1 – Mujtahidga mazhablar ichidagi rukhsalarga ergashish joiz emas, chunki u o‘zi to‘g‘ri deb biladigan qarashni tanlab olishga qodir. U o‘zi eng ehtimolli deb hisoblagan (Ghalab ‘Alaa Zhannihi) to‘g‘ri qarashga ergashishi shart, boshqasiga ergashishi esa joiz emas. Bu, avval zikr qilganimiz, ijtihodning o‘zgarishi bilan bog‘liq aniq holatlar va masalalardan mustasno.

1 – It is not permitted for the Mujtahid to follow the Rukhas within the Madhaahib and that is because he is capable of outweighing the opinion that he views to be correct. He is bound to follow that which he believes most likely (Ghalab ‘Alaa Zhannihi) to be the Sawaab (correct view) whilst it is not permissible for him to follow other than that. That is with the exception of the specific circumstances or cases that we have previously mentioned in relation to the changing of the Ijtihaad.

2 – Agar muqallid bo‘lgan mutabbi’ (ergashuvchi), ya’ni dalili bilan birga hukmni qabul qilgan kishining amali biror masalaning hukmiga bog‘langan bo‘lsa, ya’ni u amalni aniq bir hukm asosida bajargan bo‘lsa, unga bu hukmni tark etishi joiz emas, faqat shar’iy tarjih bo‘lgandagina mumkin, masalan dalilning kuchliligi yoki mujtahidning ilmi darajasi bilan.

2 – If the action of the Al-Muqallid Al-Mutabbi’u, who adopts the Hukm alongside its Daleel, has connected to a Hukm of a Mas’alah i.e. he has undertaken the action based upon a specific Hukm, it is not permissible for him to leave this Hukm except through a Shar’iy outweighing, like through the strength of the evidence or the level of the knowledge of the Mujtahid.

3 – Agar taqlid qiluvchi oddiy kishi (al-muqallid al-ʼaammiy), dalilini bilmagan holda hukmni qabul qilgan bo‘lsa va shu hukm bo‘yicha amal qilgan bo‘lsa, u holda bu mas’alaning ichida boshqa hukmga o‘tish unga joiz emas, ikkinchi hukm taklif (shar’iy mas’uliyat) jihatidan yengilroq bo‘lsa ham, og‘irroq bo‘lsa ham. Amal qilishidan oldin, so‘ragan hukmi haqida esa, bir mas’ala doirasida oldiga qo‘yilgan shar’iy hukmlardan o‘zi xohlagan hukmni tanlashi unga mumkin.

3 – If the action of the Muqallid Al-‘Aammiy, who adopts the Hukm without its Daleel, has connected to a Hukm of a Mas’alah, it is not permitted for him to leave this Hukm for a different one within the same Mas’alah, whether the second Hukm was lighter or heavier in respect to the Takleef (legal responsibility). As for before his acting upon the Hukm, that he has enquired about, then it is for him to choose from the Ahkaam Ash-Shar’iyah presented before him within a single Mas’alah (issue), the Hukm that he wants to.

Shunday ekan, mukallafning o‘z harakati bog‘liq bo‘lgan hukmni tark etib, shu harakat uchun boshqa hukmni qabul qilishi ijtihodni o‘zgartirish mavzusida biz zikr qilgan holatlar yoki sharoitlardan tashqari, joiz emas. Biz Allohdan Haqqqa sobit turishni va to‘g‘ri qarashni qabul qilishni so‘raymiz.

Therefore, the Mukallaf leaving the Hukm that his action has been connected to, to adopt another Hukm for the same action, is not permitted except in the cases or circumstances that we have mentioned in the subject area of changing the Ijtihaad. And we ask Allah Ta’Aalaa for perseverance upon the Haqq and the adoption of the correct view.