Masharti ya mikataba (shurūṭ al-ʿuqūd) imejumuishwa katika masharti ya kisheria ya Shari'ah, kama vile masharti ya mauzo, ushirika, na waqf (wakfu), na mengineyo, lakini hayafanani na masharti ya hukumu za kuhamisha (al-aḥkām al-tanjīziyya) na hukumu za kimazingira (al-aḥkām al-ḥaqīqiyya) kuhusu hitaji la dalili ya kisheria inayoonyesha sharti ili lichukuliwe kuwa sharti. Lakini kwa masharti haya ya mikataba inashurutishwa tu kwamba yasipingane na Shari'ah. Yaani, masharti ya hukumu za kuhamisha au za kimazingira yanahitaji dalili ya kisheria ili yachukuliwe kuwa masharti, tofauti na masharti ya mikataba, ambayo hayahitaji kuwa katika dalili ya kisheria. Ni halali kwa pande mbili za mkataba kuweka masharti wanayotaka, lakini si halali kwao au kwa mmoja wao kuweka masharti yanayopingana na maandiko ya kisheria. Basi masharti ya mkataba lazima yasipingane na Shari'ah, na si sharti yatokane na dalili ya kisheria. Hii ni kwa kauli ya Mtume ﷺ: "… ni nini kinawapata baadhi ya watu, wanaweka masharti yasiyomo katika Kitabu cha Allah. Sharti lolote lisilomo katika Kitabu cha Allah ni batili, hata likiwa ni sharti mia moja; hukumu ya Allah ni yenye haki zaidi, na sharti la Allah ni lenye kufunga zaidi," amepokea Al-Bukhari. Na maana ya "lisilomo katika Kitabu cha Allah" ni lenye kupingana na yale yaliyomo katika Kitabu cha Allah, yaani si katika hukumu Yake wala si kulingana na amri Yake. Hiyo ni kwa sababu Mtume ﷺ ameruhusu kuweka masharti bila vizuizi, na amebainisha kwamba kila kinachopingana na hukumu ya Allah Ta'ala ni batili, basi hakukataza kuweka masharti, na kwa kuwa amekanusha (kwamba maana ni) kuzingatiwa kwa kilichomo ndani ya Kitabu cha Allah (cha masharti), basi maana yake ni kukanusha kuzingatiwa kwa kinachopingana na Kitabu cha Allah.
The agreements shurout are included in the shari'ahi shurout, like the shurout of the sale, the partnership, the entailment (waqf), and the like, but they are not like the assignment verdicts and circumstantial verdicts shurout (conditions) with regard to the need of a shari'ahi evidence that shows the shart to make it considered as a shart, but it is conditional for these shurout that they don’t contradict the shari'ah. Which means that, the shurout of the assignment or circumstantial verdicts need a shari'ahi evidence to be considered as shurout, contrary to the agreements shurout, they don’t need to be included in the shari'ahi daleel, but it is permissible for the two parties of the agreement to set the shurout they want, however it is not permissible for them or any of them to set shurout which contradict the shari'ahi text. So the agreement shurout must not contradict the shari'ah and it is not conditional for them to come through a shari'ahi daleel, that is for the saying of the Messenger of Allah (SAW) : “… what is the matter with some men, they set conditions that are not in the book of Allah, what so ever of a condition that is not in the book of Allah; is invalid (baatel), even if it is a hundred shart, the decree of Allah is greater in the right, and the condition of Allah is more binding”, narrated by Al-Bukhari. And the meaning of “not in the book of Allah” is contrary to what is in the book of Allah, means it is not in His ruling nor is it in accordance with His decree; that is because the Messenger of Allah (SAW) has permitted the setting of the shurout (conditions) without restrictions, and clarified that whatever contradicts the hukm of Allah Ta’ala is baatel (invalid), so He did not forbid the setting of the shurout, and since He (SAW) negated (that the meaning is) the consideration of what is from within the book of Allah (of shurout), then the meaning of it is negating the consideration of what contradicts the book of Allah.