Sura hiyo kisha inaendelea kufichua ubaguzi na udanganyifu wao zaidi. Inasema: “Watakapoambiwa, ‘Aminini yale aliyoteremsha Mwenyezi Mungu,’ husema, ‘Tunaamini yale tuliyoteremshiwa sisi.’ Hukataa yote mengine, ingawa ni haki, yakithibitisha yale waliyonayo.” (Aya ya 91)
The sūrah then goes further in exposing their bigotry and deception. It says: “When it is said to them, ‘Believe in what God has revealed,’ they say, ‘We believe in what has been revealed to us.’ They deny everything else, although it is the truth, corroborating the revelations they have.” (Verse 91)
Hilo lingekuwa jibu la Mayahudi wa Madina kila walipoitwa kukubali Uislamu na Qur'ani. Waliona kwamba yale ambayo Manabii wao wenyewe walikuwa wamewafundisha yanatosha na yamekamilika, nao walikataa yote mengine, ikiwa ni pamoja na ufunuo aliopewa Isa na Muhammad ﷺ, Nabii wa mwisho kuliko wote (rehema na amani ziwe juu yao wote). Qur'ani inapinga vikali mwitikio huu wa Waisraeli kwa ufunuo wa Mwenyezi Mungu, ilhali ufunuo huo ni "ukweli unaothibitisha yale waliyo nayo." (Aya ya 91)
This would be the reply of the Jews of Madinah whenever they were called upon to acknowledge Islam and the Qur’ān. They considered what their own Prophets had taught them sufficient and complete, and they rejected all else, including the revelations received by Jesus and Muĥammad, the last of all prophets (peace be upon them all). The Qur’ān takes great exception to this reaction by the Israelites to God’s revelations, when these are “the truth, corroborating the revelations they have.” (Verse 91)
Lakini, kwa nini wajisumbue kuhusu ukweli, ikiwa haukuelekezwa kwao peke yao, na inawahusu nini kwamba ufunuo uliotumwa kwa mataifa mengine uthibitishe wao wenyewe? Ubaguzi wao na ufinyu wa fikra zao vilikuwa vya kupindukia kiasi kwamba walikataa hata yale ambayo manabii wao wenyewe waliyahubiri, na hata walithubutu kuwaua baadhi yao. "Sema: 'Basi, kwa nini mliwaua manabii wa Mwenyezi Mungu zamani, ikiwa mlikuwa waumini wa kweli?'" (Aya ya 91) Wangewezaje kuthibitisha madai yao kwamba wanaamini tu yale yaliyoteremshwa kwao kupitia manabii wao, ikiwa walikwenda mbali hadi kuwaua baadhi ya manabii hao?
But, why should they bother about the truth when it is not addressed to them alone, and what concern is it to them that revelations sent to other nations should corroborate their own? Their bigotry and narrow-mindedness were so extreme that they had even rejected what their own Prophets had preached, and dared even to kill some of them. “Say: ‘Why, then, did you in the past kill God’s prophets, if you were true believers?’“ (Verse 91) How could they substantiate their claims to believe only in what had been revealed to them through their Prophets if they went as far as killing some of these prophets?
Zaidi ya hayo, walikataa ufunuo ambao Musa, nabii wao mkuu kuliko wote na mwokozi wa taifa lao, aliwafikishia. "Musa alikujieni na hoja zilizo wazi, lakini baada ya kuondoka kwake mkakiuka mipaka, mkaabudu ndama:" (Aya ya 92)
Je, kuabudu kwao ndama, wakati Musa bado yu hai, kunaweza kabisa kuchukuliwa kuwa ishara ya imani? Je, kunaunga mkono hoja yao kwamba wanaamini yale waliyofunuliwa?
Worse still, they rejected the revelations Moses, their most senior Prophet and the saviour of their nation, had conveyed to them. “Moses came to you with clear proof, but in his absence you transgressed, worshipping the calf:” (Verse 92) Could their worship of the calf, with Moses still alive, ever be considered a sign of faith? Does it support their argument that they believe in what has been revealed to them?
