out individually, on three consecutive nights, to listen to the Qur’an being recited by the Prophet. Every morning, they met on their way back home and started blaming each other, pledging that they would never do this again, lest their actions encourage others to listen to the Qur’an. When al-Akhnas asked Abu Jahl what he thought of what he heard Muhammad reciting, the latter answered: “We have competed with the clan of (Abd Manaf for honours: they fed the poor, and we did the same; they provided generous support to those who needed it and we did the same. When we were together on the same level, like two racehorses running neck and neck, they said that one of their number was a Prophet receiving revelations from on high! When can we attain such an honour? By God, we shall never believe in him.”1