Masu ra'ayin abin duniya, masu ra'ayin dabi'a, da masu musun Allah suna da dogon tarihi na musun wanzuwar abubuwan da ba su dace da ƙayyadadden tunaninsu na wanzuwa ba. Allah ne a koyaushe a saman jerin abubuwan da suke ƙoƙarin musantawa.

Materialists, naturalists, and atheists have a long history of denying the existence of things that do not fit into their very narrow, limited conception of existence. God is always number one on their list of targets for denial.

Amma abin da jama'a ba su sani ba, kuma masu musun Allah ba sa yaɗawa, shi ne cewa falsafarsu ta dabi'a da ta abu tana bukatar musun abubuwa da yawa fiye da Allah kaɗai. Ba sa son jama'a su san wannan, domin idan haka ta faru, mutane za su farka su ga irin hoton wauta da waɗannan falsafofi ke sanya duniya a ciki.

But what the public does not realize and atheists do not publicize is that their naturalistic, materialistic philosophy requires the denial of much more than God. They do not want the public at large to be aware of this because then, the people will wake up and see what a silly picture of the world these philosophies commit one to.

Misali, tsayayyen ilimin kimiyya (strict scientific empiricism) da sababbin masu musun Allah (new atheists) ke bukata — wato ra'ayin cewa abubuwan da suke wanzuwa su ne kawai wadanda kimiyya za ta iya gani ko ganowa — yana kuma bukatar musanta wanzuwar tunani (mind), kuma babu shakka tunanin wasu mutane. Kimiyya ba ta gano tunani ba. Abin da za a iya ganowa kawai shi ne sigina na lantarki a cikin kwakwalwa, amma hakan ba daya yake da tunanin ba.

For example, the strict scientific empiricism required by new atheists — the idea that the only things that exist are those observable/detectable by science — also requires denying the existence of the mind and certainly the minds of others. Science has not detected the mind. Only electrical signals in the brain can be detected, but that is not the same thing as the mind.

Shin kun taɓa ganin tunanin wani? Kun taɓa dandana tunanin ciki na wani? Kun taɓa jin motsin zuciyarsa? A'a. Abin da kawai muke iya gani shi ne halayen waje. Tunanin cikin wasu ba ya isa ga gabobin ganewarmu. Shin hakan yana nufin mu ƙi yarda cewa wasu suna da hankali kamar namu? Idan muka yi amfani da ƙa'idojin binciken kimiyya na masu kafirci akai-akai, wannan ita ce matsayar da babu makawa za mu kai.

Have you ever seen someone else’s mind? Have you experienced their inner thoughts? Have you felt their emotions? No. All we can see is external behavior. The internal mind of others is inaccessible to our perceptual faculties. So does that mean that we disbelieve that others possess consciousness like our own? If we consistently apply the standards of scientific empiricism used by atheists, that would be the inescapable conclusion.

Yin haka ne ya sa muke ƙin ilimin kimiyya na tabbatarwa ta hanyar gwaji da kuma akidar rashin imani mai sauƙin fahimta wadda ta dogara da shi.

Doing so is preposterous. Which is why we reject scientific empiricism and the simple-minded atheism that relies on it.