Huquq sohasi texnik atamalar, qonunlardagi bo‘shliqlar va "eski do‘stlar aloqalari" bilan shunchalik to‘lib-toshganki, o‘z da’vosini mustaqil ravishda muvaffaqiyatli taqdim etish imkoniyati deyarli nolga teng. Shu sababli sizga advokat yoki huquqshunos sizning nomingizdan ish yuritishi zarur. Biroq, afsuski, bunday xizmatni olish sizga pul sarflashni talab qiladi — juda ko‘p pul. Qancha ko‘p pul sarflashga tayyor bo‘lsangiz, shuncha yaxshi advokatni sotib olishingiz mumkin.

With the legal world being so full of technical jargon, loopholes in the law and ‘old boy networks’, your chances of successfully presenting your claims on your own are practically zero. Thus, you need a barrister or solicitor to act on your behalf. But, to your expense, to attain the services of one will cost you money...a lot of money. And the more money you have to spend, the better the lawyer you can buy.

Agar sizda qo‘shimcha pulingiz bo‘lmasa-yu, uyingizni o‘g‘irlagan jinoyatchi noqonuniy yo‘l bilan topgan daromadiga eng yaxshi huquqshunoslik xizmatini sotib olgan bo‘lsa-chi? Bu sohada tez orada shuni bilib olasizki, ish bo‘yicha dalillar hukmni belgilovchi omil emas, balki advokat o‘ziga topshirilgan natijaga erishish uchun foydalanadigan turli vositalardan faqat bittasi xolos. Ko‘rinishidan, adolat uning ustuvorliklari ro‘yxatida unchalik yuqori turmaydi! Xulosa shu: o‘z qonuniy huquqlaringizga erishish yo‘lida... pul gapiradi!

So what if you don’t have more money to spare, and the criminal who robbed your house has used all the earnings from his illicit endeavours to buy the best that the legal profession has to offer? In this industry you will learn very quickly that the evidence in a case is not the deciding factor of the verdict, but it is only one of a variety of the tools that the lawyer makes use of in achieving the outcome he has been paid to produce. It seems that justice does not figure highly on his list of priorities! The bottom line is this. In the quest for getting your legitimate rights....money talks!.

Sizning ishingiz bo'yicha hukmni chiqarish masalasi tasodifan tanlangan o'n ikki nafar oddiy fuqaro — sudlovchilar hay'atiga topshirilgan. Dalillar ularga taqdim etiladi (advokatingiz qancha pul olganiga qarab, ular chiroyli yoki chiroyli bo'lmagan tarzda bayon etiladi), va ular buni o'zlarining shaxsiy fikrlariga ko'ra tortib ko'radilar. Biroq quyidagi nuqtalarni e'tiborga oling:

With regards to the question of deciding the verdict in your case, this is left up to twelve randomly selected members of the general public - the jury. The evidence is presented to them (eloquently or not depending on how much your lawyer cost), and they weigh it up according to their own opinions. But consider these points:

Agar ko'chada 12 kishi bilan uchrashsangiz, ulardan nechtasiga ishonar edingiz? Axir, sudya hay'atining a'zolarining o'zlari ham jinoyatchi, irqchi, jinsiy kamsituvchi, yolg'onchi, aldamchi bo'lishi mumkin-ku...

If you came across 12 people in the street, how many of them would you trust? After all, the jury members themselves may be criminals, racist, sexist, liars, cheats...

Hakamlar huquqiy jarayonning tafsilotlari, sud-tibbiyot fani yoki politsiya tartib-qoidalarining murakkabliklari haqida, ehtimol, hech narsa bilmaydilar. Shunga qaramay, ular dalillarni aynan shu asoslar bo‘yicha baholashlari kerak!

The jury probably know nothing about the details of legal process, the science of forensics or the intricacies of police procedures. Yet they have to judge the evidence according to these bases!.

Barcha narsalarni hisobga olsak, Britaniya sud tizimi haqidagi ba'zi faktlarni inobatga olganda, unga ishonchingiz yo'qligi hech kimni hayratga solmaydimi?

All in all, given some of these facts about the British judicial system, is it any surprise that you don’t have confidence in it?