6.5 Babu Wata Manufa Ta Zahiri Ga Hijabi
6.5 There Is No Practical Purpose For The Hijab
Mutum A: Na gama da bel ɗin mota. Ba su da amfani, kawai ɓata lokaci ne.
Person A: I am done with seat-belts. They’re a waste of time.
Mutum B: Me? Kana hauka ne?!
Person B: What? Are you crazy?!.
Mutum A: A'a, ba haka ba ne ko kadan. Sanya bel ɗin mota kawai alama ce, al'ada marar ma'ana, har wasu ma suna cewa "nuna ibada" ce don nuna wa duniya yadda kake biyayya ga dokoki na sabani da aka saukar mana daga sama. Kuma duk da cewa wasu mutane sun zaɓi yin wannan nunin — ina girmama zaɓinsu — ni na zaɓi in ƙi shi.
Person A: Not at all. Wearing a seat-belt is just symbolic, an empty ritual, some would even say a “performance of piety” to show the world how much you abide by arbitrary laws sent down to us from on high. And while some people choose to undertake that performance — and I respect their choice — I choose to forego it.
To Mutum B: To, haka ne, za a iya bayyana shi haka, amma hakan ba ya nufin bel-din kujera (seat-belt) ba shi da amfani. Suna da muhimmiyar manufa ta aiki.
Person B: Well, yeah, you can describe it like that but that doesn’t mean seat-belts are useless. They serve an important practical purpose.
Mutum A: Ha! Kamar me?
Person A: Ha! Like what?.
Mutum B: Da farko, suna kare ka daga samun rauni a hatsarin mota.
Person B: For starters, they protect you from getting hurt in a car accident.
Mutum A: Wannan abin dariya ne. Shin kun san cewa wasu mutane suna sanya bel ɗin mota, amma duk da haka suna jin rauni idan motarsu ta yi hatsari? Har ma wasu mutane suna mutuwa duk da sun sa bel ɗin mota. A fili bel ɗin mota ba shi da amfani, kuma ba ya kare mutum ko kaɗan.
Person A: That’s ridiculous. Did you know that some people wear seat-belts and still get injured when they get into a car wreck? Some people even die despite wearing a seat-belt. Clearly seat-belts are useless and do absolutely nothing to protect you.
Mutum B: …me? Kawai saboda bel ɗin mota ba ya kare ka daga kowace irin cuta ba, ba ya nufin ba shi da amfani ba.
Person B: …what? Just because a seat-belt doesn’t magically save you from any and all harm, doesn’t mean it’s useless.
Mutum A: Yi haƙuri, amma kana kuskure. Na san mutane da yawa da suka saka bel ɗin mota, amma duk da haka suka ji rauni. Wasu daga cikin waɗannan mutanen ma suna tuƙi a ƙasashen da saka bel ɗin mota ya zama ruwan dare. Kana iya yarda da hakan?
Person A: Sorry, but you’re wrong. I know plenty of people who were wearing a seatbelt and still got injured. Some of these people were even driving in countries where wearing seat-belts is very common. Can you believe that?.
Mutumin B: Kuna yin kuskure a tunani. Kawai saboda bel ɗin mota ba zai iya kare ka kashi ɗari bisa ɗari ba, hakan ba ya nufin ba ya ba da kariya kwata-kwata. Idan komai ya kasance daidai, saka bel ɗin mota yana rage yuwuwar rauni da mutuwa sosai.
Person B: You’re making a logical error. Just because a seat-belt does not and cannot protect you 100% doesn’t mean that it provides no protection at all. All else being equal, wearing the seat-belt significantly reduces the possibility of injury and death.
Mutum A: Ku daina wulakanta waɗanda ba sa sanya bel ɗin mota! Idan ina tuƙi ba tare da bel ba, sannan wani direba mai buguwa ya bugi motata, na ji rauni mai tsanani ko na mutu, laifin direban mai buguwa ne, ba nawa ba. Ku daina wannan zargin wanda aka cutar da ku mai banƙyama!
Person A: Stop shaming non-seat-belt wearers! If I am driving without a seat-belt and I get hit by a drunk driver and I get seriously injured or die, that’s the drunk driver’s fault, not mine. Stop it with your disgusting victim blaming!.
Mutum B: …me? A bayyana cewa direban da ya bugu shi ne yake da laifi, amma hakan ba shi da alaka da sanya bel din mota. Kasancewar akwai mutane marasa hankali da rashin kula a duniya ba ya rage komai daga amfanin sanya bel din mota. Haka ma, kasancewar wadannan mutane marasa kula ya sa sanya bel din mota ya kara zama dole ta fuskar aiki.
