Q 169: Agar aytilsa: butga sajda qilish, Qur'onni masxara qilish, Payg'ambarni va dinni haqorat qilish va boshqalar — bularning barchasi amaliy kufrning turlari sifatida qaraladi. Savol shundaki: nega bu amallar kishini Islom jamoasidan chiqarib yuboradi, holbuki umuman olganda amaliy kufr bunday qilmaydi?
Q 169: If it is said: Prostrating oneself before an idol, mocking at the Qur'an, abusing the Prophet and religion, etc. all these are regarded as aspects of the practical disbelief. The question is! Why do these acts exclude one from the fold of Islam, while the practical disbelief in general does not?
A--- Shuni bilish kerakki, bu to'rt ish va shunga o'xshash ishlar amaliy kufrdan emas. Ular faqat a'zolar orqali zohiran sodir bo'lgani uchun shunday deb hisoblanadi. Lekin haqiqat shundaki, ular qalbning amallari, ya'ni...
A--- One should know that these four acts and the like are not from among the acts of practical disbelief. They are only regarded as such because they are performed by the organs as apparently noticed. But, the truth is that they do not take place unless deeds of tile heart -i.e.
niyat, ixlos, ishtiyoq va taslim bo'lish — yo'qolgan. Shu sababli ular ko'rinishda amaliy kufrga o'xshaydi, lekin aslida avval aqidaviy kufrni talab qiladi. Natijada bu ishlarni faqat yomon niyatli munofiq yoki o'jar, takabbur kishigina qila oladi. Tabuk jangidagi munofiqlarning holati ham shunga misol bo'ladi. Dastlab, {Ular kufr so'zini aytdilar va Islomni qabul qilganlaridan keyin kofir bo'ldilar hamda (Muhammad ﷺ ni o'ldirish rejasi) bo'lgan narsaga niyat qildilar, lekin unga yeta olmadilar}. (At-Tavba, 74) Lekin musulmonlar g'alaba qozonganda, ular: {Biz faqat gaplashib, hazil qilgan edik}, — dedilar. (At-Tavba, 65) Shunda Allohning kalomi keldi: {Ayt: "Allohga, Uning oyatlariga va Uning Rasuliga ﷺ masxara qilayotgan edingizmi?" Uzr so'ramang; iymon keltirganingizdan keyin kofir bo'ldingiz}. (At-Tavba, 65, 66)
intention, sincerity, passion and submission -are gone. Hence, they apparently look like practical disbelief, but they basically require the dogmatic disbelief first. Consequently, these acts can not be performed but by a malicious hypocrite or a stubborn arrogant. This explains the position of hypocrites in the Battle of Tabuk. In the beginning, {They said the word of disbelief, and they disbelieved after accepting Islam, and they resolved that (plot to murder Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him)) which they were unable to carry out}. (AtTaubah, 74) But, when Muslims got victory, they declared, {We were only talking idly and joking}. (At-Taubah, 65) Here, came Allah's Word: {Say: "Was it at Allah (the Almighty), and His Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations) and His Messenger «Peace be upon him)) that you were mocking?" Make no excuse; you disbelieved after you had believed}. (At-Taubah, 65, 66)
Nihoyat, biz "Al-Kufr Al-Asghar" (kichik kufr)ni "amaliy kufr" bilan ta'riflamadik, balki iymonni talab qilmaydigan va qalbning e'tiqodi yoki amallari bilan ziddiyatga bormaydigan mutlaq amal sifatida ta'rifladik.
Finally, we did not define [Al-Kufr Al-Asghar] Minor Disbelief with "the Practical Disbelief", but with the absolute acting that does not require faith and did not contradict with the utterance of the heart or its deeds.
200 FAQ On Muslims Belief - Shiekh Hafiz Ibn Ahmed Al Hakami
Reference: 200 FAQ On Muslims Belief - Shiekh Hafiz Ibn Ahmed Al Hakami