Inaruhusiwa kuwateua majaji na muhtasibu kwa uwezo wa jumla, ili kuhukumu katika mambo yote nchini kote. Pia inaruhusiwa kuwateua kwa uwezo maalum, ambapo ubainishaji huo unaweza kuwa wa kijiografia au kulingana na aina fulani ya mahakama. Hili linaendana na matendo ya Mtume wa Allah ﷺ, kwani alimteua 'Ali ibn Abi Talib kuwa qadhi wa Yemen, na Mu'adh ibn Jabal kuwa qadhi wa eneo fulani la Yemen; pia alimteua 'Amr ibn al-'As kuwa qadhi katika jambo moja mahsusi. Hayo ndiyo yanayohusu qadhi muhtasib na qadhi 'Aam.

It is permitted to appoint the judges and the muhtasib in a general capacity, to judge on all matters all over the country. It is also permitted to appoint him in a specific capacity, where the specification could either be geographic or according to a certain type of judiciary. This would be in accordance with the actions of the Messenger of Allah (saw), for he appointed ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib as judge over Yemen, and Mu‘adh ibn Jabal as judge over an area of Yemen; he also appointed ‘Amr ibn al-A’as as judge in one specific matter. This is as far as the qadi muhtasib and the qadi ‘Aam are concerned.

Kuhusu hakimu wa madhalimu, inaruhusiwa kumteua kwa nchi nzima au kumweka katika eneo maalum, kwa sababu Mtume wa Allah ﷺ alimteua Rashid bin Abdillah kuwa Amiri wa mahakama na madhalimu katika imara alimokuwa ameteuliwa. Kuhusu kumfungia hakimu wa madhalimu katika mambo fulani, hili ni haramu, kwa sababu Mtume wa Allah ﷺ hakufanya hivyo, na pia kwa sababu wajibu wake ni kuchunguza malalamiko ya watu na kuondoa sababu zake, hivyo utaalamu wa aina moja hauwezekani, kwa kuwa malalamiko hayawezi kugawanywa. Vilevile, mbali na kuwa yeye ni hakimu anayechunguza madhalimu, pia ni mtawala katika kuondoa sababu za madhalimu, na utawala hauwezi kugawanywa. Hivyo, mtawala hajibani katika utawala wa aina moja, yaani hawezi kufungiwa kutawala mambo fulani na kuzuiwa kutawala mambo mengine; anaweza tu kufungiwa katika eneo.

As for the judge of madhaalim, it is permitted to appoint him for the whole country or to confine him to a specific area, for the Messenger of Allah (saw) appointed Rashid ibn Abdillah as Amir of the judiciary and the madhaalim over the imara where he was appointed. As for the confining of the judge of madhaalim to certain matters, this is forbidden, for the Messenger of Allah (saw) did not do so, and because his duty would be to look into the complaints of the people and remove their causes, thus specialisation would not be feasible, for the complaints cannot be partitioned. Also, in addition to him being a judge looking into the madhaalim, he is also a ruler in removing the causes of the madhaalim, and the rule cannot be partitioned. Thus the ruler does not specialise in the rule, i.e. he cannot be confined to ruling over certain matters and be restricted from ruling over other matters, he can only be confined to an area.

Mtawala anapoteuliwa na kupewa mamlaka yanayohitajika kisheria pamoja na mamlaka ya kuchunguza mambo yote, basi haijuzu kuweka mipaka wala kugawanya majukumu yake ya utawala. Jambo hilo hilo linatumika kwa hakimu wa madhaalim, kwani uteuzi wake utakuwa wa jumla kwa upande wa mahakama. Hata hivyo, anaweza kufungwa katika eneo maalum, kama ilivyo kwa kumfunga wali katika wilaya maalum. Hilo halimaanishi kugawanya utawala wake, bali ni kubainisha wilaya yake. Na kwa vyovyote itakavyokuwa wilaya hiyo na aina yake, utawala wa wilaya hiyo hauwezi kugawanywa. Hakimu wa madhaalim pia atateuliwa kwa namna hiyo hiyo juu ya wilaya ya madhaalim, na wilaya hii ni ya jumla. Kwa hiyo, itakuwa si sahihi kugawanya upeo wa wilaya yake. Hili ni dalili kwamba haipasi kuteuliwa isipokuwa kwa uteuzi wa jumla kwa upande wa mahakama ya madhaalim.

When a ruler is appointed and he acquires the mandatory powers and the authority to look into all matters, it is forbidden to restrict and categorise his duties of rule. The same applies to the judge of madhaalim - his appointment would be general as far as the judiciary is concerned. He can, however, be confined to a specific area just as for the confinement of the wali to a special wilayah. This would not be a partition of his rule but a specification of the wilayah, and no matter where and what type of wilayah it is, the rule of that wilayah cannot be partitioned. The judge of madhaalim would be appointed similarly over the wilayah of madhaalim, and this wilayah is general, therefore it would be wrong to partition the domain of his wilayah. This serves as evidence that he should not be appointed except with a general appointment as far as the judiciary of madhaalim is concerned.