Person B: …what? Obviously the drunk driver is at fault, but that has nothing to do with wearing a seat-belt. The fact that there are crazy, irresponsible people in the world doesn’t take anything away from the practicality of wearing a seat-belt. In fact, the existence of those irresponsible people makes wearing a seat-belt all the more essential from a practical perspective.
Mutum A: Ya isa! Na gaji da bayanin bel ɗin mota! Kana ba ni tsoro!
Person A: GAH! I’m done with your seatbelt-splaining! You disgust me!.
Mutum B: …uh….
Person B: …uh….
Mutum A: Wannan wani misali ne kawai na fifikon mai ɗaure bel ɗin mota, yana yi wa waɗanda ke son yin amfani da zaɓin kansu game da abin da za su sa a lokacin tuƙi hukunci cikin girman kai. Wannan ne ainihin abin da ke damun duniya a yau.
Person A: Just another example of seat-belt wearer’s privilege, smugly judging those of us who want to exercise our free choice about what we wear while driving. This is EXACTLY what is wrong with the world today.
Mutumin B: Ba ina nufin in batar da ku ba. A zahiri, idan kun duba littafin jagorar mota (owners manual) na motarku, har masu kera motoci kansu sun ce dole ne a sa bel ɗin mota domin a kare kai daga rauni. Shin masu kera motoci ma suna yin girman kai da rashin jin ƙai?
Person B: I don’t mean to offend you. Actually, if you look in your car’s owners manual, even the car manufacturers themselves say you need to wear a seat-belt to prevent injury. Are the car manufacturers being smug and insensitive too?.
Mutum A: Wannan kawai fassarar ka ce mai son zuciya, ta wanda ke ɗaure bel ɗin mota, ga littafin jagorar mai mota. Muna buƙatar fassarar wanda ba ya ɗaure bel ɗin mota, ga littafin jagorar mai mota. Daina yin kamar kai kaɗai ne da haƙƙin fassara littafin jagorar mai mota, domin ba ka da wannan haƙƙin.
Person A: That’s just YOUR biased, seat-belt wearing interpretation of the owners manual. We need a non-seat-belt wearers interpretation of the owners manual. Stop pretending like you have EXCLUSIVE right to interpret the owners manual because you DON’T.
Mutum B: Ban ga littafin jagorar mai motar ya zama mai ruɗarwa a kan wannan batu ba.
Person B: I don’t think the owners manual is ambiguous on this.
Mutum A: ISA! Ba ka san yadda yake a kaina ba, da abin da na sha yayin tuƙi mota, don haka kana da ƙarfin hali ka gaya mini ko zan sa bel ɗin mota ko a'a. Kuma abin da ya fi ba ni haushi, kana so ka hana ni magana da littafin jagorar mota! Shin kai ma kana da mota?
Person A: THAT’S ENOUGH! You have NO idea what it is like to be me and what I have been through while driving my car, so you have a lot of NERVE telling me whether or not I should wear a seat-belt. And to make matters worse, you want to shame me into silence with the owners manual! Do you even own a car?.
Mutum B: A'a, amma ban ga yadda hakan zai canza ba….
Person B: No, but I don’t see how that changes….
Mutum A: WOW, ba ka ma mallakar mota, amma kana so ka yi mini wa'azi kan bel ɗin kujera! Ka yi wa kanka alheri ka YI SHIRU!
Person A: WOW, you’re not even a car owner but you want to lecture ME on seat-belts! Do yourself a favor and SHUT UP!.
Wannan ya kawo ƙarshen wata tattaunawa mai amfani kan hijabi da cin zarafin jima'i.
Thus concludes yet another productive discussion on hijab and sexual harassment.
I don't see a passage from the "owners manual" in your message. Please paste the English text you'd like translated into Hausa, and I'll translate it.
By the way, here is the relevant passage from our “owners manual”:
Ya Annabi, ka faɗa wa matayenka da 'ya'yanka mata da matan muminai su saukar da wani ɓangare na babbar rigarsu a kansu. Wannan ya fi dacewa da cewa za a san su kuma ba za a cutar da su ba. Kuma Allah yana ko yaushe Mai gafara, Mai jin ƙai.
“O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves [part] of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.”
Al-Ahzab [Q33:59]
Al-Ahzab [Q33:59]