Wala, hilo halikuwa tukio pekee la uvunjaji wao wa mipaka na uasi wao.
Nor, indeed, was that the only instance of their transgression and rebellion.
Hapo awali, Mungu alikuwa ameweka agano nao chini ya Mlima Sinai, lakini punde si punde walikuwa wamevunja agano hilo waziwazi. "Tulikubali ahadi yenu thabiti, na Tukauinua Mlima Sinai juu yenu, Tukisema: Shikilieni kwa nguvu na uthabiti yale Tuliyowapa, na sikilizeni." Wakasema: "Tumesikia, lakini tunaasi." Kwa sababu ya kufuru yao, waliletewa kunywa ndama moyoni mwao.
Earlier, God had made the covenant with them under Mount Sinai, but soon they were in clear breach of that covenant. “We accepted your solemn pledge, and We raised Mount Sinai above you, saying, ‘Take with firmness and strength what We have given you and hearken to it.’ They said, ‘We hear but we disobey.’ For their unbelief they were made to drink the calf into their hearts.” (Verse 93)
Mtindo wa usemi unabadilika kutoka kuelekeza moja kwa moja hadi kueleza matukio ya zamani. Hivyo, unawakabili Wana wa Israili kwa mienendo yao ya zamani, na unawafahamisha Waislamu na wanadamu kwa ujumla kuhusu mienendo hii ya Kiyahudi. Kisha unamwamuru Mtume Muhammad ﷺ kulaani kabisa imani ya ajabu waliyodai kuwa nayo, ikiwa ingewalazimu kukataa ukweli waziwazi: "Sema: 'Ovu ni kile ambacho imani yenu inawaamrisha, ikiwa kweli ni waumini.'" (Aya ya 93)
The mode of expression changes from direct address to that of reporting past events. Thus, it confronts the Israelites with their past attitudes, and informs Muslims and mankind generally of these Jewish attitudes. It then instructs the Prophet Muĥammad to condemn utterly the bizarre faith they claimed to have if it would require them to flagrantly reject the truth: “Say, ‘Vile is that which your faith enjoins upon you, if indeed you are believers.’“ (Verse 93)
Maneno mawili ya kuvutia mara moja yanatuvutia hapa. La kwanza ni:
Two fascinating expressions immediately draw our attention here. The first is:
"Walisema: 'Tumesikia lakini tunaasi.'" Kwa hakika, hawakutamka maneno 'lakini tunaasi'. Basi imekuwaje maneno haya kuhusishwa nao? Ni suala tu la kuonyesha mtazamo kana kwamba unajieleza kikamilifu. Hivyo, maneno yao halisi yalisema kwamba walikuwa wamesikia ujumbe, lakini matendo yao yalisema kwamba waliuasi. Ukweli huu ulikuwa kauli yenye uhalisia zaidi na sahihi zaidi ya mtazamo wao kuliko maneno waliyoyatamka. Sura hii inasisitiza mojawapo ya kanuni za msingi kabisa za Kiislamu: matendo yanathibitisha maneno. Matendo lazima yaendane na maneno ili maneno hayo yawe na maana au thamani yoyote ile.
“They said: ‘We hear but we disobey.’“ Indeed, they did not utter the words, ‘but we disobey’. How is it then that these words are attributed to them? It is simply a question of portraying an attitude as though it is fully expressive. Thus, their actual words said that they had heard the message, but their actions said that they had disobeyed it. This reality was a much more authentic and accurate statement of their attitude than the words they uttered. The sūrah here is emphasizing one of the most fundamental Islamic principles: actions lend validity to words. Actions must be in harmony with words in order for the words to have any meaning or value whatsoever.
Usemi wa pili ni: "Kwa sababu ya kukufuru kwao walilazimishwa kunywa ndama ndani ya mioyo yao." Kejeli na ukali wa taswira hii viko wazi kabisa. Walilazimishwa kunywa kitu kichafu; lakini ni nini? Si kitu kingine isipokuwa ndama, ambaye anaonyeshwa kuwa amelazimishwa kuingizwa ndani ya mioyo yao. Ni rahisi kujisahau kwa taswira hii kiasi cha kupuuza karibu maana halisi ya sitiari iliyotumika hapa. Inaonyesha kwamba mapenzi yao na ibada yao kwa ndama ni makubwa kiasi kwamba yanapita ndani ya mishipa yao.
