说“Manaat ul-Hukm（谓语之所指）是该律例的’Illah（动因）”是错误的，因为律例的所指（Manaat）与律例的’Illah（动因）不同。事实上，所指与动因之间有很大的区别。’Illah是促使律例得以确立的因素，也就是表明立法者设立该律例之意图的东西。毫无疑问，要确定它就必须有沙里亚依据来明确指出，从而理解它确实是立法者设立该律例的意图。

It would be wrong to say that the Manaat ul-Hukm is the reason behind the Hukm (I‟llatul Hukm). This cannot be said because the subject (Manaat) of the verdict is different from the reason („Illah) of the verdict. In fact there is a big difference between the subject and the reason. The „Illah is what induces the verdict to be initiated, i.e. it is the thing that indicates the intention of the Legislator behind the verdict. This, without any doubt, requires a Shari‟ah evidence to indicate it clearly so that it is understood that it is the intention of the Legislator for initiating the verdict.

关于判断的对象（Al-Hukm al-mutaʿalliq），即判断所适用或所关联的主体，换言之，就是判断所符合的事项，而非判断的依据或其„Illah（效果原因/动因）。因此可以推出，Manaat（现实事项）是判断所附着的对象，即判断是为了处理它或解决它而提出的。若说判断是因它而提出的，从而认为它就是判断背后的„Illah，那就是不正确的。判断的Manaat，是Shari‟ah判断中非文本的一面。理解它与理解„Illah是不同的；理解„Illah，则是理解那些被用来论证该„Illah的文本。