Agar mu'avin biror masalani amalga oshirgan bo'lsa va xalifa unga uni shunday bajarishni buyurgan bo'lsa, u holda uni xalifa buyurganidek, hech qanday qo'shimcha yoki kamaytirishsiz amalga oshirishi kerak. Agar xalifa mu'avinning allaqachon bajarilgan ishiga qarshi chiqib qaytsa, u holda masala ko'rib chiqiladi: agar bu mu'avin to'g'ri ijro etgan hukm yoki mablag'ni o'z o'rniga sarflagan bo'lsa, u holda mu'avinning fikri amalga oshiriladi, chunki u asosan xalifaning fikridir va xalifa o'zi amalga oshirgan hukmlar va sarflagan mablag'ni bekor qila olmaydi. Agar mu'avin bajargan ish boshqa narsada bo'lsa, masalan, hokim tayinlash yoki qo'shin tayyorlashda bo'lsa, u holda xalifaning mu'avinga qarshi chiqishi joizdir, xalifaning fikri amalga oshiriladi va mu'avinning harakatlari bekor qilinadi, chunki xalifa o'z ishini tuzatish huquqiga ega, shuning uchun mu'avinning harakatlarini ham tuzatishi mumkin.

If the assistant conducted an issue, and the Khalifah ordered him to do it, then he must implement it as the Khalifah ordered him to do so, without any addition or deletion. If the Khalifah returned to oppose the assistant rejecting what he has already executed, then the matter is examined; if it was a rule that he had implemented properly, or wealth that he placed in of its right place, then the opinion of the assistant is implemented, since it is in origin the opinion of the Khalifah, and the Khalifah cannot revoke what he himself had implemented of rules and spent of wealth. If what the assistant had executed was in anything else, such as appointing a governor or preparation of an army, then it is permitted for the Khalifah to oppose the assistant, and the opinion of the Khalifah is implemented, and the actions of the assistant are cancelled because the Khalifah has the right to redress his own action so he may redress the actions of the assistant.

Ushbu maqola yordamchining o'z ishini qanday olib borishi va xalifa yordamchining harakatlarini qanday tekshirishi haqida, hamda xalifa qaysi harakatlarni bekor qilishi mumkin va qaysilarini bekor qilishi mumkin emasligi haqida bayon qiladi, chunki yordamchining harakati xalifaning harakati hisoblanadi. Buning sababi shuki, yordamchiga xalifa kabi mustaqil hukm chiqarish ruxsat etiladi, chunki hukm chiqarish shartlari unda mavjud deb hisoblanadi. Unga mazolim (zulmlar) ustida ko'rib chiqish va boshqalarni buning uchun tayinlash ruxsat etiladi, chunki mazolim shartlari unda mavjud deb hisoblanadi. Unga jihodni o'zi olib borish va uni amalga oshiradiganlarga vakolat berish ruxsat etiladi, chunki urush shartlari unda mavjud deb hisoblanadi. Unga ishlarni amalga oshirishni shaxsan o'z zimmasiga olish yoki boshqasini tayinlash ruxsat etiladi, chunki fikr yuritish va ishlarni boshqarish shartlari unda mavjud deb hisoblanadi. Biroq, bu xalifaning yordamchi amalga oshirgan har qanday ishni, hisobot unga yetkazilgan ekan, bekor qilishi to'g'ri emas degani emas. Aksincha, bu yordamchida xalifaga xos bo'lgan majburiy vakolatlar mavjudligini anglatadi, lekin bu xalifa nomidan, uning mustaqil ravishda emas, balki unga qarab amalga oshiriladi.

