Kimdir bilim egasi bo'lishni da'vo qilgan ana shunday odamlardan birining "Islom demokratiya bilan boshlanib, diktatura bilan tugaydi" degan so'zini eshitganda, kulishni ham, yig'lashni ham bilmay qolasan.

One does not know whether to laugh or cry when one hears the statement of one of those people claiming to have knowledge, whilst saying that Islam begins with Democracy and ends with dictatorship.

Ular o'z da'volarining dalili sifatida Allohning shu so'zini keltiradilar: “Ularga ishlarida maslahat solgin. Qachonki qat'iy qaror qabul qilsang, Allohga tayan.” [TMQ 3:159] Mavzuimizga tegishli yana bir fikr hali muhokama qilinmagan: ular Qur'on va Sunnat Shuro mavzusiga ishora qilganda, Islom Demokratiyani ma'qullagan, deb hisoblaydilar. Ular deydilar: Demokratiya Shurodan boshqa narsa emas. Demokratiya xalq fikriga tayanganidek, Islom ham bizga boshqa odamlarning fikrini olishni buyurgan. U zot 􀀬 aytdilar: “Ularga ishlarida maslahat solgin.” [TMQ 3:159]; U zot 􀀬 yana aytdilar: “Ularning ishlari o'zaro maslahat bilan hal qilinadi.” [TMQ 42:38]; Rasululloh ﷺ esa o'zlarining amaliy, siyosiy va harbiy hayotlarida doimo sahobalari bilan maslahatlashib, ularning fikrlarini qabul qilganlar. Bu Qur'onning buyrug'i va Rasululloh ﷺ qilgan amalning haqiqati ekan, musulmonlar unga ergashishlari kerak, deydilar. Bundan tashqari ular, Shuro bilan Demokratiya o'rtasidagi farq faqat so'z ma'nosidagi farq, deydilar. Ma'nolar bir xil bo'lsa, turli nomlar muammo emas, deydilar.

They cite as proof the saying of Allah 􀀬; “And consult them in their affairs. Then when you have taken a decision, put your trust in Allah.” [TMQ 3:159] One idea relevant to our subject still remains to be discussed, which is their view that Islam approved of Democracy when the Qur’an and the Sunnah alluded to the subject of Shura. They say: Democracy is nothing but Shura. Just as Democracy is built on taking the opinion of people, Islam has also ordered us to take other people’s opinions. He 􀀬 said; “And consult them in their affairs.” [TMQ 3:159]; and He 􀀬 also said; “And who conduct their affairs by mutual consultation.” [TMQ 42:38]; and the Messenger 􀁕 in his practical, political and military life, used to constantly consult his companions and adopt their opinions. Since this is the command of the Qur’an and the reality of what the Messenger 􀁕 did, then Muslims should follow it. In addition they say, that the difference between Shura and Democracy is only semantic. Different names are not a problem as long as the meanings are the same.

Biz demokratiyaga chaqiruvchilarning turli xil va guruhlardan iborat ekanini bilamiz. Ular orasida yomon niyatli aldovchilar ham bor, va demokratiyaning haqiqatini bilmagan holda samimiy bo'lgan kishilar ham bor. Samimiy guruhlar bunday g'oyalardan uzoq turishlari shart, aks holda ular jaholat tufayli Allohga ibodat qiladigan, ammo bu ularni gunohga olib boradigan kishiga o'xshab qoladilar. Samimiy odamning tabiati tavba qilish, o'zini tiyish va fikr yuritishdir.

We know that those who call for Democracy are of various types and groups. From amongst them you have the evil deceiver, and also the sincere one who is ignorant of the reality of Democracy. The sincere groups are required to keep far away from such ideas, otherwise they will be like the one who worships Allah 􀀬 out of ignorance, and it will lead him to commit sin. It is the nature of a sincere person to repent, restrain himself and reflect.

Shunday odamlar bir vaqtlar Sotsializm Islomdan ekanini va Payg‘ambar ﷺ ularning imomi ekanini aytishgan. Endi Sotsializmning badbo‘y hidi yo‘qolgach, ular hozir qanday javob berishadi? Xuddi shu gap Demokratiya haqida ham to‘g‘ri keladi, u hozir o‘lim azobining so‘nggi damlarida turibdi. Unda bu da’vat tarafdorlarining qanday umidi bor? Bunday g‘oya Islomning manfaati uchun emas, balki Demokratiyaning manfaati uchun. Uning yolg‘onini fosh qilish o‘rniga, ular uni o‘zlarining eng oliy fikri sifatida qabul qilishmoqda. Uni xalq orasiga olib borishmoqda, o‘rniga esa uni oyoq ostida ezib tashlashlari kerak edi.

Such people once said that Socialism is from Islam and that the Messenger 􀁕 is their Imaam. Now that the putrid smell of Socialism has disappeared, how will they respond now? The same applies to Democracy, which is in its final pangs of death. So what hope do the advocates of this call have? Such an idea is not for the benefit of Islam but for the benefit of Democracy. Instead of exposing its falsehood, they adopt it as their highest thought. They carry it to the people instead of crushing it under their feet.

Allohning 􀀬 amrini amalga oshirish Allohning kalomini eng oliy qilish va dinni faqat Allohga xos qilish orqali ro‘yobga chiqadi. Buni faqat e’tiqodi ravshan, tuzilishida ogoh, aqidasi yorqin, shariat hukmlarini chuqur tushunadigan va yot fikrlarni hamda begona ta’riflarni rad etadigan, voqelikka bo‘ysunishni va vaziyatlar ta’siriga tushishni qabul qilmaydigan, tushunishi to‘g‘ri yo‘naltirilgan guruhgina amalga oshirishi mumkin.

The realisation of Allah’s 􀀬 command is by making the Word of Allah the highest, and making the deen exclusively for Allah 􀀬. This can only be achieved by a group that is guided in its understanding and aware in its establishment, and enlightened in its creed, deep in its understanding of the Sharee’ah rules and that rejects the alien thoughts and the foreign definitions. It does not accept to bow to the reality or fall under the influence of the circumstances.