Wannan bayani ne game da yadda Mu'awin yake gudanar da ayyukansa da kuma yadda Khaleefah yake dubawa da bitar ayyukan Mu'awin. An samo shi ne daga irin ayyukan da Khaleefah ke da izinin gyarawa da kuma irin ayyukan da ba ya da izinin gyarawa. Wannan saboda ayyukan Mu'awin da aka wakilta ana ɗaukarsu a matsayin ayyukan Khaleefah. Domin bayani a kan haka, ya halatta mataimakin da aka wakilta ya yi mulki da kansa, ya kuma naɗa masu mulki kamar yadda Khaleefah ke iya yi. Wannan saboda sharuɗɗan mulki an ba shi su. Haka kuma yana da hakkin bincika koke-koke ko ya wakilta wani ya yi hakan, domin sharuɗɗan koke-koke an tabbatar masa da su. Yana kuma da hakkin jagorantar Jihadi da kansa, ko ya naɗa wani ya yi hakan, domin sharuɗɗan yaƙi an tabbatar masa da su. Yana da hakkin aiwatar da umarnin da ya yanke shawara a kansu ko ya wakilta wani ya aiwatar da su a madadinsa, domin sharuɗɗan bayar da ra'ayi da gudanarwa an ba shi su.
Sai dai wannan ba yana nufin Khaleefah ba zai iya soke abin da Mu'awin ya aikata ba muddin an sanar da shi a kansa. Yana nufin dai shi yana da irin ikon Khaleefah, amma yana aiki ne a madadinsa ba tare da cin gashin kansa ba. Saboda haka, Khaleefah yana da hakkin ya saɓa wa Mu'awin ya gyara abin da aka aiwatar ko ya soke duk wani aikinsa, la'akari da cewa wannan ya shafi irin ayyukan da Khaleefah zai iya gyarawa na nasa ayyukan. Idan Mu'awin ya aiwatar da hukunci daidai ko ya kashe kuɗi a wuraren da suka dace, to ƙin amincewar Khaleefah ba zai da wani tasiri ba, kuma shawarar Mu'awin za a aiwatar da ita. Wannan saboda a ƙa'ida, shawarar Khaleefah ce da kansa, kuma a irin wannan hali shi kansa ba zai iya soke shawararsa ko ya warware abin da shi da kansa ya aiwatar ba, don haka ba zai iya soke aikin Mu'awinsa ba. Amma idan Mu'awin ya nada Wali, mai gudanarwa, kwamandan sojoji, ko duk wani wanda aka nada, ko kuma idan ya tsara dabarar tattalin arziki, shirin yaki, ko tsarin masana'antu, ko duk wani aiki makamancin haka, to Khalifa yana da izinin soke shi. Wannan saboda, duk da cewa ana ganin waɗannan a matsayin ra'ayoyin Khalifa, suna cikin rukunin hukunce-hukuncen da Khalifa yake da ikon gyarawa koda kuwa shi ne ya yi su. Saboda haka, zai iya yin irin wannan ga hukunce-hukuncen Mu'awinsa. Don haka a wannan rukuni, Khalifa yana da izinin soke ayyukan Mu'awin. Ka'ida ta asali game da wannan ita ce: Duk aikin da Khalifa yake da izinin gyarawa a kan ayyukansa, yana da hakkin ya gyara shi irin haka idan Mu'awinsa ne ya aikata shi; kuma duk aikin da Khalifa ba zai iya gyarawa a kan ayyukansa ba, ba a yarda ya gyara shi ba idan Mu'awinsa ne ya aikata shi.
This is a description of the way that the Mu’awin follows in performing his actions and of the way that the Khaleefah follows in reviewing the Mu’awin’s actions. It is derived from what sort of actions the Khaleefah is allowed to redress and what actions He is not allowed to redress. This is because the actions of the delegated Mu’awin are considered as actions of the Khaleefah. As an explanation for this, it is allowed for the delegated assistant to rule by himself and to appoint rulers as it is allowed for the Khaleefah. This is because the conditions of ruling have been conferred to him. He is also entitled to investigate complaints or to deputise someone to do so, because the conditions of complaints have been verified for him. He is also entitled to take charge of Jihad by himself, or appoint someone to do so, for the conditions of war have been verified for him. He is entitled to execute orders He has decided upon or to deputise someone to execute them on his behalf, for the conditions of voicing an opinion and management are conferred to him. However, this does not mean that the Khaleefah can’t reverse whatever the Mu’awin performed as long as He had been briefed about it. It means rather that He possesses the same powers as the Khaleefah, but He acts on his behalf and not independent of him. Therefore, the Khaleefah is entitled to disagree with the Mu’awin and redress what has been executed or reverse any of his actions, bearing in mind that this applies only to the sort of actions that the Khaleefah could redress of his own actions. If the Mu’awin had executed a rule correctly or spent funds in the right areas, then the Khaleefah’s objections would carry no weight and the Mu’awin’s decision would be executed. This is because in principle, it is the Khaleefah’s own decision and in such cases He himself could not reverse his decision or nullify what He himself had executed, hence, He could not reverse his Mu’awin’s action. However, if the Mu’awin had appointed a Wali, an administrator, an army commander or any other appointee or if He had laid down an economic strategy, a military plan or an industrial programme or any similar undertaking, then the Khaleefah is allowed to nullify it. This is because, although they are considered as being the Khaleefah’s opinions, they fall under the category of decisions that the Khaleefah is entitled to redress even when done by him. Accordingly, He could do likewise with his Mu’awin’s decisions. So in this category, it is allowed for the Khaleefah to nullify the actions of the Mu’awin. The basic rule concerning this would be as follows: Any action that the Khaleefah is allowed to redress of his own actions, He is entitled to redress in a like manner if performed by his Mu’awin; and every action the Khaleefah cannot redress of his own actions, He is not allowed to redress if performed by his Mu’awin.