“Dunyoda amalga oshirilayotgan ishning yarmi narsalarni aslida bo‘lmagan ko‘rinishda ko‘rsatishga qaratilgan.” — Elias Root Beadle Hali bitta ovoz ham berilmasdan oldin Amerika Eron prezidentlik saylovini rad etishga qaror qilgan edi. Bush shunday dedi: “Hokimiyat demokratiyaning asosiy talablarini e’tiborsiz qoldiradigan saylov jarayoni orqali hokimiyatni saqlab qolgan, saylanmagan bir guruh qo‘lida.”viii Saylovdan keyin esa Amerika tezda saylov jarayonini nuqsonli deb atadi va Eronning mintaqadagi demokratiyaga intilish yo‘nalishidan orqada qolayotganini ta’kidladi.

“Half the work that is done in this world is to make things appear what they are not.” -- Elias Root Beadle Even before a single vote had been cast, America had already decided to dismiss the Iranian presidential election. Bush said, “Power is in the hands of an unelected few who have retained power through an electoral process that ignores the basic requirements of democracy.”viii After the election, America was quick to describe the electoral process as flawed and that Iran was out of step with moves towards democracy in the region.

Biroq, Amerikaning mintaqada va undan tashqarida olib borgan harakatlarini tekshirib ko'rish shuni ko'rsatadiki, demokratiyaga zid keladigan aynan Amerikadir. Demokratiyaning asosiy tamoyillaridan biri shundaki, saylovlar adolatli o'tkazilishi va mahalliy yoki xorijiy aralashuvdan xoli bo'lishi shart.

Yet scrutiny of American actions in the region and beyond demonstrates that it is America that is out of step with democracy. One of the basic tenets of democracy is that elections must be held fairly and free from local or foreign interference.

Ammo bu narsa Falastin, Iroq va Afg'onistondagi saylovlarda kuzatilmadi. Bu saylovlar chet el bosqini ostida o'tkazildi, xavfsizlik juda past edi, saylovchilar ovoz berishdan qo'rqardi va ishtirok etish ko'rsatkichi, kamida aytganda, shubhali edi. Shunga qaramay, Amerika bu saylovlarni demokratiya g'alabasi deb ulug'ladi.

However, this was not observed during the elections in Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan. These elections were conducted under foreign occupation, insecurity was rampant, voters were too frightened to vote and the turnout was dubious to say the least. Despite this, America hailed the elections as a victory for democracy.

Shuningdek, rahbarlarni tanlash, konstitutsiyalarni tuzish va saylovlarni o‘tkazish — bularning barchasi Amerikaning homiyligi ostida amalga oshirildi. Amerika Abbos, Karzay va Ja'fariyni Amerikaga yoqadigan siyosatni amalga oshirishni nazorat qilish uchun qo‘l bilan tanladi. Afg‘oniston va Iroq holatida Amerika Loya Jirga va Iroq Hukumat Kengashidan foydalanib, Afg‘oniston va Iroq xalqi ustidan o‘z hukmronligini ta'minlaydigan Amerika ruhidagi qoidalarni mustahkamladi.

Furthermore, the selection of the leaders, the formulating of the constitutions and the convening of elections were all conducted under the guardianship of America. America handpicked Abbas, Karzai and Jaffari to oversee the implementation of pro-American policies. In the case of Afghanistan and Iraq, America used the Loya Jirga and Iraqi Governing Council to enshrine American inspired canons that would ensure her dominance over the people of Afghanistan and Iraq.

Qaytarmasdan va uyalmasdan, Amerika hali ham Islomchilar tahdidi ostidagi ko'plab musulmon davlatlarining saylov jarayoniga aralashishda davom etmoqda. Amerika ehtiyotkorlik choralarini ko'rib, Afg'oniston va Falastinda parlament saylovlarini keyinga qoldirdi. Falastin holatida Amerika Abbosga saylov qonunini o'zgartirishni buyurdi, shunda Hamas parlamentda ko'pchilik o'rinlarni qo'lga kiritmasligi uchun.

Undeterred and unashamed, America still continues to interfere in the electoral process of many Muslim countries threatened by Islamists, America has taken the precautionary step of postponing the parliamentarian elections in Afghanistan and Palestine. In the case of Palestine, America ordered Abbas to amend election law, so as to prevent Hamas from winning a majority of the seats in the parliament.