This article is a description of how the assistant carries out his work, and how the Khalifah scrutinises the actions of the assistant, and this is taken from what is permitted for the Khalifah to reverse, and what is not permitted for him to reverse from the actions, since the action of the assistant is considered to be the action of the Khalifah. The explanation for this is that the assistant is permitted to rule independently, as is the Khalifah, since the conditions for ruling are considered in him, and it is permitted for him to look into the Madhalim (injustices) and to appoint others to look into them, since the condition for the Madhalim are considered in him, and he is permitted to undertake the Jihad by himself and to empower those who will undertake it, since the conditions of war are considered in him, and he is permitted to undertake the implementation of the issues personally or to appoint someone else to implement them since the conditions of opinion and management of affairs are considered in him. However, this does not mean that it is not correct for the Khalifah to cancel whatever the assistant carries out as long as the report has been raised to him, rather what it means is that he possesses what the Khalifah does in terms of mandatory powers, but this is on behalf of the Khalifah and not independent of him.

Shunga ko'ra, Xalifa yordamchisini uning qilgan ishini rad etish va amalga oshirilgan narsani bekor qilish orqali qarshi chiqishi joiz, ammo bu Xalifa o'zi qilgan bo'lsa, bekor qilishi joiz bo'lgan chegaralar doirasida bo'lishi kerak. Shuning uchun, agar yordamchi biror qoidani to'g'ri tarzda joriy etgan bo'lsa yoki mol-mulkni zarurat talab qilgan joyga bergan bo'lsa, keyin Xalifa kelib, uni amalga oshirilgandan so'ng shu masalada yordamchiga qarshi chiqsa, uning qarshiligining qiymati yo'q; aksincha, yordamchining ishi amalga oshiriladi, Xalifaning fikri va qarshiligi esa rad etiladi, chunki asli bu uning fikri bo'lsa-da, bunga o'xshash masalalarda o'z fikrini qaytarishi yoki tugallangan har qanday amalga oshirishni bekor qilishi to'g'ri emas. Demak, bunday masalalarda uning yordamchisining ishini bekor qilishi to'g'ri emas. Agar yordamchi hokimni, ma'muriy xodimni, Armiya qo'mondonini yoki boshqa biror lavozimni vakolatli qilgan bo'lsa, yoki iqtisodiy masalalarni, harbiy rejalarni, sanoatlashtirish rejalarini yoki shunga o'xshash narsalarni yo'lga qo'ygan bo'lsa, Xalifa uni bekor qilishi joiz. Bunga sabab, bu Xalifaning fikri hisoblanadi, lekin u o'zi amalga oshirgan bo'lsa, qaytarishi joiz bo'lgan masalalardandir, shuning uchun unda uning vakilining ishini bekor qilish joiz. Demak, bunday holatda yordamchining amallarini bekor qilish joiz.

Accordingly, it is permitted for the Khalifah to oppose the assistant by rejecting what he has done and cancelling what has been carried out, but within the limits of what it is permitted for the Khalifah to reverse if he had done it himself. Therefore, if the assistant had implemented a rule in the correct manner, or gave wealth where it was necessitated, and subsequently the Khalifah came and opposed the assistant in this after its implementation, then there is no value in his opposition; rather the action of the assistant is implemented, and the opinion and opposition of the Khalifah is rejected, since in origin it is his opinion, and in issues similar to these situations it is not correct for him to reverse his own opinion or cancel whatever implementation had been completed. Consequently, it is not correct for him to cancel the action of his assistant in these issues. If the assistant had empowered a governor, an administrator, a commander of the Army, or any other appointment, or had laid down the running of economic issues, military plans, plans for industrialisation, or anything similar, then it is permitted for the Khalifah to cancel it. This is because it is considered to be the opinion of the Khalifah, but is from the issues that are permitted for the Khalifah to reverse if he had undertaken them himself, and so it is permitted to cancel the work of his representative in them. Therefore, in this situation, it is permitted to cancel the actions of the assistant.

Qoida shunday: Xalifa o'z amallaridan tuzatishi mumkin bo'lgan har bir narsani, uning yordamchisining amallaridan tuzatishi ham ruxsat etiladi; xalifa o'z amallaridan tuzatishi ruxsat etilmagan har bir narsani esa, yordamchisining amallaridan tuzatishi ham ruxsat etilmaydi.

The rule in this is: Everything that the Khalifah is able to correct from his own actions, is permitted for him to correct from the actions of his assistant, and everything that the Khalifah is not permitted to correct from his own actions, he is not permitted to correct from the actions of his assistant.