"Islam ta'limotlari adolatli va muloyim munosabat hamda xulq-atvor borasida ulug' an'analarni qoldirgan bo'lib, odamlarni olijanoblik va bag'rikenglikka ilhomlantiradi. Bular eng yuksak darajadagi inson ta'limotlari bo'lib, shu bilan birga amaliy jihatdan bajarilishi mumkin bo'lgan ta'limotlardir. Bu ta'limotlar shunday jamiyatni vujudga keltirdiki, unda yuraksizlik, jamoaviy zulm va adolatsizlik o'zidan oldingi barcha jamiyatlarga nisbatan eng kam darajada bo'lgan.... Islam muloyimlik, odob va birodarlikka to'la." — H.G. Uells So'nggi paytda G'arbning Islomni haqorat qilishi yana bir bor namoyon bo'ldi: noma'lum yozuvchi Sherri Jons "Madinaning marvaridi" kitobini nashr ettirdi, garchi dunyo bo'ylab musulmon tashkilotlari qattiq e'tiroz bildirgan bo'lsa ham. Yana bir bor musulmonlardan G'arbning so'z erkinligi tushunchasiga bo'ysunish va Sherrining Payg'ambar Muhammad ﷺ ni haqoratomuz tasvirlashini hurmat qilish talab etilmoqda.

“The Islamic teachings have left great traditions for equitable and gentle dealings and behaviour, and inspire people with nobility and tolerance. These are human teachings of the highest order and at the same time practicable. These teachings brought into existence a society in which hard-heartedness and collective oppression and injustice were the least as compared with all other societies preceding it....Islam is replete with gentleness, courtesy, and fraternity.” --H.G. Wells n the latest bout of West’ s defamation of Islam, an obscure writer Sherry Jones succeeded in the publication of her book Jewel of Medina, despite vehement protests from Muslim groups around the world. Once again Muslims are expected to subscribe to West’ s notion of freedom of expression and respect Sherry’ s offensive portrayal of the Messenger Muhammed (SAW)

with his youngest wife Aisha (RA)ii. Earlier in this year, at least seventeen Danish newspapers vowed to defend freedom of expression and reprinted a degrading caricature of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. The conservative broadsheet Berlingske Tidende wrote in an editorial: "Freedom of expression gives you the right to think, to speak and to draw what you like... no matter how many terrorist plots there are...” It is evident that both Europe and America did not learn anything from the outcry of Muslims that accompanied the newspaper Jyllands-Posten decision to publish the original cartoons in 2005.

with his youngest wife Aisha (RA)ii. Earlier in this year, at least seventeen Danish newspapers vowed to defend freedom of expression and reprinted a degrading caricature of Prophet Mohammed (SAW). The conservative broadsheet Berlingske Tidende wrote in an editorial: "Freedom of expression gives you the right to think, to speak and to draw what you like... no matter how many terrorist plots there are...” It is evident that both Europe and America did not learn anything from the outcry of Muslims that accompanied the newspaper Jyllands-Posten decision to publish the original cartoons in 2005.

Yevropada islomni haqorat qilish butun qitʼani qamrab olgan illatga aylanib bormoqda. Niderlandiya hukumati Niderlandiya parlament aʼzosi Geert Vilders Qur'on haqida haqoratomuz video yaratganida unga qarshi chora ko'rishdan bosh tortdi. Hukumat o'z harakatini so'z erkinligi bilan oqladi. Fransiya va Germaniya hijob kiyishni taqiqlab qo'ydi. Yevropa xavfsizlik kuchlari musulmonlarni shunchaki musulmon bo'lgani uchun muntazam ravishda ta'qib qiladi, hibsga oladi va qiynoqqa soladi.

In Europe Islam bashing is an epidemic that infected the whole continent. The Dutch government refused to take action against Dutch Member of Parliament Geert Wilders who made a derogatory video about the Quran. The government defended Wilder‘s actions by citing freedom of expression. France and Germany have imposed a ban on the wearing of hijabs. European security forces routinely harass, arrest and torture Muslims for simply being Muslims.

