Mazalim sudi har qanday mazlumning shikoyatini ko'rib chiqish bo'yicha majburiy vakolatga ega, bu mazlumlik davlat xizmatchilari tomonidan sodir etilganmi, yoki Xalifaning Shariat hukmiga zid qarorlari, konstitutsiyadagi qonuniy matnning ma'nosi, kanondagi yoki Xalifa tomonidan qabul qilingan turli Shariat qoidalari, soliq joriy etilishi yoki boshqa biror masala bilan bog'liqmi, farqi yo'q.

The court of Mazalim has the mandatory power to look into any Madhlima, whether the Madhlima were perpetrated by government civil servants, or related to a contradiction of the Shariah by the Khalifah, the meaning of a legislative text in the constitution, the canon or the various Shariah rules adopted by the Khalifah, the imposing of a tax, or any other matter. .

Mazolimlar sudi davlat xizmatchilariga taalluqli har qanday mazlumiyat, Xalifaning Shariat qoidalarini buzishi, har qanday qonun matnining ma'nosi, konstitutsiya yoki Xalifa saylanishi doirasidagi qoidalar, har qanday soliq solinishi yoki davlatning o'z fuqarolariga zulm qilishi bilan bog'liq mazlumiyatlar, jumladan ularning mulkini zo'ravonlik bilan tortib olish, yig'ilgan mol-mulk borasidagi haddan oshish yoki xodimlar hamda armiya maoshini kamaytirish yoki to'lovini kechiktirish bilan bog'liq masalalar bo'yicha: bunday mazlumiyatlarning barchasida ishni ko'rib chiqish uchun sud majlisi o'tkazish, javobgarni chaqirish yoki da'vogar bo'lishi shart emas. Aksincha, hech kim shikoyat qilmagan taqdirda ham, u mazlumiyatni ko'rib chiqish huquqiga ega.

Judiciary of Mazalim regarding any madhlima connected to some civil servants, the Khalifah’s violation of the Shariah rules, the meaning of any legislative text, the constitution or the canons within the adoption of the Khalifah, the imposing of any tax; or related to the State’s oppression of its citizens in terms of the seizure of their properties by force, or its transgression in terms of the collected properties (from them) or reducing the salaries of the employees and the army or delaying their payment: In all of these types of madhlima there is no necessity of a judicial sitting to look into the case, to summon the defendant, or to have a plaintiff. It rather has the right to look into the madhlima even if there was no complaint by anybody. .

Shuning uchun, sudlovni ko'rish uchun sud majlisining hozir bo'lishini talab qiluvchi dalil mazolim sudiga tegishli emas. Chunki bu yerda da'vogar yo'q, da'vogarning hozir bo'lishi shart emas. Mazolim sudi hech kim da'vo qilmagan bo'lsa ham madhlimani ko'rib chiqish huquqiga ega, chunki u ishni o'rganadi va buning uchun javobgarning hozir bo'lishi shart emas. Shu sababli sud majlisi zarurligi haqidagi dalil bunga qo'llanilmaydi. Buning dalili Abu Dovud va Ahmad Abdulloh ibn Zubayrdan rivoyat qilgan hadisdir. U aytadi: "Allohning Elchisi ﷺ ikki da'vogar sudya oldida o'tirishlarini buyurdilar." Shuningdek, Nabiy ﷺ Alига (r.a.) aytgan so'zlari: "Agar ikki da'vogar sening oldingda o'tirsa..."

This is because the evidence that proves the stipulation of the presence of judiciary sitting to examine the case does not apply to the judiciary of the Mazalim. This is because it has no plaintiff, as the presence of a plaintiff is not necessary. The court of Mazalim has the right to look into a Madhlima even if nobody filed a claim because it not necessary for the plaintiff to attend, since it examines the case without the need of the attendance of the defendant, as it studies the case. Therefore, the evidence regarding the necessity of a judicial court does not apply to that. This is due to what Abu Dawud and Ahmed narrated from Abdullah bin Al-Zubair, he said: “The Messenger of Allah PBUH) ordered that‘the two disputing parties sit before the judge.’" And his (PBUH) saying to ’Ali (ra): "If the two disputing parties sat before you.”.

Shu sababli, mazolim sudi zulmni ko‘rib chiqish huquqini o‘zida saqlaydi, bu ish vaqt, joy yoki sud majlisi kabi hech qanday cheklovlarsiz, paydo bo‘lganda ko‘rib chiqiladi. Biroq, bu sudning majburlash vakolatlari borasidagi mavqei tufayli u doimo nufuz va ulug‘vorlik belgilari bilan o‘ralgan. Misr va Shom sultonlari davrida mazolim ishlari ko‘rib chiqiladigan sultonning kengashi "Adolat uyi" deb atalgan bo‘lib, unda sulton o‘z nomidan ish yuritishi uchun noiblarni tayinlagan, shuningdek, qozilar va faqihlar ham qatnashgan. Al-Maqriziy o‘zining "as-Suluk ila ma’rifat duval al-muluk" (Hukmdorlar davlatlarini bilish yo‘li) nomli kitobida, Sulton al-Molik as-Solih Ayyub adolat uyida o‘z nomidan ish yuritish uchun noiblar tayinlaganini, ular zulmni bartaraf etish uchun o‘tirib, guvohlar, qozilar va faqihlar bilan birga yig‘ilganini zikr qilgan. Demak, agar mazolim sudi ulug‘vor binoga ega bo‘lsa, bunda hech qanday zarar yo‘q, chunki bu mubohdir, ayniqsa, agar bu adolatning qudratini aks ettirsa.

Therefore, the court of Mazalim reserves the right to look into the Madhlima as it occurs without any restrictions such as time, place or court sitting. However, due to the standing of this court as far as its mandatory powers are concerned, it has always been surrounded by the elements of prestige and grandeur. At the time of the Sultans in Egypt and Al-Sham, the Council of the Sultan where the Mazalim used to be dealt with used to be known as the "House of Justice", where the Sultan used to appoint deputies to act on his behalf, and the judges and the Faqihs also used to attend. Al-Maqrizi mentioned in his book entitled al-Suluk Ila Ma’rifat Duwal Al-Muluk (The way to know the States of the kings), that the Sultan Al-Malik Al-Salih Ayub appointed deputies to act on his behalf in the house of justice, where they sat to remove the Mazalim, and to gather with the witnesses, judges and the Faqihs. Therefore, there is no harm if the court of Mazalim had a splendid house, for this would be Mubah, especially if this reflected the might of justice.