Amerikaning Saudiya Arabistonidagi shahar kengashi saylovlarini, Misrdagi yaqinlashib kelayotgan prezidentlik saylovlarini ochiqdan-ochiq qo‘llab-quvvatlashi va Livandagi saylovlarda ovoz berish foizining pastligiga nisbatan sukutga cho‘kishi (Suriya bosqinchiligi davrida ovoz berish foizi yuqoriroq edi)

America’ s unabashed support for the municipal elections in Saudi Arabia, the upcoming presidential elections in Egypt and her silence over the low turnout in the Lebanese election (the turnout was higher during Syrian occupation)

Bu ikiyuzlamachilikdan darak beradi va Amerika o‘rta maktablarida o‘rgatiladigan demokratiya standartlariga ancha yetmaydi.

stinks of hypocrisy and falls way short of the democracy standards that are taught in American high schools.

Taqqoslaganda, Eronda prezidentlik saylovlari ancha ishonchliroq. Saylovlar nisbatan xavfsiz sharoitda o‘tkazildi va saylovchilar faolligi 62% ni tashkil etdi. Bu 2004-yilga nisbatan 2% ga yuqori edi.

In comparison, the presidential elections in Iran are much more credible. Elections were conducted in relative safety with a 62% voter turnout. This was 2% higher than the 2004

AQSh prezidentlik saylovi. Rafsanjoniy tomonidan ovoz berilganidek, saylovda qonunbuzilishlar bo‘lgan bo‘lishi mumkin, ammo ular 2000-yilgi AQSh prezidentlik poygasining masxarasi bilan solishtirganda hech narsa emas.

US presidential election. There may have been irregularities as voiced by Rafsanjani but these pale into insignificance when compared to the farce of the 2000 US presidential race.

Демократияни мусулмон мамлакатларга ваъз қилиб ўқишдан кўра, Америка минтақада демократияни издан чиқаришдаги ўз қилмишларини кўриб чиқиши керак. Шубҳасиз, демократиядан узоқлашган томон Америкадир.

Rather than preaching to Muslim countries about the virtues of democracy, America should examine its own handiwork at subverting democracy in the region. Surely it is America that is out of step with democracy.

Ahmadinejad saylovi fundamentalistik hukumatni vujudga keltiradi, deb ta'kidlaydiganlar ham xuddi shunday adashmoqdalar.

Those who argue that the election of Ahmadinejad will usher in a fundamentalist government are equally mistaken.

Iroq inqilobidan beri Eron hech qachon Islomning tayanchi bo'lmagan. Ayatulloh Xumayni ilhomlantirgan Eron konstitutsiyasini sirtdan o'rganish ham uning Islomning ijtimoiy, ta'lim, iqtisodiy va tashqi siyosat sohalaridagi rolini cheklaydigan dunyoviy avtoritar davlat ekanini ko'rsatadi. Islom qonunlarining bir qismi, xolos, xalqning islomiy his-tuyg'ularini yumshatish uchun joriy etilgan.

Since the Iranian revolution, Iran has never been the bastion of Islam. A cursory study of Iran’ s constitution inspired by Ayatollah Khomeini shows that it is a secular autocratic state which limits the role of Islam in social, educational, economic, and foreign affairs. The few laws of Islam that are implemented are designed to mollify the Islamic sentiments of the people.

Bu Eronga Saudiya Arabistoni va Pokiston kabi o‘zini islomiy ko‘rsatadigan davlatlarga o‘xshash islomiy qiyofa beradi.

This gives Iran an Islamic appearance, similar to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan which also pretend to be Islamic.

Eronni islomiy deb e'lon qilib, islomga zid bo'lgan qoidalarni joriy etish Eron rejimini islomdan chetga chiqarib qo'yadi.

Professing Iran to be Islamic, while implementing non- Islamic rules makes the Iranian regime out of step with Islam.

Islom musulmonlarga hayotlarining barcha jabhalarini Qur'on va Sunnatdan olingan qoidalar asosida boshqaradigan hokimni tanlashni farz qilgan. Bunga faqat xalifa saylash va Xilofat davlatini qayta tiklash orqali erishish mumkin. Xilofat ummat uchun qonuniy vakillikni kafolatlaydi, shuningdek, hokimiyatning Allohga tegishli ekanligini ta'minlaydi.

Islam stipulates that Muslims must choose a ruler who will govern all aspects of their lives according to the rules derived from the Quran and the Sunnah. This can only be accomplished by electing a Caliph and re-establishing the Caliphate State. The Caliphate guarantees legitimate representation for the Ummah as well as ensuring that sovereignty belongs to God.

27 iyun, 2005

June 27, 2005