Yozuvchilar va jurnalistlar Islomni haqorat qilish erkinligiga ega, ularning bu huquqini siyosatchilar ehtiros bilan himoya qiladilar. Masalan, italyan urush muxbiri Oriana Fallaci "G'azab va g'urur" nomli kitob yozdi, unda u musulmonlarni "baptisteriyalarga siydik qiladigan razil mavjudotlar" va "kalamushlardek ko'payadilar" deb ta'riflagan. Musulmonlarning dahshatiga, Italiyaning mudofaa vaziri Antonio Martino Fallacini bu kitobni yozish jasoratiga ega bo'lgani uchun maqtadi. Buyuk Britaniyada esa erkinlik va bag'rikenglik niqobi ostida hukumat vazirlari muntazam ravishda Islomni kamsitadilar va britaniyalik musulmonlar davlatga sadoqatini bildirishi uchun yangi me'yorlarni belgilaydilar.

Writers and journalists are free to insult Islam and their right to do so is passionately defended by politicians. Take Oriana Fallaci, the Italian war correspondent wrote a book entitled 'Anger and Pride' in which she described Muslims as 'vile creatures who urinate in baptisteries' and 'multiply like rats'. To the horror of Muslims, Italy's Defence Minister, Antonio Martino, praised Fallaci for having the courage to write the book. In Britain under the guise of freedom and tolerance, government ministers routinely denigrate Islam and set new benchmarks for British Muslims to pledge their loyalty to the state.

Musulmonlarning nazarida Amerika — G‘arbning yetakchi davlati — Abu G‘raib va Guantanamoda musulmonlarni tahqirlash va qiynoqqa solish bilan, Iroqdagi masjidlarning vayron qilinishi va haqoratlanishi uchun mas’ul, musulmon ayollarning qadrini past urayotgan va o‘n minglab begunoh musulmonlarni o‘ldirgan davlat sifatida mashhur. Inson huquqlari tashkilotlari, jurnalistlar, huquqshunoslar, AQSh rasmiylari, sobiq mahbuslar va zo‘rlash qurbonlarining guvohliklari Amerikaning Islomga qarshi urushining haqiqiy dahshatini aytib beradi. Bu urushda G‘arbning “diniy erkinlik” va “so‘z erkinligi” haqidagi g‘oyalari diniy tor fikrlilik va musulmonlarga qarshi demagogiyaga yo‘l berdi.

In Muslims eyes, America -- the leading state of the West -- is notorious for the humiliation and torture of Muslims in Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, responsible for the destruction and defilement of Iraq’ s mosques, the debaser of Muslim women and the slayer of tens of thousands of innocent Muslims. Testimonies from human rights organizations, journalists, lawyers, US officials, former prisoners and rape victims all tell the true horror of America’ s war on Islam. In this war, western ideals of 'religious freedom’ and ‘freedom of expression’ have given way to religious intolerance and anti-Muslim demagoguery.

Vashingtondan uzoqda, AQSh ommaviy axborot vositalari, obro'li tahlil markazlari va Prezident Bushning eng yaqin ittifoqchilari qatoriga kiruvchi diniy o'ng qanot yetakchilari so'z erkinligidan foydalanib, Islomni qoralashdi. Rev. Franklin Graham Islomni "juda yovuz va fosiq din" deb atadi. Evangelist Pat Robertson esa Payg'ambar Muhammad ﷺ ni "mutlaqo aqldan ozgan fanatik... talonchi va qaroqchi... qotil" deb atadi. Jerry Falwell Islom Payg'ambarini ﷺ terrorchi deb atadi.

Away from Washington, the US media, esteemed think tanks and leaders of the religious right who are counted among President Bush's closest allies exploited free speech to vilify Islam. Rev. Franklin Graham, described Islam as a "very evil and wicked religion". Evangelist Pat Robertson, called Prophet Muhammad "an absolute wild-eyed fanatic . . . a robber and brigand . . . a killer". Jerry Falwell called the Prophet of Islam a terrorist.

Xalqaro maydonda G'arb diniy erkinlikdan voz kechib, musulmon dunyosidagi zolim rejimlar bilan ittifoqlar tuzishga tez kirishdi. Qirol Abdulla, Musharraf va Karimov rejimlari musulmonlarni islomiy e'tiqodlarini ifodalagani uchun odatdagidek qiynoqqa soladi, qamaydi va o'ldiradi. Shu tariqa ular G'arbning islomga qarshi salib yurishining old saflariga aylandi.