The second expression is: “For their unbelief they were made to drink the calf into their hearts.” The sarcasm and the severity of the image are unmistakable. They were forcibly made to drink something nasty; but what is it? It is nothing other than the calf, which is shown to be forced into their hearts. It is easy to get carried away by this image so as to almost overlook the real significance of the metaphor used here. It shows their love and adoration for the calf to be so strong that it runs in their veins.
Taswira hizi zenye nguvu ni chombo kimoja tu cha mtindo usioweza kuigwa wa Qur'ani.
Such powerful imagery is but one tool of the inimitable Qur’ānic style.
Wayahudi wamefanya kelele nyingi wakidai kuwa wao ni "watu waliochaguliwa na Mungu", wakidai kwamba wana haki ya kipekee ya asili ya kuongozwa kimungu. Zaidi ya hayo, wamedai kwamba, tofauti na jamii nyingine, wokovu wao umehakikishwa, katika maisha haya na katika maisha ya Akhera.
The Jews have made a great fuss claiming themselves to be ‘God’s chosen people’, alleging that they enjoy an exclusive inherent right to divine guidance. They have further claimed that, unlike other communities, their salvation is guaranteed, both in this life and in the life to come.
Kwa maana hiyo, madai haya yanawatenga wafuasi wa Muhammad mbali na rehema ya Mungu katika Akhera. Lengo lao nyuma ya madai kama haya lilikuwa kudhoofisha imani ya Waislamu katika dini yao wenyewe, na katika ahadi walizopewa na Mtume ﷺ, pamoja na Qur'ani. Mungu anamwagiza Mtume Muhammad ﷺ awapinge Wayahudi kwa kuwataka wajiunge na Waislamu katika sala ya dhati kwa Mungu, ili kuiangamiza kundi lililozua uongo. Anasema: “Sema, ‘Ikiwa makao ya mwisho kwa Mungu ni yenu peke yenu, kwa kuwatenga wengine wote, basi takeni mauti, ikiwa madai yenu ni kweli.’” (Aya ya 94)
By implication, these claims exclude Muĥammad’s followers from God’s grace in the hereafter. Their aim behind such claims was to undermine the Muslims’ trust in their own religion and in the promises made to them by the Prophet and in the Qur’ān. God instructs Prophet Muĥammad to challenge the Jews to join the Muslims in an earnest prayer to God to destroy the party that fabricated lies. He says: “Say, ‘If the ultimate abode with God is yours alone, to the exclusion of all others, then wish for death, if your claim is true.’’’ (Verse 94)
Hii inafuatiwa mara moja na dai kwamba Mayahudi hawangekubali changamoto kama hiyo wala kuomba kifo kwa sababu walijua kwamba wao ndio waliokuwa wakisema uongo. Kwa hiyo, wangekuwa na hofu kwamba huenda Mungu angeyajibu maombi yao.
This is immediately followed by the assertion that the Jews would not take up such a challenge or pray for death because they were aware that they were the ones who were lying. Hence, they would be afraid that God might answer their prayers.
Walitambua vizuri kwamba matendo yao na mwenendo wao haviwastahilishi kupata neema yoyote katika Akhera. Lau wangekufa mara moja, hasara yao ingekuwa kamili:
They were well aware that their actions and their record did not qualify them for any grace in the hereafter. Were they to die straightaway, their loss would be complete:
maisha yao hapa duniani yangekatizwa mapema, na wangepata hasara katika maisha ya Akhera.
their life here would be cut short and they would come to grief in the life hereafter.
