Qonunchilik maqsadida sonni cheklash "hasr" (cheklash) uchun emas, balki misol keltirish uchun qilingan. Shu sababli, ma'nosi va oqibati jihatidan ulardan tashqari, halokatli itoatsizlik amallari sanalgan boshqa amallar ham mavjud. Hadisda davom etib shunday deyilgan: Allohga shirk keltirish, sehr-jodu, Alloh taolo haqli ravishda (ya'ni qonuniy asosda) bo'lmagan holda taqiqlagan jonni o'ldirish, yetim mol-mulkini yeyish, foiz yeyish, jangga chiqish kuni orqaga qaytish (jangdan qochish) va g'ofil mo'min ayollarga zino isnodini qo'yish. Biroq hadisda zino, gomoseksual amallar, josuslik yoki itoatsizlik va halokatli gunohlarning (mubiqot) boshqa amallari zikr qilinmagan.
The legislative intention by restricting the number is not for the purpose of ‘Hasr (limitation) but rather it is for demonstration. Consequentky, there are other acts, which share with them in their meaning and their effect in terms of being destructive acts of disobedience. So the Hadeeth goes on to mention: Shirk in Allah, magic, killing the life that Allah has prohibited except by right (i.e. legitimately), the devouring of the orphan’s wealth, eating of interest, turning back on the day of the march (to battle) and accusing unaware believing women (of fornication). It did not however mention Zinaa, homosexual acts, spying or other actions which are also from the acts of disobedience and destructive sins (Moobiqaat).
Shunga ko'ra, bu hadisdagi 'adad (son) uchun mafhum muxolafa yo'q, chunki hukm son bilan cheklangan yoki chegaralangan emas.
Consequently, the ‘Adad (number) in this Hadeeth does not have a Mafhoom Mukhaalafah attached to it because the Hukm is not restricted or limited to the number.
"Adad" (son) ga mafhum mukhalafah bo'lishi uchun ikki shart zarur:
For the ‘Adad (number) to have a Mafhoom Mukhaalafah two conditions are necessary:
Birinchisi: hukm ma'lum bir son bilan cheklangan bo'lishi (yoki shunga tegishli bo'lishi).
Firstly: That the Hukm is restricted by (or to) a number.
Ikkinchidan: Nutqning siyoqi (mazmuni/kontekst) bu sondan boshqasiga hukmning inkor etilishini ko'rsatadi.
Secondly: That the Siyaaq (framing/context) of the speech indicates the negation of the Hukm for other than that number.