Kafiri mwenye uhasama (al-kafir al-harbi) ni kila kafiri ambaye hajaingia katika dhima ya Waislamu, awe alikuwa chini ya mkataba (mu'ahad) au chini ya dhamana ya usalama (musta'man), au asiwe mu'ahad wala musta'man. Iwapo mkataba utafungwa kati ya Dola ya Kiislamu na dola yoyote ya kikafiri, raia wa dola hiyo ni watu wa mkataba (mu'ahadun) wanaoshughulikiwa kulingana na yale yaliyomo katika mkataba baina yao na sisi, na kila kilichomo ndani yake kinatekelezwa. Hata hivyo, licha ya kuwepo kwa mkataba, makafiri wa mkataba hawatolewi katika kuwa makafiri wenye uhasama kihukumu, kwa sababu kufungwa tu kwa mkataba au kuvunjwa kwake na wao au sisi kunarudisha hukumu yao kwenye hukumu ya makafiri wengine wenye uhasama. Kwa sababu hiyo, kuwauzia silaha na vifaa vya vita kunazuiwa iwapo kuna ndani yake kuwaimarisha dhidi ya Waislamu. Lakini iwapo kuwauzia silaha au vifaa vya vita hakuwaimarishi dhidi ya Waislamu, basi kuwauzia hakuzuiliwi, hasa iwapo Dola ya Kiislamu itakuwa mtengenezaji wa silaha na kuziuza kama dola kubwa za leo zinavyofanya. Ikiwa mkataba utataja kuruhusiwa kuwauzia silaha na vifaa vya vita, sharti hilo halitekelezwi iwapo linawaimarisha dhidi ya Waislamu, kwa kuwa linapingana na Shari'a, na sharti zote zinazopingana na Shari'a ni batili na hazifungwi.

The belligerent disbeliever is any disbeliever who has not entered in the pledge (dhimmah) of the Muslims, whether he was under a covenant or under security (must’amin) or was neither a mu’ahid nor a musta’min. If a treaty is contracted between the Islamic State and any kafir State, the citizens of this State are covenanted persons who are dealt with according to what is stated in the treaty that is between them and us, and all that is included in this is executed. Nevertheless, despite the existence of the treaty the covenanted disbelievers are not excluded from being belligerent disbelievers in the rule (hukman) because the mere conclusion of the treaty or its nullification by them or us returns their rule to the rule of the rest of the belligerent disbelievers. Due to this, selling them weapons and war materials is prevented if there is therein a strengthening for them against Muslims; however, if selling them weapons or war materials is not strengthening them against Muslims then their sale to them is not prevented particularly if the Islamic State becomes a manufacturer of weapons and sells like the great States today. If the treaty mentions the permissibility of selling them weapons and war materials, this condition is not fulfilled if it strengthens them against Muslims as it contradicts the Shar’a, and all conditions contradicting the Shar’a are void and not contracted.

Kwa upande wa wale ambao hakuna mkataba kati yao na sisi, wao ni makafiri wenye uhasama kwa hakika, iwe wako katika vita vya moja kwa moja na dola ya Kiislamu au la. Hawaruhusiwi kuingia katika ardhi ya Waislamu isipokuwa kwa dhamana maalum kila mara, na hawaruhusiwi kuishi katika ardhi ya Waislamu isipokuwa kwa muda maalum na mdogo. Hata hivyo, tofauti kati ya dola ya makafiri wenye uhasama inayopigana nayo kivitendo na dola ya makafiri wenye uhasama isiyopigwa vita kivitendo ni kwamba, kwa dola inayopigwa vita kivitendo, hakuna mkataba unaofungwa nayo kabla ya makubaliano ya amani, na dhamana haitolewi kwa raia yeyote wake isipokuwa akija kusikiliza maneno ya Allah, au akija kuwa dhimmi anayeishi katika ardhi ya Waislamu. Hii ni kinyume na dola ya makafiri wenye uhasama isiyopigwa vita kivitendo, ambapo mikataba ya kibiashara, ya ujirani mwema na mingineyo hufungwa nayo, na raia wake hupewa dhamana ya kuingia katika ardhi ya Kiislamu kwa ajili ya biashara, burudani, utalii au mengineyo.

As for where there is no treaty between them and us, they are belligerent disbelievers in reality whether they are at an active war with the Islamic state or no. They are not enabled to enter the Muslim land except by a specific security (for) each time and they are not enabled to reside in the Muslim land except for a specific and limited period. However, the difference between a belligerent disbeliever State which is fought in practice and a belligerent disbeliever State not being fought in practice is that with the belligerent disbeliever State fought in practice no treaty is contracted with her before the peace agreement and security is not given to any of its citizens except if he comes to listen to the speech of Allah or if he comes to become a dhimmi living in the Muslim land. This is contrary to the belligerent Disbeliever State not fought in practice as commercial, good neighbourliness and other treaties are contracted with her, and her citizens are given a security to enter the Islamic land for trade, recreation, tourism or other than that.