Men xavfsizlik kamarlaridan voz kechdim. Ular vaqtni behuda sarflash.

Person A: I am done with seat-belts. They’re a waste of time.

Person B: Nima? Sen aqldan ozdingmi?!

Person B: What? Are you crazy?!.

Yo'q, unday emas. Kamarbandni taqish shunchaki ramziy, bo'sh bir marosim, hatto ba'zilar uni "taqvodorlikni namoyish qilish" deb ham atashadi — go'yo odam yuqoridan kelgan o'zboshimcha qoidalarga qanchalik rioya qilishini dunyoga ko'rsatmoqchi bo'lgandek. Ayrimlar bu namoyishni tanlashadi va men ularning tanloviga hurmat bilan qarayman, lekin men undan voz kechishni tanlayman.

Person A: Not at all. Wearing a seat-belt is just symbolic, an empty ritual, some would even say a “performance of piety” to show the world how much you abide by arbitrary laws sent down to us from on high. And while some people choose to undertake that performance — and I respect their choice — I choose to forego it.

Person B: Xo'sh, ha, uni shunday ta'riflash mumkin, lekin bu xavfsizlik kamarlarining foydasiz ekanini anglatmaydi. Ular muhim amaliy vazifani bajaradi.

Person B: Well, yeah, you can describe it like that but that doesn’t mean seat-belts are useless. They serve an important practical purpose.

Person A: Ha! Masalan nima?

Person A: Ha! Like what?.

Person B: Avvalo, ular sizni avtomobil halokatida jarohat olishdan himoya qiladi.

Person B: For starters, they protect you from getting hurt in a car accident.

Shaxs A: Bu kulgili. Bilasizmi, ba'zi odamlar kamar taqib yursa ham, avtohalokatga uchraganda jarohat oladi. Hatto kamar taqqan holda ham ba'zilari vafot etadi. Demak, xavfsizlik kamarlari foydasiz bo'lib, sizni hech narsadan himoya qilmaydi.

Person A: That’s ridiculous. Did you know that some people wear seat-belts and still get injured when they get into a car wreck? Some people even die despite wearing a seat-belt. Clearly seat-belts are useless and do absolutely nothing to protect you.

Shaxs B: …nima? Kamar bog'ichi (xavfsizlik kamari) sizni har qanday xavfdan sehrli tarzda saqlamaydi, degani u foydasiz degani emas.

Person B: …what? Just because a seat-belt doesn’t magically save you from any and all harm, doesn’t mean it’s useless.

Person A: Kechirasiz, lekin siz xato qilyapsiz. Men kamarbog'ni taqib yurgan holda jarohat olgan ko'plab odamlarni bilaman. Ularning ba'zilari hatto kamarbog'ni taqish juda keng tarqalgan mamlakatlarda haydashgan. Buni ishonasizmi?

Person A: Sorry, but you’re wrong. I know plenty of people who were wearing a seatbelt and still got injured. Some of these people were even driving in countries where wearing seat-belts is very common. Can you believe that?.

Shaxs B: Siz mantiqiy xatoga yo'l qo'yyapsiz. Xavfsizlik kamari sizni 100% himoya qila olmaydi, lekin bu uning umuman hech qanday himoya bermasligini anglatmaydi. Boshqa sharoitlar teng bo'lganda, kamar taqish jarohat olish va o'lim ehtimolini sezilarli darajada kamaytiradi.

Person B: You’re making a logical error. Just because a seat-belt does not and cannot protect you 100% doesn’t mean that it provides no protection at all. All else being equal, wearing the seat-belt significantly reduces the possibility of injury and death.

"Person A: Non-seat-belt wearers ni uyaltirishni to'xtating! Agar men kamarsiz haydayotgan bo'lsam va mast haydovchi meni urib yuborsa va men jiddiy jarohat olsam yoki halok bo'lsam, bu mast haydovchining aybi, mening emas. Bu jirkanch qurbonni ayblashni to'xtating!"

Person A: Stop shaming non-seat-belt wearers! If I am driving without a seat-belt and I get hit by a drunk driver and I get seriously injured or die, that’s the drunk driver’s fault, not mine. Stop it with your disgusting victim blaming!.

B shaxs: …nima? Albatta, mast holda mashina haydagan haydovchi aybdor, lekin bu kamar taqish bilan hech qanday aloqasi yo‘q. Dunyoda aqldan ozgan, mas’uliyatsiz odamlar borligi kamar taqishning amaliy foydasini kamaytirmaydi. Aksincha, bunday mas’uliyatsiz odamlarning mavjudligi amaliy nuqtayi nazardan kamar taqishni yanada zarur qiladi.

