授权助手（Tafwid）的条件之一是，其授权需涵盖两个方面：第一是全面的职责，第二是代理。因此，哈里发必须对他说“我以我的名义任命你为我的代理人”，或使用其他含义相同、涵盖全面职责与代理的措辞。这一授权使哈里发能够派遣助手前往特定地点，或根据需要将其调往其他地方并安排其他工作，作为哈里发的助手，而无需重新授权，因为这一切都属于最初的授权范围之内。

It is a condition for the empowering of a delegated assistant (Tafwid), that his empowerment encompasses two issues: The first being general responsibility, and the second being the representation. Accordingly, it is necessary for the Khalifah to say to him “I appoint you on my behalf as my deputy” or anything that is of a similar meaning from the wordings that encompass the general responsibility and representation. This authorisation enables the Khalifah to send the assistants to specific locations, or transfer them to other places and other work as is required as the assistant of the Khalifah, and without the need for a new authorisation since it all falls under the original empowerment.

这一论断的证据，在于助理大臣（辅臣）的实际情况。所谓“授权辅臣”（وزير التفويض，或称 مساعد التفويض），即哈里发任命的、与其共同承担统治与权威之责的大臣。他被授权依照自己的见解处理事务，依照自己的伊智提哈德，在符合伊斯兰教法规定的前提下进行管理，因此哈里发赋予他全面的处理权和代理权。这里的“代理”是一种契约，而契约只有以明确的言辞缔结才是有效的。因此，规定授予助理权力时，必须使用表明其为哈里发代理人、并拥有全面管理权的措辞，这一条件是有依据的。 例如，哈里发说：“我将我所担负的职责授予你，代我行事”，或者说：“我任命你为大臣，并决定由你代理”，或类似的话语。也就是说，只要以任何方式能理解出全面代理和全面管理的含义，就足够了。因此，授予助理权力必须使用表明其实质为哈里发代理人的言辞，并让他承接哈里发所拥有的一切职权。换言之，辅臣的任命契约必须包含两个条件：第一是全面管理，第二是代理。如果言辞未明确涵盖这两个条件，那么对该助理的大臣任命便不成立。

The evidence for this is the reality of the work of the assistant, since the minister of Tafwid, or the assistant of Tafwid, who is the minister that the Khalifah appointed to carry the responsibility of ruling and authority with him. He is authorised to manage the affairs according to his opinion, and to conduct them according to his Ijtihad in agreement with the Shari’ah rules, and so the Khalifah empowers him with a general handling and representation. The representation here is a contract, and contracts are not correct unless they are contracted with a direct word, and so for this reason, it has been made a condition that empowering an assistant must occur with wording that indicates he is a representative in the place of the Khalifah and has the general control. Such as if the Khalifah said to him “I granted you what is upon me, to act on my behalf”, or says, “I made you a minister, and decided upon your representation” or something similar. In other words, it should encompass the general representation and general control by any manner it is understood, so it is imperative that the empowerment of the assistant is upon words that indicate the reality of the assistant, which is the representative of the Khalifah, and takes everything in terms of mandatory powers which the Khalifah has. In other words, it is imperative that the contract of ministry with the assistant is upon a wording which encompasses two conditions: the first being general control, the second being representation, and if the wording does not explicitly cover these two conditions, then the ministry for the assistant is not contracted.

虽然他被授予了全权代理和总体管理的权力，但哈里发仍可将其限定于某一特定事务或某一地点、某一特定时间段，而在另一时间、另一地点则派他处理其他事务。两位长老（穆斯林和布哈里）均有关于此的记载，由艾卜·胡莱赖传述。

Though he is empowered with representation and general control, it is permitted for the Khalifah to use him in a specific action or place at a period of time, and for other work or another place at another time. The two sheikhs (Muslim and Al-Bukhari) reported from Abu Hurayrah.

. » عُمَرَ عَلَى الصَّدَقَةِ بَ عَثَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ «.

. » عُمَرَ عَلَى الصَّدَقَةِ بَ عَثَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ «.

“安拉的使者ﷺ派遣欧麦尔去征收萨达卡（天课）。”由安-奈萨仪和阿德-达拉密记录。

“The Messenger of Allah (pbuh) sent Umar to collect Sadaqah (Zakah)”. Al-Nasa’i and Al-Darami reported.

. » حِينَ رَجَعَ مِنْ عُمْرَةِ الْجِعْرَانَةِ ب عََثَ أَبَا بَكْرٍ عَ لَى الْحَجِّ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ « .

