Baadhi ya 'Ulamaa wamezigawanya katika aina tatu tu: Sabab, Sharti na Maani'. Wengine wameziweka katika aina nne, wakiongeza Sihhah, Butlaan na Fasaad kwa zile tatu zilizotajwa hapo juu, huku wengine bado wameziweka katika aina tano, kama ilivyowasilishwa hapo juu, pamoja na kuongeza Rukhsah na 'Azeemah.
Some of the ‘Ulamaa have made them into only three types: The Sabab, Shart and Maani’. Others made them into four adding the Sihhah, Butlaan and Fasaad to the above three whilst others still have made it five types like that which is presented above with the inclusion of the Rukhsah and the ‘Azeemah.
Hii ni kwa sababu wanazuoni wa Fiqh walitofautiana kuhusu aina hizi mbili za mwisho: Al-Sihhah, Al-Butlaan na Al-Fasaad, na Al-Rukhsah na Al-‘Azeemah. Baadhi yao walizichukulia kuwa ni sehemu ya Hukm At-Takleefiy, huku wengine wakizichukulia kuwa ni sehemu ya Hukm Al-Wad’iy. Kauli iliyo karibu zaidi na usahihi ni kwamba ni sehemu ya Hukm Al-Wad’iy, kwa sababu zinaeleza sifa (Wasf) ya Hukm At-Takleefiy, lakini si aina katika zile tano zake: Al-Waajib, Al-Mandoob, Al-Haraam, Al-Makrooh na Al-Mubaah. Kwa hiyo tunaposema, kwa mfano, kwamba mkataba fulani ni Saheeh, Baatil au Faasid, hiyo ni maelezo (Wasf) ya Hukm At-Takleefiy, si Hukm At-Takleefiy yenyewe, kwa sababu Hukm At-Takleefiy kwa mkataba huo linaweza kuwa Waajib, Haraam, Mandoob au jingine tofauti na hayo.
That is because the Fuqahaa differed in respect to these last two types: The Sihhah, Butlaan and Fasaad, and the Rukhsah and ‘Azeemah. Some of them considered these to be from the category of the Hukm At-Takleefiy whilst others viewed them to be from the Hukm Al-Wad’iy category. The closest to what is correct is that they are from the Hukm Al-Wad’iy because they represent a Wasf (description) of the Hukm At-Takleefiy whilst they are not a type from amongst its five types: Al-Waajib, Al-Mandoob, Al-Haraam, Al-Makrooh and Al-Mubaah. So when we say, for instance, that such and such a contract is Saheeh, Baatil or Faasid it represents a description (Wasf) for the Hukm At-Takleefiy and not a Hukm Takleefiy itself because the Hukm At-Takleefiy for the contract could be Waajib, Haraam, Mandoob or other than that.
Vivyo hivyo, tunapoeleza Hukm kwa kuzingatia kuwa ni Rukhsah au 'Azeemah, maelezo haya si Hukm At-Takleefiy, yaani wajibu, mapendekezo, makatazo, kuchukiza na ruhusa. Kwa mfano, Saumu ya Ramadhani ni Waajib (ya lazima), lakini pia ni 'Azeemah, ilhali kufungua saumu anayofanya mgonjwa katika Ramadhani ni Mubaah na ni Rukhsah (ruhusa). Kwa hiyo, maelezo ya Rukhsah au 'Azeemah yanawakilisha maelezo ya Hukm At-Takleefiy na si maelezo ya Kishari'a kuhusu kitendo chenyewe cha Insaan (mtu).
Similarly, when we describe the Hukm in respect to it being a Rukhsah or an ‘Azeemah, this description is not the Hukm At-Takleefiy i.e. obligation, recommendation, prohibition, dislike or and permissibility. So for example, the Sawm (fasting) of Ramadhaan is Waajib (obligatory) but it is also an ‘Azeemah whilst the breaking of fast undertaken by the sick person in Ramadhaan is Mubaah and it is a Rukhsah (permission). Therefore, the description of the Rukhsah or ‘Azeemah represents a description of the Hukm At-Takleefiy and not a Shar’iy description for the action of the Insaan (person) (itself).
Kwa sababu hiyo, kila moja ya Sihhah, Butlaan na Fasaad pamoja na Rukhsah na 'Azeemah huchukuliwa kuwa ni hukmu miongoni mwa aina za Hukm Al-Wad'iy, na hazichukuliwi kuwa miongoni mwa aina za Hukm At-Takleefiy. Kwa msingi huo, aina za Hukm Al-Wad'iy ni tano: As-Sabab, Ash-Shart, Al-Maani, As-Sihhah, Al-Butlaan na Al-Fasaad, na Ar-Rukhsah na Al-'Azeemah. Ifuatayo ni maelezo ya kila moja ya aina hizi:
For that reason, each of the Sihhah, Butlaan and Fasaad in addition to the Rukhsah and the ‘Azeemah are considered to represent a Hukm from amongst the types of the Hukm Al-Wad’iy and are not considered to be from the types of the Hukm At-Takleefiy. Based on that the kinds of the Hukm Al-Wad’iy number five: As-Sabab. Ash-Shart, Al-Maani, As-Sihhah, Al-Butlaan and Al-Fasaad, and Ar-Rukhsah and Al-‘Azeemah. The following is an explanation of each of these kinds: