4.7 古兰经中的矛盾之处
4.7 Contradictions In The Qur’aan
《古兰经》向读者提出挑战:如果他们不相信它真的来自真主,就请他们在其中找出任何错误。
The Qur’aan challenges its readers to find any errors in it if they do not believe it is really from God.
“难道他们不深思《古兰经》吗?倘若它不是来自真主,他们必定会在其中发现许多矛盾。”{4:82}
“Will they not consider the Qur’aan carefully? Had it been from other than Allaah, they would have found many contradictions in it.” 63
批评者常提到的少数表面上的“矛盾”,其实很容易解释。
The few apparent “contradictions” commonly mentioned by critics are easily explained.
I'm ready to translate. Please send the English text you'd like rendered into Simplified Chinese, and I'll reply with the translation only.
Case One:
“有批评者写道:‘是召唤合拢,还是撕裂分开?在创造的过程中,天地起初是分开的,并被召唤合拢[41:11],而21:30却说它们原本是一个整体,后来被撕裂开来。’首先让我们看看每节经文的原文。《先知书》章第30节说:”
One critic writes: “Calling together or ripping apart? In the process of creation, heaven and earth were first apart and are called to come together [41:11], while 21:30 states they were originally one piece and then ripped apart.” First let us look at the text of each verse. Verse 30 of Soorah al-Ambiyaa’ states:
“难道那些不信道的人没有看到,天地原本是连在一起的,然后我把它们分开了吗?
“Have not those who disbelieved known that the heavens and the earth were joined together, then I split them apart?
另一方面,《赛季》(Fussilat)章第11和第12节说: Wait — correction: the surah name should be kept as in the original text, which is "Fussilat" (Soorah Fussilat). Corrected translation: 另一方面,《Fussilat》章第11节和第12节说:
On the other hand, verses 11 and 12 of Soorah Fussilat say:
“64”他转向天空,那时天空还是烟雾,对它和大地说:“你们俩,不论情愿还是不情愿,都来吧!”两者回答说:“我们顺从地来了。”于是他在两个时期中判定它们成为七层天,并为每层天启示了它的职责。
“And64 He turned to the heaven, when it was smoke and said to it and the earth: ‘Come, both of you willingly or unwillingly!’—to which both responded, ‘We come in obedience.’ And He decreed that they become seven heavens in two periods of time, and imparted unto each heaven its function.”
令人惊讶的是,一位接受过美国大学教育的批评者竟会在这两节经文之间发现矛盾,因为这类大学所教授的主流宇宙起源理论正是大爆炸理论。天文学家和物理学家认为,宇宙中的全部物质都源于一种密度和温度极高的状态,随后发生爆炸而分裂,温度和密度迅速下降。这使得某些原子核得以形成。他们说,经过一百万年,宇宙已足够冷却,使氢原子和氦原子得以形成。又过了几亿年,膨胀的气体云中的密度涨落最终导致其分离成星系。星系中的气体云随后聚集,形成一颗颗独立的恒星。65 这一模型设想了创造过程中的两个阶段。第一阶段是一团难以想象的致密实体。第二阶段是一团膨胀的高能粒子云,它最终冷却到足以被称为气体云的程度,星系便由此形成。
It is surprising that a critic educated in an American university would find a contradiction between these two verses, considering that the dominant theory of cosmogony taught in such universities is the Big Bang theory. According to astronomers and physicists, all the matter in the universe emerged from a state of extremely high density and temperature, which then split apart in an explosion that led to a rapid decrease in temperature and density. This allowed for the formation of certain atomic nuclei. They say that after a million years the universe was sufficiently cool for hydrogen and helium atoms to form. After a few hundred million years, fluctuations in density in the expanding gas cloud led to an eventual separation into galaxies. Clouds of gas in the galaxies then pulled together to form individual stars.65 This model envisions two stages in the process of creation. The first is an unimaginably dense solid mass. The second is an expanding cloud of high energy particles which eventually cooled enough to be called a gas cloud, from which the galaxies formed.
