Islom hukumat tizimining shakli monarxiya emas. U monarxiya shaklidagi hukumatni na ma'qullaydi va na unga o'xshaydi. Monarxiya tizimidagi hokimiyat merosiy bo'lib, o'g'illar hokimiyatni otalaridan xuddi meros qoldiqlarini olgandek meros qilib oladilar. Islom hukumat tizimida esa merosiy hokimiyat tushunchasi yo'q; aksincha, hokimiyat ummat o'z ixtiyori bilan va saylab olgan kishiga bayat (sadoqat ahdi) bergan shaxsga tegishli bo'ladi.

The shape of the Islamic ruling system is not monarchical. It neither approves of the monarchical shape of government nor does it resemble it. The ruling in the monarchical system of government is hereditary where sons inherit the authority from their fathers the same way they inherit their legacy. Whereas in the ruling system of Islam, there is no concept of hereditary ruling, rather the ruling is held by whomever the Ummah gives her pledge (of allegiance) to, willingly and selectively.

Monarxiya tizimi monarxga o‘ziga xos imtiyozlar va huquqlar beradi, uni qonundan ustun qo‘yadi va uni shaxsan hech kimga javobgar qilmaydi. U millat ramzi etib qo‘yiladi, bunda u Yevropa monarxlari kabi hukmronlik qilmay, faqat mulkka egalik qiladi; yoki u ham mulkka egalik qiladi, ham hukmronlik qiladi, hatto qoidalarning manbaiga aylanadi va Saudiya Arabistoni, Marokash va Iordaniya podshohlari kabi mamlakatni va xalqni o‘z xohishiga ko‘ra boshqaradi.

The monarchical system allows the monarch special privileges and rights exclusive to him, and places him above the law and makes him personally answerable to no one. He is made the symbol of the nation, where he owns but does not rule like the monarchs of Europe; or he owns and rules, and even becomes the source of the rules, thus running the country and the people as he wishes, like the kings of Saudi Arabia, Morocco and Jordan.

Islom tizimi esa xalifa yoki imomga hech qanday maxsus imtiyoz yoki huquq bermaydi, shuning uchun u ummatning har bir fuqarosi bilan teng tutiladi. U ummatning ramzi emas, uning mulkiga egalik qiladigan va hukmronlik qilmaydigan shaxs ham emas, xalq va davlat ishlarini o‘z xohishiga ko‘ra boshqaradigan va hukm suradigan ramz ham emas. U hokimiyat va boshqaruvda ummatning vakilidir: ummat uni tanlaydi va unga ixtiyoriy ravishda bay‘at beradi, shunda u o‘zida Allohning shar‘ini ummat ustida joriy etadi. U o‘zining barcha harakatlari, hukmlari hamda ummat ishlari va uning manfaatlarini boshqarishida ilohiy hukmlar bilan cheklangan.

The Islamic system however does not assign to the Khaleefah or the Imam any special privileges or rights, so he is treated the same as any citizen of the Ummah. He is not the symbol of the Ummah where he` owns and does not rule nor is he a symbol who rules and runs the affairs of the people and country as he pleases. He is a representative of the Ummah in ruling and power, where the Ummah selects him and gives him the pledge of allegiance willingly so as to implement on her the shar’a of Allah (swt). He is restricted in all his actions, judgements and looking after the affairs of the Ummah and her interests by the divine rules.

Islomiy boshqaruv tizimida valiahdlik ham mavjud emas. Islom merosxo'rlik orqali hokimiyatni egallashni qoralaydi va buni man etadi. Xalifa faqat ummat uni ixtiyoriy ravishda bay'at bilan tanlagandagina hokimiyatni o'z zimmasiga oladi.

There is also no crown princeship in the ruling system of Islam. Islam abhors hereditary ruling and forbids that the ruling be taken by legacy. The Khaleefah only assumes the ruling when the Ummah willingly gives him the pledge of allegiance.