Tsarin mulki tsarin gwamnati ne na haɗin kai ɗaya (unitary), ba tsarin tarayya ba (federal) ba.

The system of ruling is a unitary system and not a federal system.

Tsarin mulki guda ɗaya ne kaɗai tsarin mulki daidai, kuma babu wani tsarin da ya halatta sai shi. Wannan saboda dalilan Shari'a sun zo da shi shi kaɗai, sun kuma hana duk wani tsarin dabam; an ruwaito daga 'Abd Allah ɗan 'Amr ɗan Al-'As cewa ya ji Manzon Allah ﷺ yana cewa.

The only correct system for ruling is the unitary system and nothing else is acceptable. This is because the Shari’ah evidence brought it alone and prohibited anything else; it was narrated by ‘Abd Allah b. Amr b. Al-‘As that he heard the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) say.

. وَمَنْ بَايَعَ إِمَامًا فَأَعْطَاهُ صَفْقَةَ يَدِهِ وَثَمَرَةَ قَ لْبِهِ فَ لْ يُطِعْهُ إِنِ اسْتَطَاعَ، فَإِنْ جَاءَ « » آخَرُ ي نَُازِعُهُ فَاضْرِبُوا عُنُقَ الآخَرِ.

. وَمَنْ بَايَعَ إِمَامًا فَأَعْطَاهُ صَفْقَةَ يَدِهِ وَثَمَرَةَ قَ لْبِهِ فَ لْ يُطِعْهُ إِنِ اسْتَطَاعَ، فَإِنْ جَاءَ « » آخَرُ ي نَُازِعُهُ فَاضْرِبُوا عُنُقَ الآخَرِ.

"Duk wanda ya yi wa Halifa mubaya'a, to ya ba shi hannunsa da zuciyarsa cikin gaskiya (wato ya miƙa masa biyayya a zahiri da kuma a badini). Ya yi masa biyayya gwargwadon iyawarsa. Idan wani mutum ya fito yana kalubalantar ikonsa (yana neman zama Halifa), to su (Musulmi) su kashe wannan mutumin." (Muslim ne ya ruwaito). Haka kuma Abu Sa'id Al-Khudri ya ruwaito cewa Manzon Allah ﷺ ya ce,

“He who swears allegiance to a Caliph should give him the grasp of his hand and the sincerity of his heart (i. e. submit to him both outwardly as well as inwardly). He should obey him to the best of his capacity. If another man comes forward (as a claimant to Caliphate), disputing his authority, they (the Muslims) should behead the latter.” (reported by Muslim). And it is narrated by Abu Sa‘id Al-Khudri that the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) said,

. » إِذَا بُويِعَ لِخَلِيفَتَ يْنِ، فَاقْ تُ لُوا الآخَرَ مِنْ هُمَا «.

. » إِذَا بُويِعَ لِخَلِيفَتَ يْنِ، فَاقْ تُ لُوا الآخَرَ مِنْ هُمَا «.

"Idan aka yi wa halifofi biyu mubaya'a, to a kashe wanda aka yi wa mubaya'ar daga baya." (Muslim ne ya ruwaito shi). Mahangar fahimta daga wadannan hadisai biyu ita ce: hadisin farko yana bayyana cewa idan wani yana kalubalantar Imamanci, wato Khilafah, ya yi takara da shi a kan wannan Khilafah, to wajibi ne a yaki shi, a kuma kashe shi idan bai janye takararsa ba. Don haka hadisin yana bayyana cewa duk wanda ya kalubalanci shugabancin Khalifa a cikin Khilafah dole ne a yake shi. Wannan kuma alama ce da ke nuna haramcin rarraba kasa, da karfafa gwiwar kada a yarda da rarrabuwarta, da hana duk wani ballewa daga cikinta ko da ta hanyar amfani da karfi domin kiyaye hadin kanta. Hadisin na biyu kuwa yana magana ne a kan halin da kasa ba ta da shugaba, wato Khalifa, sannan aka ba shugabancin kasar, wato Khilafah, ga mutane biyu, sai a kashe na biyun a cikinsu; kuma ta hanyar hujja mafi karfi, idan aka ba shi ga fiye da mutum biyu. Wannan ma alama ce da ke nuna haramcin rarraba kasa. Wato haramcin mayar da kasa jihohi da dama, kuma wajibi ne kasar ta zama daya. Saboda haka tsarin mulki a Musulunci tsarin hadaka ne (unitary) ba tsarin tarayya ba, kuma duk abin da ba tsarin hadaka ba ya haramta haramci bayyananne, kuma saboda haka aka tsara wannan labarin.

“When oath of allegiance has been taken for two caliphs, kill the one for whom the oath was taken later.” (reported by Muslim). The angle of deduction from these two narrations is that the first narration explains that in the scenario that the Imamate, in other words, the Khilafah, is given to htto dispute with him over this Khilafah it would be obligatory to fight him and to kill him if he did not give up his contention. So the narration clarifies that whoever contends the leadership of the Khalifah in the Khilafah must be fought. And this is an allusion to indicate the prohibition of the division of the state, encouragement not to permit its division and prohibiting any separation from it even through the use of force to maintain its unity. As for the second narration, it is regarding the scenario when the state does not have a head, in other words, a Khalifah, and the leadership of the state, in other words, the Khilafah, was given to two people and so the second of them should be killed, and by greater reasoning if it was given to more than two. And this is an allusion to indicate the prohibition of the division of the state. This means the prohibition of making the state into multiple states and it being obligatory that the state is one. Consequently the system of ruling in Islam is a unitary system and not a federal system and anything other than the unitary system is conclusively prohibited, and for this reason the article was drafted.