“sai dai idan rashin biyayya ga Allah ya bayyana a fili”. Duk wannan yana nuna cewa tushen Dawlah shi ne Akidar Musulunci, tun da Manzon Allah (pbuh) ya kafa mulki a kansa, ya umarci a tsananta yaki da takobi domin kiyaye shi a matsayin tushen mulki, kuma ya umarci Jihadi saboda shi. An rubuta Mataki na farko na kundin tsarin mulki bisa wadannan dalilai da aka ambata a baya. Wannan Mataki ya haramta wa Dawlah samun wani ra'ayi, imani ko ma'auni wanda ba ya fitowa daga Akidar Musulunci. Samun Akidar Musulunci a matsayin tushe na suna kawai ga Dawlah bai isa ba; a maimakon haka, wannan tushe ya kamata ya bayyana a kowane bangare da ya shafi wanzuwar Dawlah da kowane al'amari, karami ko babba. Saboda haka, haramun ne ga Dawlah ta kasance da wani ra'ayi game da rayuwa ko game da mulki sai dai idan ya fito daga Akidar Musulunci. Dawlah ba za ta amince da wani ra'ayi da ba ya fitowa daga wannan Akida ba. Don haka, ba za ta amince a karbi tsarin dimokuradiyya a cikin Dawlah ba, domin ba ya fitowa daga Akidar Musulunci, kuma domin Akidar Musulunci tana saba wa ra'ayoyin da suke fitowa daga gare ta. Haka kuma, ba za a bar ra'ayin kishin kasa ya samu wani muhalli ba ko kadan, domin ba ya fitowa daga Akidar Musulunci, kuma domin ra'ayoyin da suke fitowa daga Akidar Musulunci suna kyamarsa, suna hana shi, kuma suna bayyana hadarinsa. Haka nan, ra'ayin soyayyar kasa bai kamata ya wanzu ba, domin ba ya fitowa daga Akidar Musulunci, kuma yana saba wa ra'ayoyin da suke fitowa daga Akidar Musulunci. Bugu da kari, sassan Dawlah ba za su kasance da ma'aikatun ministoci bisa fahimtar dimokuradiyya ba, haka nan kuma ba ya kamata a samu a cikin gwamnatinta wani ra'ayi na sarauta, na masarauta ko na jamhuriya, domin wadannan ba sa fitowa daga Akidar Musulunci, kuma suna saba wa ra'ayoyin da suke fitowa daga gare ta. Bugu da ƙari, an haramta gaba ɗaya ga daidaikun mutane, ƙungiyoyi ko jam'iyyu su ɗora wa Daular Islama hisabi bisa wani abu banda Aƙidar Musulunci. Saboda haka, irin wannan hisabi da ake yi bisa wani abu banda Aƙidar Musulunci haramun ne, kuma kafa ƙungiyoyi da jam'iyyu bisa wani abu banda Aƙidar Musulunci ma haramun ne. Kasancewar Aƙidar Musulunci ita ce tushen Daula, hakan yana wajabta wa Daular kanta, da kuma wajabta wa 'yan ƙasar da take mulki. Domin rayuwarta, a matsayinta na Daula, da rayuwar duk wani al'amari da ke fitowa daga gare ta a matsayinta na Daula, da duk wani aiki da ke da alaƙa da ita a matsayinta na Daula, da duk wata dangantaka da ake kafawa da ita a matsayinta na Daula, dole ne su ginu ne a kan Aƙidar Daula, wato Aƙidar Musulunci.
“unless the disobedience to Allah is flagrant”. All of this indicates that the basis of the state is the Islamic 'Aqeedah, since the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) established the authority upon it, ordered the brandishing of the sword in order to maintain it as a basis for the authority and he also ordered Jihad for its sake. The first Article of the constitution was drafted based on the previously mentioned grounds. This Article prohibits the state from having any concept, conviction or criterion that does not emanate from the Islamic 'Aqeedah. To have the Islamic 'Aqeedah as a nominal basis for the state would not be sufficient; rather, this basis should be reflected in every aspect related to the State’s existence and in every minor or major issue. Hence, it is forbidden for the state to have any concept about life or about ruling unless it emanates from the Islamic 'Aqeedah. The state would not tolerate any concept not emanating from this 'Aqeedah. Therefore, it would not tolerate the concept of democracy to be adopted within the state because it does not emanate from the Islamic 'Aqeedah and because the Islamic Aqidah contradicts with the concepts which emanate from it. Additionally, the concept of nationalism would not be allowed to have any consideration whatsoever because it does not emanate from the Islamic 'Aqeedah and because the concepts which emanate from the Islamic 'Aqeedah abhor it, prohibit it and outline its danger. Likewise, the concept of patriotism should not have any existence, for it does not emanate from the Islamic 'Aqeedah and because it contradicts with the concepts that emanate from the Islamic 'Aqeedah. Furthermore, the apparatus of the State would not have any ministerial departments according to the democratic understanding and nor should there be in its government any imperial, monarchical or republican concepts for these do not emanate from the 'Aqeedah of Islam and they contradict with the concepts emanating from it. Furthermore, it is categorically forbidden for individuals, movements or groups to account the Islamic State on other than the basis of the Islamic 'Aqeedah. Hence, such type of accounting that is based upon other than the Islamic 'Aqeedah would be prohibited and the establishment of movements and groups on other than the basis of the Islamic 'Aqeedah would be prohibited. The fact that the Islamic 'Aqeedah acts as the basis for the State makes all of this binding upon the State itself and makes it incumbent upon the citizens over which it rules. This is since its life, in its capacity as a state, as well as the life of every matter originating from it in its capacity as a state, and every action linked to it in its capacity as a state, and every relationship established with it in its quality as a state, must have as its basis the 'Aqeedah of the State, that is the Islamic 'Aqeedah.