On the international scene the West was quick to sacrifice freedom of religion in preference for forging alliances with despotic regimes across the Muslim world. The regimes of King Abdullah, Musharraf and Karimov that habitually torture, imprison and kill Muslims for expressing their Islamic beliefs became the vanguard for the West’ s crusade against Islam.

G'arb individlar istagan xudoga sig'inish erkinligiga ega ekanini da'vo qiladi. Ammo amalda bu odamlar o'rtasida doimiy nizolarga olib keladi, chunki ba'zilarning e'tiqod qilgan dinlari va amallari boshqalar tomonidan haqorat va hurmatsizlik sifatida talqin qilinishi mumkin. Shu sababli g'arb hukumatlari doimo nizolarga aralashadi va boshqalarning huquqlarini cheklash evaziga ba'zi odamlarning diniy huquqlarini himoya qilish uchun qonunchilikka murojaat qiladi. Ko'pincha din erkinligidan haqiqiy foyda ko'radiganlar, e'tiqodlari hukumat manfaatlariga mos keladigan yoki hukumatga ta'sir o'tkazish imkoniyatiga ega bo'lgan shaxslar yoki guruhlardir. Shuning uchun Amerikadagi diniy o'ng kuchlarga Islomga hujum qilishga ruxsat beriladi, chunki ularning olovli nutqi Prezident Bushning Islomga qarshi urushi bilan to'liq uyg'undir. Biroq, agar o'sha konservativ xristianlar yahudiylarni yoki Isroil sionistik davlatini haqorat qilganda, AQSh hukumati ularning haqoratlarini to'xtatish uchun qat'iy choralar ko'rgan bo'lardi. Asosiy oqim ommaviy axborot vositalarining Jimmi Kartenni chetlashtirishi bunga e'tiborga loyiq misoldir.

The West claims that individuals are free to worship whatever deity they choose. But in practice this leads to perpetual conflicts amongst people, as religious beliefs and practices professed by some can be interpreted as offensive and insulting to others. Hence, western governments are constantly intervening in the disputes and resort to legislation to protect the religious rights of some people by depriving others. Often, the real benefactors of freedom of religion are those individuals or groups whose beliefs coincide with the interests of the government or those who possess the ability to exert influence over the government. That is why the religious right in America is allowed to attack Islam because their fiery rhetoric is in full harmony with President Bush's war on Islam. However, if the same conservative Christians were to insult Jews or the Zionist state of Israel the US government would adopt stern measures to curb their insults. The ostracizing of Jimmy Cater by the main stream media is a noteworthy example.

G'arb hukumatlari diniy erkinlik yoki so'z erkinligini yopiq jamiyatlarni G'arb qadriyatlariga ochish uchun ishlatadi, yoki manfaatlariga mos kelmasa, erkinlikni butunlay e'tiborsiz qoldiradi. Karimovning Andijonda musulmonlarni qirg'in qilishi holatida G'arb javobini yumshatishni tanladi, chunki noroziliklarda qatnashganlar demokratiyaning emas, balki Islomning ashaddiy amal qiluvchilari edi. Bunday ikkiyuzlamachilik musulmonlar orasida Amerika va Yevropa faqat Islom qadriyatlari va amaliyotlarini butunlay yo'q qilishga manfaatdor, degan tasavvurni yanada kuchaytiradi.

Western governments use religious freedom or freedom of expression to pry open societies closed to western values or totally ignore freedom when it does not concur with their interests. In the case of Karimov’ s massacre of Muslims in Andijoniii, the West has chosen to dilute its response, as the protesters were avid practitioners of Islam and not democracy. Such hypocrisy only serves to underscore the perception amongst Muslims that America and Europe are solely interested in the utter destruction of Islamic values and practices.

