8.3 Juriyar Karya ta 'Yancin Ra'ayi (Liberalism)
8.3 The Fake Tolerance of Liberalism
Ƙarar Masu Sassaucin Ra'ayi: “Ba ku da haƙuri.” Fassarar: “Ba ku jure ainihin abubuwan da ni nake jurewa ba.” Ɗaya daga cikin ma'anonin kalmar “tolerance” (haƙuri/jurewa) a harshen Ingilishi shi ne: “Matsakaicin bambancin da aka yarda da shi na wani ƙayyadadden ma'auni, musamman a girman injina ko wani ɓangare nasa.” Sassan da ake ƙera a masana'anta ba su taɓa kasancewa iri ɗaya gaba ɗaya ba. Idan masana'anta ta samar, misali, piston 100,000, babu biyu daga cikinsu da za su zama daidai da juna gaba ɗaya. Koyaushe akwai bambanci, amma wannan bambanci dole ne ya kasance cikin wani ƙayyadadden haƙuri. Idan wani piston ya wuce haƙurin, ana ɗaukarsa mara aiki kuma dole ne a jefar da shi.
The Liberal Charge: “You are not tolerant.” The Translation: “You do not tolerate the precise things that I tolerate.” One of the definitions of “tolerance” in the English language is: “An allowable amount of variation of a specified quantity, especially in the dimensions of a machine or part.” Manufactured parts are never exactly the same. If a factory produces, say, 100,000 pistons, no two pistons will be exactly equal. There is always variation but that variation has to be within a specific tolerance. If a specific piston is beyond tolerance, it is deemed dysfunctional and has to be trashed.
Masu sassaucin ra'ayi suna kwaikwayon cewa su masu haƙuri ne mara iyaka, kuma suna zargin wasu da rashin haƙuri, alhali a zahiri haƙurinsu yana da iyaka. Haƙuri mara iyaka, lallai, magana ce mai karo da kanta, wata kalma mai rikici a ma'ana. Bambancin shi ne haƙurin masu sassaucin ra'ayi a ƙarshe yana dogara ne da son rai da imani na al'ada marasa tsari, alhali haƙurin Musulunci yana dogara ne akan hikima da shiriya.
Liberals pretend to be infinitely tolerant and accuse others of being intolerant when in reality their tolerance has limits. Infinite tolerance, of course, is an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms. The difference is liberal tolerance is ultimately based on whims and haphazard cultural beliefs whereas Islamic tolerance is based on hikma and guidance.
Idan muka koma ga misalin sashen injina da aka ƙera, idan matakan haƙuri (tolerance) ba a daidaita su yadda ya kamata ba, sassan da ake samarwa za su zama marasa aiki kuma babu amfani. Haka lamarin yake ga ɗan Adam. Wani irin sauyi yana iya jurewa, amma ba kowane irin sauyi ne zai iya haifar da ɗan Adam mai aiki da lafiya ba. Kuma wa zai fi sanin lafiyar ɗan Adam, aikinsa da walwalarsa — a ma'anarsu ta gaskiya — fiye da Mahalicci kuma Mai kula da ɗan Adam?
If we go back to the example of the manufactured mechanical part, if the tolerance levels are not correctly calibrated, the resulting parts will be dysfunctional and useless. Similarly for human beings. The right kind of variation is tolerable, but not all kinds of variation can lead to a functioning, healthy human being. And who would know better about human health, function, and well-being — in the truest sense of those words — than the Creator and Maintainer of humankind?