这位批评者引用的两段古兰经文描述了宇宙历史中的两个阶段。两段经文都没有明确指出哪一种状态先出现,但认为原初存在一团紧密聚合的物质,后来被裂开,从而进入气态("烟雾")阶段,天空随后由此分化而成,这并非牵强的推测。
The two Qur’aanic passages cited by this critic describe two stages in the history of the universe. Neither passage explicitly indicates which state came first, but it is not far-fetched to suppose that there was an original compacted mass that was split asunder, which led to a gaseous (“smoke”) stage, from which the heavens then became differentiated.
Case Two:
Case Two:
“同一位批评者写道:‘人是由什么被创造的?血块[96:1-2],水[21:30, 24:45, 25:54],“发出声响的”(即经过焙烧的)泥土[15:26],尘土[3:59, 30:20, 35:11],无物[19:67],而这又在52:35中被否定,大地[11:61],一滴浓稠的液体[16:4, 75:37]。’让我们来看一下所引用的经文。”
The same critic writes: “What was man created from? A blood clot [96:1-2], water [21:30, 24:45, 25:54], ‘sounding’ (i.e. burned) clay [15:26], dust [3:59, 30:20, 35:11], nothing [19:67] and this is then denied in 52:35, earth [11:61], a drop of thickened fluid [16:4, 75:37].” Let us look at the verses cited:
“人类难道不记得我以前创造了他,当时他什么都不是吗?”66
“Doesn’t the human being remember that I created him before, when he was nothing.” 66
“他们是被无中生有地创造出来的,还是他们自己就是创造者?”67
“Were they created from nothing or were they themselves the creators?” 67
“我用水创造了一切有生命的东西。”68
“And I created every living thing from water.” 68
“安拉从水中创造了每一种爬行的生物。”69
“And Allaah created every crawling creature from water.” 69
“他是用水创造人类的。”70
“And He it is who created the human being from water.” 70
“我确已从发出回声的黏土,即从经过变化的黑色光滑淤泥中创造了人类。”71
“And, indeed, I have created the human being out of sounding clay, out of dark, smooth mud transmuted.” 71
“我确已从发出回声的黏土,即从经过变化的黑色光滑淤泥中创造了人类。”71
“And, indeed, I have created the human being out of sounding clay, out of dark, smooth mud transmuted.” 71
“且在他的迹象中,他从泥土创造了你们。”73
“And among His signs is that He created you from dust.” 73
“你应当奉你创造者的名而诵读。他用凝血创造了人。”74
“Read in the name of your Lord who has created—created the human being from a clinging thing.” 74
“难道他不是一滴被射出的液体吗?” 75
“Was he not a drop of fluid that gushed forth?” 75
“他从一滴液体中创造了人,然而,瞧!他却成了公开的争辩者。”76
“He created the human being from a drop of fluid, then, behold, he becomes an open opponent.” 76
这种所谓矛盾的看法,源于将形而上学、化学和生物学混为一谈,也源于混淆了生物创造过程的不同阶段。前两节经文是从形而上学的角度谈论创造。在第一节中,安拉提醒人类,祂从无到有创造了他们以及整个受造界,这是祂最崇高的属性之一。在第二节中,祂提出一个修辞性的问题,以突出无神论所蕴含的站不住脚的结论:"如果你们否认真主的存在,那么你们相信是虚无把你们带到了世间吗?"因此,这两节经文之间并不存在矛盾。
The perception of contradiction here is a result of confusion between metaphysics, chemistry and biology, and between different stages of the process of biological creation. The first two verses above are dealing with creation in metaphysical terms. In the first verse, Allaah reminds human beings that He created them and all of creation ultimately from nothing, which is one of His most sublime attributes. In the second verse, He poses a rhetorical question to highlight the untenable implication of atheism, “If you deny the existence of God, then do you believe that nothingness brought you into existence?” Therefore, there is no contradiction between these two verses.
接下来的三节经文指出,所有生物,包括爬行动物和人类,都是由水创造的。这是没有人否认的生物学事实。所有生物的生理机能都以水为基础。
The next three verses state that all living creatures, including those that crawl and human beings, are created from water. This is a biological fact that no one denies. All living creatures have water-based physiologies.
