Hakuna kikomo cha idadi ya majaji wanaoweza kuteuliwa kwa Mahakama ya Matendo ya Dhulma (Madhalim); badala yake, Khalifah anaweza kuteua majaji wengi kadiri anavyoona inafaa ili kuondoa matendo ya dhulma (madhalim), idadi yoyote ile itakayokuwa. Ingawa inaruhusiwa kwa zaidi ya jaji mmoja kuketi katika kikao cha mahakama, ni jaji mmoja tu ndiye mwenye mamlaka ya kutoa hukumu. Majaji wengine hutoa msaada na ushauri tu, na ushauri wao hauna nguvu ya kulazimisha.

There is no limit to the number of judges that can be appointed for the Court of Injustice Acts (Madhalim), rather the Khalifah can appoint as many as he may deem necessary to eradicate the Madhalim (injustice acts), whatever that number may be. Although it is permitted for more than one judge to sit in a court session, only one judge has the authority to pronounce a verdict. The other judges only assist and provide advice, and their advice is not binding.

Ushahidi wa kwamba hakimu wa Mahakama ya Madhalim (Mahakama ya Dhulma) anaweza kuwa zaidi ya mmoja ni kwamba Khalifah anaruhusiwa kuteua naibu mmoja au zaidi kutenda kwa niaba yake. Hata hivyo, ikiwa kuna idadi ya mahakimu wa Mahakama ya Madhalim, mamlaka yao ya kuchunguza madhalim (dhulma) hayawezi kugawanywa, hivyo kila mmoja wao angekuwa na haki ya kuchunguza kesi za madhalim (dhulma). Khalifah hata hivyo anaruhusiwa kumteua hakimu wa Mahakama ya Madhalim katika mkoa mmoja, au kumteua kwa aina fulani ya kesi, kwa sababu ana haki ya kutoa uongozi wa jumla juu ya madhalim (dhulma) au uongozi maalum ikiwa atapenda. Anaweza kutoa uongozi juu ya Dola nzima, au juu ya mji au eneo, kadri anavyoona inafaa.

The evidence that the judge of the Court of Injustices (Madhalim) can be more than one is that the Khalifah is permitted to appoint one or more deputies to act on his behalf. However, if there are a number of judges of the Court of Injustices (Madhalim), their power to look into the injustices (Madhalim) cannot be divided, so each one of them would have the right to look into the cases of injustices (Madhalim). The Khalifah is however allowed to specify a judge for the Court of Injustices (Madhalim) in one province, or to specify him to a certain type of case, because he has the right to give a general governorship over the injustices (Madhalim) or a specific governorship if he wished. He can give a governorship over the whole of the State, or over a city or region, as he sees fit.

Kuhusu jambo kwamba hakimu wa Mahakama ya Madhalimu anapoangalia kesi anapaswa kuiangalia peke yake, hii ni kwa sababu ya yaliyotajwa awali kuhusu katazo la kuwa na mahakimu wengi katika kesi moja, ilhali inaruhusiwa kuwa na zaidi ya hakimu mmoja katika eneo moja. Hata hivyo, inaruhusiwa kwa mahakimu wengine wa Mahakama ya Madhalimu kukaa naye mahakamani kwa ushauri tu, nao hawatashiriki katika hukumu. Hili linategemea ridhaa yake na uchaguzi wake. Kwa hiyo, ikiwa hakupendelea hilo na akapinga wao kukaa naye, basi hawatakaa, kwa kuwa hakuna mtu anayemvuruga hakimu katika kuangalia kazi yake anayepaswa kukaa naye. Lakini ikiwa aliondoka katika kikao cha mahakama, basi amshauri nao katika jambo hilo.

As for the fact that when the judge of the Court of Injustices (Madhalim) looks into a case he should look into it on his own, this is because of what was mentioned earlier regarding the prohibition of having numerous judges in a single case, while it is permitted to have more than one judge in the same area. However, it is permitted for other judges of the Court of Injustices (Madhalim) to sit with him in court in a consultative capacity only, and they would not participate in the verdict. This is referred to his contentment and choice – so if he did not prefer that and opposed their sitting with him then they would not do so, since no one who distracts the judge from looking into his work should sit with him. However, if he left the court session he should consult them in the issue.