Islom erkin fikrlash yoki so‘z erkinligi haqidagi xayoliy g‘oyani qabul qilmaydi, bunda bir qancha odamlar qaysi e’tiqod va fikrlar qonunan ayb qo‘yilmaydigan, qaysi e’tiqod va fikrlar esa cheksiz tanqid va qonunchilik ostida bo‘lishi kerakligini hal qiladi. Islom hayot, sha’n, qon, mol-mulk, e’tiqod, irq va aqlni Islom davlati himoya qilishini belgilaydi. Xalifalikning barcha fuqarolariga, ular musulmon bo‘lishidan qat’i nazar, bu huquqlar kafolatlanadi. Islom, shuningdek, zimmiylarning (Xalifalik fuqarosi bo‘lgan g‘ayrimusulmonlarning) hech qanday qasosdan yoki e’tiqodlarini haqorat qilishdan qo‘rqmasdan ibodat qilish huquqini himoya qiladi. Allohning Elchisi ﷺ aytdilar: "Kim zimmiyga zarar yetkazsa, u menga zarar yetkazgan bo‘ladi, menga zarar yetkazgan kishi esa Allohga zarar yetkazgan bo‘ladi". Shu sababli, musulmonga g‘ayrimusulmonning e’tiqodini haqorat qilish yoki ularning ibodatxonalariga zarar yetkazish taqiqlanadi. Islom tarixi Xalifalik soyasi ostida g‘ayrimusulmonlarning diniy huquqlarini kafolatlash qobiliyati bilan beqiyosdir.

Islam does not believe in the fanciful idea of freedom of religion or freedom of expression, where a handful of men decide which beliefs and thoughts are legally beyond reproach, and which beliefs and thoughts are subject to unfettered criticism and legislation. Islam stipulates that life, honour, blood, property, belief, race and the mind are to be protected by the Islamic State. All the citizens of the Caliphate are guaranteed these rights, irrespective of whether they are Muslim or non-Muslims. Islam also protects the rights of non-Muslims to worship without any fear of retribution or vilification of their beliefs. The Messenger of Allah (SAW) said: "One who hurts a dhimmi (non-Muslim citizen of the Caliphate), he hurts me and the one who hurts me, hurts Allah" Therefore, it is prohibited for a Muslim to insult the beliefs of a non-Muslim or to harm their places of worship. Islamic history is unrivalled in its capacity to guarantee the religious rights of non-Muslims under the shade of the Caliphate.

Muslimlar, zolim rejimlar ostida yashayotganlar, ya'ni G'arb tomonidan qo'llab-quvvatlanayotgan hukumatlar hukmronligi ostida yashayotganlar, shuni anglashlari kerakki, namoyishlar o'tkazish yoki G'arb mollarini boykot qilish G'arbning ularga qarshi yangi tajovuzkor harakatlarini to'xtatmaydi. G'arbni va uning dastyorlarini Islomga hujum qilish hamda musulmonlarni tahqirlashdan to'xtatishning yagona yo'li Xalifalikni qayta tiklashdir. Xalifalik so'nggi kunlarigacha musulmonlarning huquqlari himoya qilingan edi. Sulton Abdulhamid II hukmronligi davrida Britaniya Allah Elchisi (SAW) hayotini tahqirlovchi tarzda ifodalagan spektaklni sahnalashga qaror qildi. Buni eshitgan Sulton Abdulhamid spektaklni to'xtatish uchun Britaniya hukumatiga shikoyat qildi. Britaniya hukumati esa so'z erkinligiga ishora qilib, spektakl o'tkazish qarorini himoya qildi. Lekin Sulton Abdulhamid Britaniyaga harbiy harakat bilan tahdid qilgach, Britaniya darhol orqaga chekindi.

Muslims living under the tyrannical rule of regimes supported by the West need to realize that holding demonstration or boycotting western goods will not prevent the West from undertaking further acts of aggression against them. The only way to prevent the West and her surrogates from attacking Islam and humiliating Muslims is to re-establish the Caliphate. The rights of the Muslims were protected, until the very last days of the Caliphate. During the rule of Sultan Abdul Hamid II, Britain decided to stage a play, which depicted the life of the Messenger of Allah (SAW) in a derogatory manner. On hearing this Sultan Abdul Hamid complained to the British government to stop the play. The British government defended its decision to hold the play citing free speech. But when Sultan Abdul Hamid threatened Britain with military action Britain immediately relented.

2008-yil 7-oktyabr

October 7, 2008