Imom Molik ibn Anas (rh) bu fikrda yolg‘iz edi va Kitob hamda Sunnatda topilmagan har bir hukm uchun u Madina ahlining ijmoini qabul qilardi.

– Imaam Al-Maalik Bin Anas (rh) was alone in holding this opinion and he took the Ijmaa’ of Ahl-ul-Madinah for every Hukm not found in the Kitaab and the Sunnah.

Malikning keyingi izdoshlari esa Madina ahlining ijmoi hujjat (dalil) hisoblanishiga kelishib oldilar.

– As for the followers of Maalik who came after him then they agreed that the Ijmaa’ of Ahl ul-Madinah represents a Hujjah (proof)

…bu masalalarda, ya'ni faqat Payg'ambar ﷺ dan kelgan tavqif orqali ma'lum bo'ladigan masalalarda. Ra'y yo'l qo'yiladigan masalalarga kelsak, bu borada ular ixtilof qilganlar. Ya'ni ko'pchilik, Madina ahlining ijmo'i hujjat bo'lmaydi, deb aytgan.

in the matters that are not known except by way of Tawqeef from the Messenger (saw). As for the matters in which there is room for opinion then they differed in respect to that. That is whilst the majority have said that the Ijmaa’ of Ahl ulMadinah does not represent a Hujjah.