. » حِينَ رَجَعَ مِنْ عُمْرَةِ الْجِعْرَانَةِ ب عََثَ أَبَا بَكْرٍ عَ لَى الْحَجِّ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ « .

“当先知（phuh）从‘Umra返回后，他派Abu Bakr（ra）主持朝觐（Hajj）。”换言之，Abu Bakr（ra）与’Umar（ra）——两人曾是Messenger of Allah（pbuh）的两位大臣——只是在特定事务上被委以全面的管理权，而并非在先知（pbuh）在世时的所有事务上如此。尽管他们作为受授权的辅佐者，依据授权之职（Wizara’ Al-Tafwid）的推断，拥有全面的管理权与代表权。’Ali（ra）与’Uthman（ra）在’Umar（ra）在位期间也是如此。甚至在Abu Bakr（ra）在位期间，他的辅佐者’Umar（ra）也十分明显地行使全面的管理权与代表权，以至于一些Companions会对Abu Bakr（ra）说：我们不知道究竟是’Umar（ra）还是您是哈里发。尽管如此，Abu Bakr（ra）在某些时期仍让’Umar（ra）负责司法事务，这已由Al-Bayhaqi以一条经Al-Hafiz加强的传述链记载。

“When the Prophet (phuh) returned from ’Umra, he sent Abu Bakr for the Hajj”. In other words, Abu Bakr (ra) and Umar (ra) – who were the two ministers for the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) , were charged with general control over specific actions, and not in all the actions at the time of the Messenger (pbuh) , despite that they were assistants authorised with general control and representation as inferred from the ministry of authorisation (Wizara’ Al-Tafwid). ’Ali (ra) and ’Uthman (ra) did the same at the time of Umar (ra). And even during the time of Abu Bakr (ra) when his assistant Umar (ra) was very apparent in exercising general control and representation, to the point that some of the companions would say to Abu Bakr (ra) that we don’t know whether Umar (ra) or you is the Khalifah, despite that Abu Bakr (ra) would make Umar (ra) responsible for the judiciary in some periods, as has been reported by Al-Bayhaqi with a chain that was strengthened by Al- Hafiz.

从先知（愿主赐福他并使他平安）的传记以及他之后的正统哈里发的事迹中可知，助手被授权进行总体的管理与代表，但哈里发可以在某一特定地点或某一特定事务上寻求助手的协助，正如先知（愿主赐福他并使他平安）与艾布·伯克尔（愿主喜悦他）、欧麦尔（愿主喜悦他）的做法，以及艾布·伯克尔（愿主喜悦他）与欧麦尔（愿主喜悦他）的做法一样。这好比委派一位助手负责北方的各省事务，另一位负责南方的各省事务，并且允许将前者调到后者的职位上，反之亦然，也允许将这位调去做某人的工作，把另一位调去做别的工作，只要这样做是协助哈里发所必需的。这些都不需要新的授权，而是在这种情况下，将他从一项事务调到另一项事务以提供协助是有效的，因为他最初已被授予总体管理与代表的权力，因此所有这些事务都属于他作为助手的授权范围之内。这就是助手与总督之间的区别：总督被授权在某一地区行使总体管辖权，因此不能被调离该地区，而若要调任，则需要新的授权，因为新的地点不属于其最初的授权范围。然而，被授予总体管理与代表权的助手，可以从一个地方的协助工作调到另一个地方，而无需新的授权，因为他最初便已被授予在一切事务上进行总体管理与代表的权力。

From the Sirah of the Messenger (pbuh) and the righteous Khulafaa’ after him, it is understood that the assistant is authorised in the general control and representation, but it is permitted for the Khalifah to seek the help of the assistant in a particular place or action, just as the Prophet (phuh) did with Abu Bakr (ra) and Umar (ra), and as Abu Bakr (ra) did with Umar (ra). This is like charging an assistant to pursue the northern governorships, and another with the southern ones, and it is permitted to use the first one in the place of the second and vice versa, and to move this one to the work of such and such person, and the other to another work according to what was necessitated to assist the Khalifah. None of this requires a new authorisation, rather it is valid in this case to move him from one action to another to assist, since he was originally authorised with general control and representation, and so all of these actions are part of his authorisation as an assistant. This is a difference between the assistant and the governor, since the governor is empowered with the general control in an area, and so he is not moved from it, rather he requires a new empowerment, since the new place is not part of the original authorisation/empowerment. However, an assistant who is empowered with the general control and representation can be moved from assistance in one place to another place without needing a new empowerment, since he was originally empowered with general control and representation in all actions.