Hii, sura inathibitisha, ingemaanisha tu kwamba wangepigana kwa nguvu zao zote ili wabaki hai, na hivyo kuwawekea sawa na washirikina: "Lakini hawatatamani kamwe kwa sababu ya yale ambayo mikono yao imeyatenda katika maisha haya. Mwenyezi Mungu anajua vyema madhalimu. Hakika utawakuta wanashikamana na maisha kwa hamu kuliko watu wengine wote, hata kuliko washirikina. Kila mmoja wao angependa kuishi miaka elfu moja, ingawa kupewa umri mrefu hakungeweza kumwokoa na adhabu. Mwenyezi Mungu anaona yote wanayoyafanya." (Aya 95-96)
This, the sūrah affirms, would only mean that they would fight tooth and nail to stay alive, putting them on a par with the idolaters: “But they will never wish for it because of what their hands have wrought in this life. God is well aware of the wrongdoers. Indeed, you shall find that they cling to life more eagerly than any other people, even more than the idolaters. Each one of them would love to live a thousand years, although the grant of a long life could not save him from punishment. God sees all that they do.” (Verses 95-96)
Katika aya hizi, Qur'ani inaelekeza kwenye sifa nyingine ya kudharauliwa ya Mayahudi: tamaa yao ya woga ya kuishi, bila kujali gharama, na bila kujali ubora, heshima na utu. Hili limethibitishwa na mwenendo wa Mayahudi katika hatua zote za historia yao; vichwa vyao huinuka tu pale fimbo ya mnyanyasaji inapoondolewa, lakini fimbo inapoinuliwa mbele yao, vichwa vyao huinama na wao hukubali kwa hofu na utumwa, wakikimbia kutafuta uhai, aina yoyote ya uhai.
In these verses, the Qur’ān points to another contemptible characteristic of the Jews: their craven desire to live, no matter at what price and regardless of quality, honour and dignity. This has been borne out by Jewish behaviour during all stages of their history; their heads are raised only when the big stick of the tormentor is put away, but once the stick is wielded before them, their heads are bowed and they acquiesce in fear and servility, scurrying for life, any kind of life.
Kila mmoja wao angependa kuishi miaka elfu moja kwa sababu hawaamini maisha ya baadaye, baada ya maisha haya ya sasa kumalizika. Mtu anapokubali kwamba siku zake duniani zina idadi lakini anadhani kwamba maisha hapa hayaongozi kwenye maisha ya baadaye, basi maisha haya yangeonekana mafupi sana, bila kujali yatadumu miaka mingapi. Kwa hiyo, kuamini maisha baada ya kifo ni baraka na chanzo cha msukumo kinacholeta matumaini, kwa kuwa mwanadamu kwa asili anatamani matumaini yanayopita mbali zaidi ya miaka yake ya maisha iliyohesabiwa. Kuyakataa matumaini ya uwepo usiokufa na wenye furaha ni kuonyesha kutothamini maana halisi ya maisha.
Each of them would wish to live a thousand years because they do not believe in a future life, after this present one is over. When one accepts that one’s days on earth are numbered but supposes that life here does not lead to a future life, this life would then seem very short, no matter how many years it lasts. Therefore, to believe in life after death is a blessing and a source of inspiration that brings hope, since man naturally entertains hopes that go far beyond his numbered years of life. To discard the hopes of an immortal and happy existence reflects a lack of appreciation for the very meaning of life.
Mbali ya kuwa imani ya haki kamili ya Mwenyezi Mungu na malipo Yake ya ukarimu, imani katika Akhera ni udhihirisho wa thamani na nguvu ya maisha yenyewe, isiyofungiwa wala kuzuiliwa na mipaka ya dunia hii. Inaunganisha kuwepo kwa binadamu na maisha yanayokwenda mbali zaidi ya haya, kufikia nyanja na ulimwengu ambao mipaka yake inajulikana kwa Mwenyezi Mungu Mtukufu peke yake.
Besides being a belief in God’s absolute justice and His most gracious reward, belief in the hereafter is an expression of the value and vigour of life itself, not confined to, or restricted by, the limits of this world. It links man’s existence to a life that goes far beyond this one, to reach spheres and realms the edges of which are known only to God Almighty.