Whoever rents immovable property for residence, then he himself may reside therein, and he may accommodate anyone else he wishes therein if he stands in his place, because he can execute that which is contracted over by himself or his representative. Whoever resides therein is his representative in executing what was contracted upon, so it is permitted, just as if he appointed an attorney in taking possession of the sold thing. He may make in the house what is customary for the resident, such as flooring, furniture, goods, etc. Except that the tenant may not accommodate in the house which he rented anyone because of whom wear and tear could be greater than his own wear and tear upon the house. So he should not accommodate therein one who would damage the house, such as washers or blacksmiths, if the tenant is not a washer or blacksmith, because that is harmful to it, and it is more harmful than the benefit upon which the contract occurred. The contract occurred upon the benefit which is well known, or this house, even if by mutual acquaintance, so it is not permitted for him to take a benefit greater than the benefit over which the rent contract occurred.

Whoever rents immovable property for residence, then he himself can reside therein and he can accommodate anyone else he wants therein if he stands in his place because he can execute that which is contracted over by himself or his representative. Whoever resides therein is his representative in executing what was contracted upon so it is permitted just as if he delegated an attorney in taking possession of the sold thing. He can build in the house of what is the custom of the resident of flooring, furniture, goods etc. Except that the tenant cannot accommodate in the house which he rented because of which wear and tear could be greater than his own wear and tear upon the house. So he should not accommodate therein one who would damage the house such as washers or blacksmiths if the tenant is not a washer or blacksmith because that is harmful to it, which is more harmful than the benefit upon which contract occur over. The contract occurred upon the benefit which is well known or this house even if by mutual acquaintance, so it is not permitted for him to take a benefit greater than the benefit over which the rent contract occurred.

Si lazima katika kukodisha nyumba kwa ajili ya makazi kutaja waziwazi makazi yenyewe. Badala yake inaruhusiwa kufanya mkataba usio na masharti bila ya kulazimika kutaja makazi wala maelezo yake, kwa sababu nyumba haikodishwi isipokuwa kwa ajili ya makazi, hivyo hakuna haja ya kuyataja. Na kwa sababu tofauti ya makazi ni ndogo, haihitaji kuandikwa. Hivyo anaweza kumkodishia mwingine nyumba hiyo kwa muda wa kukodi kwake (mwenyewe). Ikiwa kukodisha kunafanyika kila mwezi kwa kitu kinachojulikana, si haki kwa yeyote kati yao kukibatilisha isipokuwa baada ya kupita kila mwezi. Isipokuwa kwamba mwezi wa kwanza unahitaji kulipwa kodi yake kutokana na asili isiyo na masharti ya mkataba, kwa sababu inajulikana kuwa inafuata mkataba, na ni ujira unaojulikana. Mwezi wowote utakaofuata unalazimishwa na mkataba kwa kuingia ndani yake, yaani kuishi katika nyumba hiyo. Mara akishaingia ndani yake, kuingia huko kunakuwa kumethibitika, hivyo mkataba wa kwanza ni sahihi. Ikiwa hakuingia au mkataba utabatilishwa mwishoni mwa mwezi wa kwanza, basi unabatilika. Kila mwezi ambao hakuna kuingia ndani yake, kukodi hakujathibiti humo kwa kukosekana kwa mkataba. Na akisema, "Nimekukodishia nyumba yangu kwa miezi ishirini kwa kiasi hiki kwa kila mwezi," jambo hilo linaruhusiwa kwa sababu muda unajulikana na ujira wake unajulikana. Haifai kwa yeyote kati yao kubatilisha mkataba katika hali yoyote kwa sababu ni kipindi kimoja. Ikiwa mtu amekodi nyumba kwa kipindi cha mwaka mmoja, kisha ikaonekana kwake kuubatilisha kabla ya kupita mwaka huo, kodi yote inamlazimu. Ikiwa mtu amekodisha nyumba yake, ni wajibu wa mwenye nyumba kukamilisha kila kitu kitakachowezesha mpangaji kunufaika, kama vile kukabidhi funguo za nyumba, kuweka lami bafuni, kurekebisha milango, kuhakikisha maji yanapita, na kila kinachohitajika ili kuifanya nyumba iweze kutumika au kuwezesha kunufaika nayo. Kwa upande wa mambo yanayotimiza manufaa kama kupeleka vitu vinavyohamishika, kamba, ndoo, mita ya umeme, mita ya maji, hayo yako juu ya mpangaji. Kwa upande wa mambo yanayolazimu kupamba na kuweka mapambo, hakuna wajibu wa kuyafanya kwa yeyote kati yao, kwa sababu kunufaika kunawezekana bila hayo. Kwa upande wa kupaka nyumba chokaa, kufanya sinki na bafu kuwa jeupe kwa dawa ya kuua rangi, ikiwa hilo linahitajika wakati wa kupangisha, basi ni juu ya mwenye nyumba, kwa kuwa hilo ni miongoni mwa mambo yanayowezesha kunufaika. Na ikiwa nyumba imechafuliwa kwa sababu ya kitendo cha mpangaji, basi ni juu yake kuisafisha. Kwa upande wa kusafirisha takataka, hilo ni juu ya mpangaji. Ikiwa mwenye nyumba ataweka sharti kwa mpangaji katika mkataba wa kupangisha kwamba alipe gharama za yale ambayo Shari'a imemlazimisha nayo katika mambo yanayowezesha kunufaika, sharti hilo ni batili kwa kuwa linapingana na lazima ya mkataba. Vivyo hivyo, ikiwa mpangaji atamwekea mwenye nyumba sharti la kulipa gharama zinazomlazimu mpangaji, sharti hilo ni batili kwa kuwa linapingana na lazima ya mkataba. Ikiwa mwenye nyumba na mpangaji watakufa, au mmoja wao, upangishaji unabaki katika hali yake, kwa kuwa upangishaji ni mkataba wa lazima ambao hauvunjwi kwa kifo wakati kile kilichokubaliwa bado kipo.