Person B: …what? Obviously the drunk driver is at fault, but that has nothing to do with wearing a seat-belt. The fact that there are crazy, irresponsible people in the world doesn’t take anything away from the practicality of wearing a seat-belt. In fact, the existence of those irresponsible people makes wearing a seat-belt all the more essential from a practical perspective.

Person A: GAH! Kamariga kamar taqish haqida tushuntirishlaringdan charchadim! Sen menga jirkanch ko'rinasan!

Person A: GAH! I’m done with your seatbelt-splaining! You disgust me!.

Person B: …uh….

Person B: …uh….

Shu xil'dagi kamarbog' taqish imtiyozi — bu yana bir misol. Bizlardan, ya'ni xavfsizlik kamarini taqish yoki taqmaslik bo'yicha o'z erkin tanlovimizni amalga oshirmoqchi bo'lganlardan, o'zini ustun his qilib, mensimaydigan kamarbog' taquvchilar. Bugungi dunyoda yuz berayotgan barcha noto'g'riliklarning aynan shu bo'lishi!

Person A: Just another example of seat-belt wearer’s privilege, smugly judging those of us who want to exercise our free choice about what we wear while driving. This is EXACTLY what is wrong with the world today.

Shaxs B: Men sizni xafa qilmoqchi emasman. Aslida, mashinangizning egasi qo'llanmasiga qarasangiz, hatto avtomobil ishlab chiqaruvchilarining o'zlari ham jarohat olmaslik uchun xavfsizlik kamarini taqish kerakligini aytadi. Avtomobil ishlab chiqaruvchilari ham o'zini ortiqcha bilguvchi va sezgirlikdan yiroq bo'lib ketganmi?

Person B: I don’t mean to offend you. Actually, if you look in your car’s owners manual, even the car manufacturers themselves say you need to wear a seat-belt to prevent injury. Are the car manufacturers being smug and insensitive too?.

Shaxsiy A: Bu faqat SIZNING, kamar kamarini taqadigan odamning noto'g'ri talqini. Bizga kamar taqmaydigan odamning talqini kerak. Qo'llanmani talqin qilish huquqi faqat sizda borligini ko'rsatishni to'xtating, chunki bunday huquq sizda YO'Q.

Person A: That’s just YOUR biased, seat-belt wearing interpretation of the owners manual. We need a non-seat-belt wearers interpretation of the owners manual. Stop pretending like you have EXCLUSIVE right to interpret the owners manual because you DON’T.

Person B: Menimcha, bu borada qo'llanma noaniq emas.

Person B: I don’t think the owners manual is ambiguous on this.

SHU YERDA! Mening mashinamni haydashda nimalar boshimdan kechganini va men qanday his qilayotganimni sen hech qachon bilmaysan, shuning uchun kamarni taqish yoki taqmaslik haqida menga gapirishga qanday jur'at qilasan? Ustiga-ustak, sen meni ekspluatatsiya qo'llanmasi bilan jim qilmoqchisan! Sening o'zingda mashina bormi?

Person A: THAT’S ENOUGH! You have NO idea what it is like to be me and what I have been through while driving my car, so you have a lot of NERVE telling me whether or not I should wear a seat-belt. And to make matters worse, you want to shame me into silence with the owners manual! Do you even own a car?.

Yo'q, lekin bu qanday o'zgartiradi deb tushunmayapman....

Person B: No, but I don’t see how that changes….

Person A: VOY, siz avtomobil egasi ham emassiz-u, meni xavfsizlik kamarlari haqida o‘qitmoqchisiz! O‘zingizga yaxshilik qiling va JIM BO‘LING!

Person A: WOW, you’re not even a car owner but you want to lecture ME on seat-belts! Do yourself a favor and SHUT UP!.

Shunday qilib, hijob va jinsiy tajovuz haqidagi yana bir samarali muhokama yakunlandi.

Thus concludes yet another productive discussion on hijab and sexual harassment.

Aytmoqchimanki, bizning "egalik qo'llanmamizdagi" tegishli parchani keltiraman. (Note: that is a clarification and not part of the translation; the passage itself has not been provided yet.) Iltimos, tarjima qilinishi kerak bo'lgan matnni yuboring.

By the way, here is the relevant passage from our “owners manual”:

Al-Ahzob [Q33:59]

Al-Ahzab [Q33:59]