Ilova V - Qur'on soyasida | Quran Course

Ilova V - Qur'on soyasida | Quran Course

Uchinchi: Bahs qilinadigan mavzulardan biri sizning mavzuyingiz: Sayyid Qutb Vahdat al-Vujudga e'tiqod qilgan. Darhaqiqat, Sayyid Qutb, Alloh unga rahm qilsin, Hadid surasi va Ixlos surasini tafsir qilishda adabiy uslubdan foydalanib, aniq bo'lmagan gaplar aytgan (bu o'quvchini uning Vahdat al-Vujudga e'tiqod qilganiga ishontirishi mumkin edi), shunga asoslanib unga Vahdat al-Vujudga e'tiqod qilgan degan ayblov qo'yilgan. Siz yaxshi ish qildingiz, Baqara surasini tafsir qilishda uning so'zlarini keltirib, Vahdat al-Vujud g'oyasini aniq rad etganini ko'rsatdingiz. Ushbu iqtiboslardan (Sayyid Qutb yozgan): "Va bu yerdan biz haqiqiy islomiy mafkurada Vahdat al-Vujud deb ataladigan g'oya yo'qligini topamiz." Bundan tashqari, uning "Muqavvimat at-Tasavvur al-Islomiy" kitobida Vahdat al-Vujudga e'tiqod qiluvchilarga aniq javob bor. Shuning uchun biz aytamizki, Alloh Sayyid Qutbni o'zining adabiy uslubi bilan kengaytirgan bu noaniq gaplari uchun kechirsin; noaniq gap esa uning aniq va ravshan so'zlarini yengib o'tmaydi.

Third: One of the provocative topics is your topic: Sayyid Qutb believes in Wahdat Al- Wujood. Verily, Sayyid Qutb, may Allah have mercy on him, said something not clear (that might make the reader think that he believes in Wahdat Al-Wujood) using the style (of literature) in commenting on Surat Al-Hadeed, and Surat Al-Ekhlaas, and based upon it the accusation that he believes in Wahdat Al-Wujood was made. You did something good when you quoted his saying in commenting on Surat Al-Baqarah, and his (Sayyid Qutb) clear rejection to the idea of Wahdat Al-Wujood. From these quotes (Sayyid Qutb wrote): “and from here we find that there is nothing in the true Islamic ideology called the idea of Wahdat Al-Wujood.” To add, in his (Qutb) book: "Muqawwimat At-Tasawwur Al- Islami” there is a clear response to those who belief in Wahdat Al-Wujood. Therefore, we say may Allah forgive Sayyid Qutb for these vague statements that he expanded upon using his literal style; and what is vague does not overcome the clear cut statements from his saying.

Garchi qo'l yozuvlarida farqlar bo'lsa-da, umumiy bir yo'nalish bor. Bu kitobda bezovta qiluvchi uslub, doimiy g'azab, jumlalarga bir zumda sakrab o'tib, katta xatolarga olib keladigan, boshqacha isbotlanish ehtimoli bor joylarda ham shoshilib xulosa chiqarish, aniq jumlalarni tashlab, noaniq jumlalarga tayanish kuzatiladi. Bu esa hech qanday bahsni qabul qilmaydigan qat'iy qoidani buzishdir. Bunday ish tanqid usuli bo'lgan "Al-Haydah al-Ilmiyah" manhajiga xiyonat (buzish) hisoblanadi. Adabiy uslub jihatidan olib qaraydigan bo'lsak, uni Sayyid Qutbning uslubi bilan solishtirganda, bu uslub pastroq darajadagi uslubdir. Sayyid Qutbning uslubi esa yuksak. Agar buni sizning (Rabi'ning) uslubingiz deb hisoblasak, u juda oddiy bo'lib chiqadi va katta darajalarga ega bo'lgan ilm talabasiga mos kelmaydi. Shuning uchun tilning ta'siri, tildan foydalanish qobiliyati va masalani aniq bayon etish bilan bayon go'zalligi o'rtasida muvozanat bo'lishi kerak; aks holda qalam sindirilsin, ya'ni bunday yozishga urinmasin.

Even though there are differences in the handwritings, there is a common trend, This book has the common trend of the disturbing manner, the continuous anger, the same jump on the sentence to generate huge mistakes, rushing into conclusions where there is a possibility to prove otherwise, and depending on the vague sentences and leaving the clear ones, which is a solid rule that do not accept any argument about it....This is considered as betraying (violating) the Manhaj of criticism (named): Al’Haydah Al’Elmiyah. Regarding the style of literature, if we were to compare it with the style of Sayyid Qutb, then this style is of descending style. The style of Sayyid (Qutb) is high. If we considered it as your (Rabee’s) style, then it is very elementary, and does not suit a student of knowledge who has great degrees. So there should be a balance between the literal taste, the ability of using the language and clearly presenting the matter, and the beauty of presenting; or otherwise the pen should be broken ( i.e. otherwise do not bother writing it).

Bu kitob zavq bag'ishlaydigan oltita jihatga ega edi, lekin ular uni zavqsiz qilib qo'ydi. Mana, siz so'ragan narsaga nisbatan ko'rganim shu. Javobimni kech yozganim uchun uzr so'rayman, lekin men bu odamning (Sayyid Qutbning) kitoblarini o'qimas edim, garchi u xalq orasida mashhur bo'lsa ham. Biroq siz aytgan xavfli fikrlar meni uning kitoblarini ko'p o'qishga undadi va men uning kitoblarida ko'p yaxshi narsalarni topdim: buyuk iymon, aniq haqiqat, Islomning dushmanlari rejalarini fosh etish, shuningdek mazmunida ayrim xatolar va men uning aytmaganini afzal ko'rardim bo'lgan ba'zi so'zlar. U bu narsalarning ko'pini boshqa joylarda bekor qiladi, mukammal bo'lish esa qiyin. Bu odam buyuk yozuvchi va buyuk tanqidchi edi, keyin u buyuk Qur'on, sharafli Sunnat va go'zal Sirat orqali Islomga xizmat qilishga yuz tutdi. Bu uning o'z davri masalalariga bo'lgan munosabatini shakllantirdi. U Alloh uchun o'z munosabatida (qilayotgan ishini davom ettirish uchun) qat'iy turdi. U o'tmishidagi masalalarni ham oydinlashtirdi. Undan kechirim so'zlarini yozish so'ralganida, u o'zining sadoqatli va mashhur so'zini aytdi: "Shahodat uchun ko'targan barmog'im bilan Tavhidga qarshi biror narsa yozmayman..." yoki bunga yaqin so'z.

These are six aspects that this book enjoys, which made it not enjoyable. This is what I see regarding what you requested. I apologize for being late to respond to you, but I used not to read the books of this man (Sayyid Qutb), even though it is popular amongst the people. However, the dangerous remarks that you talked about made me do lots of readings into his books, and I found in his books many good things, a great faith, clear truth, exposing the plans of the enemies of Islam, and some mistakes in the contents and saying some things that I wish he never said. He nullifies lots of these things in other places, and to be perfect is hard. This man was a great writer and a great criticizer, and then he moved towards serving Islam through the great Quran, the noble Sunnah, and the beautiful Seerah. This shaped his attitude regarding the issues of his time. He insisted on his attitude (to continue what he is doing) for the sake of Allah. He also clarified the issues about his past. It was requested from him to write some words of apology, and he said his faithful and famous word, that "I will not use the finger which I raise for shahadah (i.e. calling to Tawheed) to write something against Tawheed..." or a word close to this.