Sekulyarizm da'vo qilganidek, raqobatlashuvchi axloqiy qarashlarni bitta huquqiy tizim doirasida yarashtirib bo'lmaydi. Misol: abort.

Contrary to what secularism claims, competing moral visions cannot be reconciled within one legal system. Example: Abortion.

Ko'pgina men bilan suhbatlashgan, o'zlarini pravoslav va "an'anaviy" musulmon deb biladigan kishilar homiladorlikdan 120 kun o'tgach, ona hayotiga xavf tug'ilmasa, homilani tushirish qotillik bilan barobar, degan fiqhiy konsensus pozitsiyasini qabul qilishadi. Lekin o'sha musulmonlarning o'zlari ayolning mutlaq "tanlash huquqini" qo'llab-quvvatlashadi. Bu qanday kelishadi?

I have talked to many Muslims who consider themselves orthodox and “traditional” believers who accept the consensus fiqh position that 120 days after conception, barring threat to the mother’s life, termination of pregnancy is tantamount to murder. But those same Muslims will support a woman’s absolute “right to choose.” How is that reconcilable?

Fiqh asoslanadi ontologik haqiqatga — ya'ni ruhning homilaga qachon puflanishiga, ya'ni homilador bo'lganidan keyin 120 kun o'tgach (boshqa fikrlarga ko'ra 40 kun o'tgach). Bu haqiqat onaning musulmon yoki kofir bo'lishiga qarab o'zgarmaydi. Musulmon bo'ladimi yoki yo'qmi, homilador bo'lganidan 120 kun o'tgach homilaning tanasiga ruh puflanadi. Bu shuni anglatadiki, ona musulmon bo'lmasa ham, 120 kundan keyingi abort hali ham nohaq jon olish, ya'ni qotillikdir. Shunday ekan, ontologik haqiqatni qabul qilgan musulmonlar qanday qilib ayolning shartsiz "tanlash huquqini" qo'llab-quvvatlashlari mumkin?

The fiqh is based on an ontological fact, namely the point at which the soul is breathed into a fetus, i.e., 120 days after conception (or 40 days according to other opinions). That fact does not vary based on whether the mother is Muslim or kafir. Whether Muslim or not, 120 days after conception, there will be a soul breathed into the fetus’ body. This means that even if the mother is non-Muslim, abortion after 120 days is still the unjust taking of a soul, i.e., murder. So how could Muslims who accept the ontological fact nonetheless support a woman’s unconditional “right to choose”?

Bu musulmonlar qotillikni qo'llab-quvvatlayapti, bu borada ikkilanishning o'zi yo'q. Qotillik esa "shaxsiy tanlov" bo'la olmaydi va "yopiq eshiklar ortida" amalga oshirilishi mumkin bo'lgan narsa emas. Bundan tashqari, hech bir islom olimi ko'p dinli, musulmonlar hukmronlik qilayotgan davlatda qotillikni taqiqlovchi shar'iy hukmning faqat musulmonlarga taalluqli ekanini va uni "ozchilik" tarkibidagi nomusulmonlarga nisbatan qo'llab bo'lmasligini aytmagan. Boshqacha aytganda, bugungi modernist musulmonlarning liberal, islomga zid siyosiy pozitsiyalarni oqlash uchun odatda ishlatadigan barcha usullari abort masalasida butunlay barbod bo'ladi. Musulmonlar ayolning shartsiz homiladorlikni tugatish huquqini qo'llab-quvvatlashining yagona yo'li — olimlarning ittifoqini va shu ittifoqni qo'llab-quvvatlovchi vahiydagi aniq dalillarni rad etishdir. Albatta, ba'zi og'ishganlar bunga hech qanday muammo ko'rmaydi. Siyosatga kelsak, musulmon rahbarlar ham vaziyatning islomiy axloqiy jihati aniq bo'lishiga qaramay, "neytral" pozitsiyani tanlagan. Faqat AQShning o'zida har yili deyarli 1 million abort hujjatlashtiriladi. "Diniy fundamentalizm" yorlig'idan qochish va diniy o'ng qanot bilan bir qatorga qo'yilib qolmaslik uchun bu musulmonlar keng tarqalgan qotillik oldida jim turishni afzal ko'radi. Ko'pincha ular minbardan islom johiliyat davridagi qiz bolalarni tiriklayin ko'mish odatini bekor qilganini shiddat bilan gapirib beradigan odamlardir. Ammo noto'g'ri va qisqa muddatli siyosiy hisob-kitoblar tufayli ular bugun atrofimizda sodir bo'layotgan qiz va o'g'il bolalarni ko'mish haqida jim turishadi. Masha Alloh, qanchalar "payg'ambarona". Qanchalar "ijtimoiy adolat"ga sadoqatli.

These Muslims are supporting murder and there are no two ways about it. Murder is also not a “personal choice” that can validly occur “behind closed doors.” Furthermore no Islamic scholar ever held that, in a multi-faith polity under Muslim rule, the Shar`i prohibition of murder only applied to Muslims and could not be enforced upon a non-Muslim “minority.” In other words, all the usual strategies modernist Muslims today use to justify supporting liberal, un-Islamic political positions spectacularly fail in the case of abortion. The only way a woman’s unconditional right to terminate pregnancy can be supported by Muslims is if they reject scholarly consensus and the clear indicants in revelation that support that consensus. Obviously some deviants have no problem with that. As far as the politics go, Muslim leaders have also opted to take a “neutral” stance despite the fact that the Islamic morality of the situation is clear. Every year, nearly 1 million abortions are documented in the US alone. In order to avoid the label of “religious fundamentalism” and being lumped in with the religious right, these Muslim prefer to stay silent in the face of rampant murder. Often, these are the same people who will wax poetic from the minbar about how Islam abolished the pre Islamic practice of burying daughters. But because of myopic, ill-informed political calculations, they stay silent about the burying of daughters AND sons happening today all around us. MashaAllah, how “prophetic.” How dedicated to “social justice.”