接下来的经文说明,人类是由尘土和泥土创造的,并且是从大地中被造出来的。对这些经文有两种可以接受的注释。一种认为,它们指的是人类的始祖阿丹。另一种认为,它们指的是每个人的化学构成。碳、氢、氮等元素存在于大地之中。通过光合作用,这些元素转化为植物性物质,人类或直接食用它们,或食用以植物为食的动物的肉而间接获得它们。因此,一切生物的本源最终是大地,或者用另一种说法,是大地的尘土;尘土与水结合后,便称为“泥土”。
The next set of verses state that the human being was created from dust and clay and was brought forth from the earth. There are two acceptable tafseers for these verses. One is that they refer to Aadam, the ancestor of mankind. The other is that they refer to the chemical composition of every human being. The elements of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, etc. are present in the earth. Through photosynthesis these elements are transformed into vegetable matter, which human beings consume directly or by eating the flesh of animals that have consumed plants. The source of all living creatures is thus, ultimately, the earth, or, by another expression, the dust of the earth, which when combined with water is called ‘clay.’
其余经文提到的是人类受造的生理层面。"纳特法"(nutfah)一词通常指男性的精液,但从语言上讲,它也可以用来指女性的生殖液。受精卵在《古兰经》中被称为"纳特法·阿姆沙吉"(nutfah amshaaj),即"混合的液体"。在一段圣训中,"纳特法"一词明确用来指女性的液体。据传,先知ﷺ曾被问到人是由什么创造的,他回答说:
The rest of the verses refer to the biological aspects of human creation. The word nutfah is commonly used to refer to male seminal fluid, but it is also linguistically possible to use it to refer to the female reproductive fluids. The fertilized zygote is referred to in the Qur’aan as nutfah amshaaj, that is, ‘a mingled fluid’.77 In a hadeeth, the word nutfah is explicitly used to refer to the fluid of the woman. It was reported that the Prophet (r) was asked from what the human being was created, and that he replied,
“他是由男人的精液与女人的精液共同创造的。” 78
“He is created from both the nutfah of the man and the nutfah of the woman.” 78
受精之后,胚胎会附着在子宫壁上。正是在这一阶段,它在阿拉伯语中被称为“阿拉克”('alaq)。79 因此,这些经文之间并不存在任何矛盾,全赞归于真主。
After fertilization, the embryo implants itself in the uterine wall. It is at this stage that it is called an ‘alaq in Arabic.79 Therefore, there is no contradiction between any of these verses, al-hamdulillaah.
《古兰经》第四章《妇女章》第82节
63 Soorah an-Nisaa’ (4):82.
64 阿拉伯语词 thumma(ثُمَّ)是一个连词,一般表示事件的先后顺序,但有时也用于较为抽象的顺序关系。穆罕默德·阿萨德理解这里的 thumma 并非表示先后顺序,因此将其译为"和"。关于 thumma 的含义和用法,可参见 Diyaa' as-Saalik ilaa Awdah al-Masaalik 中的解释。关于它的非顺序用法,又可参见《古兰经》2:198-9 和 6:154。
64 The Arabic word is thumma. It is a conjunction which generally indicates an order of events but at other times is used for a more abstract ordering. Muhammad Asad understood it not to be ordinal here, so he translated it as ‘and.’ See Diyaa’ as-Saalik ilaa Awdah al-Masaalik for an explanation of the meanings and usage of thumma. See the Qur’aan, 2:198-9 and 6:154 for other examples of its nonordinal usage.
65 参见《新大不列颠百科全书》第16卷,第776–777页。当然,这一设想带有很强的推测性,但物质现实中确实存在一些可观察到的特征,支持该理论的大致轮廓。
65 See The New Encylopaedia Britannica, vol. 16, pp. 776-7. Of course, this scenario is highly speculative, but there are some observable features of physical reality that support the broad outlines of the theaory
《古兰经》第十九章 玛尔ヤム章(Maryam)第67节。 Wait — I should keep to the translation task: the user's text is "66 Soorah Maryam (19):67." Translating faithfully: 66 苏拉·麦尔ヤム(19):67
66 Soorah Maryam (19):67.
《古兰经》第52章《山》(Soorah at-Toor)第35节
67 Soorah at-Toor (52):35.
第二十一章 安比亚章(Al-Anbiyaa’)第30节
68 Soorah al-Ambiyaa’ (21):30.
《古兰经》第24章 光明章(An-Noor)第45节。
69 Soorah an-Noor (24):45.
第70 Soorah al-Furqaan (25):54.
