Labari na 16 - Tsarin Mulki na Daular Khilafah (Daftarin Farko) | Quran Course

Labari na 16 - Tsarin Mulki na Daular Khilafah (Daftarin Farko) | Quran Course

0% read · 1 min left

Tsarin Mulki na Daular Khilafah (Daftarin Farko) Bookmark

This chapter was translated automatically from English and may contain mistakes. Read the original

Show original

Labari na 16

Article 16

by Sheikh Taqiuddin An-Nabahani1 min readViewed 195 times

Tsarin mulki tsarin hadaka ne ba tsarin tarayya ba.

The system of ruling is a unitary system and not a federal system.

Tsarin mulki guda ɗaya ne kaɗai daidai ne wajen mulki, kuma babu wani tsarin da ya halatta. Wannan saboda dalilan Shari'a sun zo da shi kaɗai, sun kuma haramta duk wani tsarin dabam; an rawaito daga 'Abd Allah ɗan 'Amr ɗan Al-'As cewa ya ji Manzon Allah ﷺ yana cewa.

The only correct system for ruling is the unitary system and nothing else is acceptable. This is because the Shari’ah evidence brought it alone and prohibited anything else; it was narrated by ‘Abd Allah b. Amr b. Al-‘As that he heard the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) say.

. وَمَنْ بَايَعَ إِمَامًا فَأَعْطَاهُ صَفْقَةَ يَدِهِ وَثَمَرَةَ قَ لْبِهِ فَ لْ يُطِعْهُ إِنِ اسْتَطَاعَ، فَإِنْ جَاءَ « » آخَرُ ي نَُازِعُهُ فَاضْرِبُوا عُنُقَ الآخَرِ.

. وَمَنْ بَايَعَ إِمَامًا فَأَعْطَاهُ صَفْقَةَ يَدِهِ وَثَمَرَةَ قَ لْبِهِ فَ لْ يُطِعْهُ إِنِ اسْتَطَاعَ، فَإِنْ جَاءَ « » آخَرُ ي نَُازِعُهُ فَاضْرِبُوا عُنُقَ الآخَرِ.

"Duk wanda ya yi mubaya'a ga Halifa, to ya ba shi hannunsa da zuciyarsa cikin gaskiya (watau ya miƙa masa biyayya a zahiri da kuma a ciki). Ya yi masa biyayya gwargwadon iyawarsa. Idan wani mutum ya fito (yana mai da'awar Halifanci), yana kalubalantar ikonsa, to (Musulmi) su yanke wuyan wannan mutum." (Muslim ne ya ruwaito). Kuma Abu Sa'id Al-Khudri ya ruwaito cewa Manzon Allah ﷺ ya ce.

“Lokacin da aka yi wa halifofi biyu mubaya'a, ku kashe wanda aka yi wa mubaya'a daga baya.” (Muslim ne ya ruwaito shi). Hanyar fahimta daga waɗannan hadisai biyu ita ce: hadisi na farko yana bayyana cewa idan wani ya yi jayayya da shi game da wannan Imamanci, wato Khilafah, to wajibi ne a yaƙe shi, a kuma kashe shi idan bai janye jayayyarsa ba. Don haka hadisin ya bayyana cewa duk wanda ya yi takara da shugabancin Khalifa a cikin Khilafah dole a yaƙe shi. Wannan kuma alama ce da ke nuna haramcin raba daular, da ƙarfafa kada a yarda da rabuwarta, da hana duk wani ɓangare ya ballewa daga gare ta, ko da ta hanyar amfani da ƙarfi, don kiyaye haɗin kanta. Dangane da hadisi na biyu kuwa, yana magana ne a kan yanayin da daular ba ta da shugaba, wato Khalifa, sai shugabancin daular, wato Khilafah, aka ba mutum biyu, to sai a kashe na biyun, kuma idan aka ba fiye da mutum biyu, to ta fi ƙarfin dalili. Wannan kuma alama ce da ke nuna haramcin raba daular, wato haramcin mayar da daular ta zama jihohi da yawa, kuma wajibi ne daular ta kasance ɗaya. Saboda haka tsarin mulki a Musulunci tsarin haɗaɗɗen mulki ne (unitary system), ba tsarin tarayya ba (federal system), kuma duk wani tsarin da ba haɗaɗɗen mulki ba an haramta shi haramtawa tabbatacciya, kuma saboda wannan ne aka tsara wannan labarin.

“When oath of allegiance has been taken for two caliphs, kill the one for whom the oath was taken later.” (reported by Muslim). The angle of deduction from these two narrations is that the first narration explains that in the scenario that the Imamate, in other words, the Khilafah, is given to htto dispute with him over this Khilafah it would be obligatory to fight him and to kill him if he did not give up his contention. So the narration clarifies that whoever contends the leadership of the Khalifah in the Khilafah must be fought. And this is an allusion to indicate the prohibition of the division of the state, encouragement not to permit its division and prohibiting any separation from it even through the use of force to maintain its unity. As for the second narration, it is regarding the scenario when the state does not have a head, in other words, a Khalifah, and the leadership of the state, in other words, the Khilafah, was given to two people and so the second of them should be killed, and by greater reasoning if it was given to more than two. And this is an allusion to indicate the prohibition of the division of the state. This means the prohibition of making the state into multiple states and it being obligatory that the state is one. Consequently the system of ruling in Islam is a unitary system and not a federal system and anything other than the unitary system is conclusively prohibited, and for this reason the article was drafted.