Ibara ya 92
Article 92
Mahakama ya Matendo ya Dhulma (Madhalim) haifungwi na kikao cha mahakama, wala na ombi la mshtakiwa, wala na uwepo wa mlalamikaji. Ina mamlaka ya kuchunguza kesi yoyote ya dhulma hata kama hakuna mlalamikaji.
The judiciary of the Injustice Acts (Madhalim) is not restricted by a court session or the request of the defendant or the presence of the plaintiff. It has the authority to look into any case of injustice even if there is no plaintiff.
Dalili yake ni ushahidi unaothibitisha kuwa masharti ya kikao sahihi cha kusikiliza kesi hayatumiki kwa Mahakama ya Madhalim kwa sababu ya kutokuwepo kwa mdai, kwa kuwa hakuna sharti la uwepo wa mdai, kwani itasikiliza dhulma (Madhlamah) hata kama hakuna aliyekuwa mdai. Pia, hakuna haja ya mshtakiwa kuwepo, kwa sababu mahakama inasikiliza kesi bila kuhitaji mshtakiwa kuwepo, kwani inachunguza kwa makini dhulma (Madhlamah) na mshtakiwa. Kwa hiyo, ushahidi unaofanya kikao cha mahakama kuwa sharti ni maneno ya Mtume ﷺ.
Its proof is the evidence which confirms the conditions for the correct session to look into a case does not apply to the Court of Injustices (Madhalim) due to the absence of a plaintiff, since there is no requirement for the presence of a plaintiff, as it will look into the injustice (Madhlamah) even if no one was a plaintiff. Also, the lack of necessity for the defendant to be present, because the court looks into the case without requiring the defendant to be present since it is looking closely at the injustice (Madhlamah) and the defendant. Therefore, the evidence which makes the court session a condition - which is the words of the Messenger (pbuh).