70 Soorah al-Furqaan (25):54.
71 《古兰经》第15章(〈希智尔〉章)第26节。本节中的术语“萨萨勒”(salsaal)指的是“混有沙子的粘土,晒干后敲击时会发出声响”。《阿拉伯语—英语词典》第2卷,第
71 Soorah al-Hijr (15):26. The term ‘salsaal’ used in this verse means ‘clay mixed with sand, which, when dried makes a sound’ (i.e., when it is struck.). Arabic-English Lexicon, vol. 2 , p.
1711.
1711.
Surah Hud (11):61
72 Soorah Hood (11):61.
第三十章 罗马人(Ar-Room):20
73 Soorah Room (30):20.
第74章 《古兰经·黑血块章》(96:1-2)。在此语境中,"‘alaq"一词更准确的译法是"附着之物",而非"血块"。
74 Soorah al-‘Alaq (96:1-2). The word ‘‘alaq’ is more accurately translated as ‘a clinging thing’ rather than ‘a blood clot’ in this context.
《古兰经》第七十五章 盖雅麦(复活)章第37节。
75 Soorah al-Qiyaamah (75):37.
《古兰经》第16章 蜜蜂章 第4节
76 Soorah an-Nahl (16):4.
77 Sūrat al-Insān (76):2。这一表达中有一个精妙之处,曾令早期的注释者感到困惑:名词 nutfah 是单数,而修饰它的形容词 amshāj 却是复数。通常情况下,形容词在数、性和格上都应与其所修饰的名词保持一致。
77 Soorah al-Insaan (76):2. There is a wonderful subtlety in this expression that puzzled early commentators; the word nutfah is a singular noun, while amshaaj, the adjective that modifies it, is a plural. Normally, the adjective must agree with the noun it modifies in number, gender and case.
受精后的nutfah是一个单一的个体,但它的染色体一半来自父亲,一半来自母亲。"因此,从科学的角度看,amshaaj作为修饰单数nutfah的复数形容词是完全准确的,因为nutfah实际上是一个多面的单一个体。" 《古兰经与现代科学:相关性研究》,第27-9页。
The nutfah is a single entity after fertilization, but it’s chromosomes are half from the father and half from the mother. “Therefore, from the scientific point of view, amshaaj is entirely accurate as a plural adjective modifying the singular nutfah, which is really a multifaceted single entity.” The Qur’an and Modern Science: Correlation Studies, pp. 27-9.
《穆斯奈德·艾哈迈德》第4206条。该圣训的传述链中存在弱点,原因是其中有侯赛因·伊本·哈桑·法扎里(al-Husayn ibn al-Hasan al-Fazaaree),他诚实,但容易出错。(参见《塔格里卜·泰赫΄ξ布》第166页,第1317条。)圣训的这一部分得到了布哈里所载阿卜杜拉·伊本·赛拉姆(‘Abdullaah ibn Salaam)圣训的支持,该圣训提到:若女性的体液(maa’ al-mar’ah)先于男性的体液,则孩子会像母亲。(《布哈里圣训实录》第5卷,第189—190页,第275条。)
78 Musnad Ahmad, no. 4206. The isnaad has weakness in it due to the presence of al-Husayn ibn al-Hasan al-Fazaaree, who was truthful but prone to mistakes. (See Taqreeb at-Tahtheeb, p. 166, no. 1317.) This part of the hadeeth is supported by the hadeeth of ‘Abdullaah ibn Salaam reported by al-Bukhaaree which mentions that if the fluid of the woman (maa’ al-mar’ah) supersedes the fluid of the man, then the child will resemble the mother. (Sahih Al-Bukhari, vol. 5, pp. 189-90, no. 275.)